Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Single‐ and Two‐segment Fusion for Denis Type B Spinal Fractures

View through CrossRef
ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical properties of single‐ and two‐segment fusion for Denis type B spinal fracture.MethodsTwo female patients with Denis type B L1 vertebral fractures were studied. Both patients had achieved intervertebral fusion by 1 year postoperatively, at which time CT data were collected, including data of one patient before and after removal of pedicle screws and of another whose pedicle screws were not removed. The data were imported into Mimics software and T11‐L2 three dimensional models established. After construction of the models, they were imported into ANSYS software. An axial load (260 N) and 10 Nm torque were loaded to simulate the flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation of the spine, respectively.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the average displacement of the spine motion between the two‐segment and single‐segment fusion patients without removal of pedicle screws. However, for all motion forms, the average displacement of the single‐segment fusion patient' spine after removal of pedicle screws was significantly greater than that before removal of pedicle screws and that of the two‐segment fusion patient. The average Von Mises stress of T11–12 intervertebral disc of two‐segment fusion patient was significantly greater than that of the one‐segment fusion patient. Moreover, the average Von Mises stress of T11–12 intervertebral disc of single‐segment fusion patient was greater before than after removal of pedicle screws.ConclusionProvided there is satisfactory interbody fusion, removal of pedicle screws after one‐segment fusion can increase spinal motion, reduce the stress on adjacent intervertebral discs and delay disc degeneration.
Title: Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Single‐ and Two‐segment Fusion for Denis Type B Spinal Fractures
Description:
ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical properties of single‐ and two‐segment fusion for Denis type B spinal fracture.
MethodsTwo female patients with Denis type B L1 vertebral fractures were studied.
Both patients had achieved intervertebral fusion by 1 year postoperatively, at which time CT data were collected, including data of one patient before and after removal of pedicle screws and of another whose pedicle screws were not removed.
The data were imported into Mimics software and T11‐L2 three dimensional models established.
After construction of the models, they were imported into ANSYS software.
An axial load (260 N) and 10 Nm torque were loaded to simulate the flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation of the spine, respectively.
ResultsThere was no significant difference in the average displacement of the spine motion between the two‐segment and single‐segment fusion patients without removal of pedicle screws.
However, for all motion forms, the average displacement of the single‐segment fusion patient' spine after removal of pedicle screws was significantly greater than that before removal of pedicle screws and that of the two‐segment fusion patient.
The average Von Mises stress of T11–12 intervertebral disc of two‐segment fusion patient was significantly greater than that of the one‐segment fusion patient.
Moreover, the average Von Mises stress of T11–12 intervertebral disc of single‐segment fusion patient was greater before than after removal of pedicle screws.
ConclusionProvided there is satisfactory interbody fusion, removal of pedicle screws after one‐segment fusion can increase spinal motion, reduce the stress on adjacent intervertebral discs and delay disc degeneration.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award ceremony for 2009 and 2010 award winners was held during the 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference in Daejeon. This time, both 2009 and 2010 award winners w...
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract Fractures are ubiquitous st...
ANATOMY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT OF THE METACARPAL FRACTURES
ANATOMY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT OF THE METACARPAL FRACTURES
Introduction: The fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, also known as boxers fracture, is one of the most frequent traumatic pathologies seen in the emergency department an...
Screening to Prevent Fractures
Screening to Prevent Fractures
Introduction and research questions: Hip fractures and other major fractures pose significant threats to the health and independence of older adults and incur high healthcare costs...
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
This special issue is dedicated to the Borneo International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Rehabilitation Conference (BISCIR) which was held on 30th July – 1st August 2021 through a virt...

Back to Top