Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Radiation dose to patients in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) from interventional radiology

View through CrossRef
The patient dosimetry in Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) procedures was determined by Gafchromic film (GF) and Dose Area Product (DAP) methods. Maximum skin dose can be measured by GF and the average dose calculated from the DAP meter. The study was conducted at unit of interventional radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital in 65 patients who underwent TACE and PTBD procedures. The dose from DAP meter was the accumulated skin dose at different area on the skin of the patient. The study by DAP meter did not show a peak dose that the patient received, and the dose was averaged. Maximum radiation doses to patients from TACE and PTBD procedures were 1.5 and 0.2 Gy, respectively. The patient skin dose in this study depended on many factors, such as kVp, mA, fluoroscopic time, number of frames, patient body mass index (BMI) and number of exposure. Especially numbers of exposure is the most important factor. Correlation between patient skin dose showed that the highest correlation was R² = 0.40, between maximum skin dose from GF and number of exposure and the poorest correlation was R² = 0.04, between maximum skin dose from GF and BMI. Results of measured patient skin doses were analyzed and compared with the standard reference dose. It was found in every procedure that the accumulated entrance skin dose was less than 2 Gy, the threshold dose for skin injury limit. The result indicated that either procedure of TACE or PTBD in interventional radiology was absolutely safe for the patients.
Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University
Title: Radiation dose to patients in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) from interventional radiology
Description:
The patient dosimetry in Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) procedures was determined by Gafchromic film (GF) and Dose Area Product (DAP) methods.
Maximum skin dose can be measured by GF and the average dose calculated from the DAP meter.
The study was conducted at unit of interventional radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital in 65 patients who underwent TACE and PTBD procedures.
The dose from DAP meter was the accumulated skin dose at different area on the skin of the patient.
The study by DAP meter did not show a peak dose that the patient received, and the dose was averaged.
Maximum radiation doses to patients from TACE and PTBD procedures were 1.
5 and 0.
2 Gy, respectively.
The patient skin dose in this study depended on many factors, such as kVp, mA, fluoroscopic time, number of frames, patient body mass index (BMI) and number of exposure.
Especially numbers of exposure is the most important factor.
Correlation between patient skin dose showed that the highest correlation was R² = 0.
40, between maximum skin dose from GF and number of exposure and the poorest correlation was R² = 0.
04, between maximum skin dose from GF and BMI.
Results of measured patient skin doses were analyzed and compared with the standard reference dose.
It was found in every procedure that the accumulated entrance skin dose was less than 2 Gy, the threshold dose for skin injury limit.
The result indicated that either procedure of TACE or PTBD in interventional radiology was absolutely safe for the patients.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in staged treatment of complicated cholelithiasis — preventive vs «on demand»?
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in staged treatment of complicated cholelithiasis — preventive vs «on demand»?
Objective. To analyze therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities of preventive preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with complicated cholelithias...
Infectious Complications after Different Percutaneous External-Internal Biliary Drainage Techniques for Malignant Jaundice
Infectious Complications after Different Percutaneous External-Internal Biliary Drainage Techniques for Malignant Jaundice
Purpose: Analysis of infectious complications incidence in different types of percutaneous externalinternal biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice of tumor genesis....
Cholangiocarcinoma With Sepsis Associated With Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD)
Cholangiocarcinoma With Sepsis Associated With Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD)
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) can be an alternative palliative treatment in resectable cholangiocarcinoma. One of the most common complications of PTBD is infec...
Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single Tertiary Care Institute Experience
Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single Tertiary Care Institute Experience
Introduction: Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a mainstay therapeutic option indicated in early-stage non- resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been shown to...
Percutaneous Transhepatic Treatment of Hepaticojejunal Anastomotic Biliary Strictures After Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Percutaneous Transhepatic Treatment of Hepaticojejunal Anastomotic Biliary Strictures After Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Endoscopic treatment has largely replaced surgery as the initial treatment for biliary strictures following living donor liver transplantation; however, this treatment is nearly im...

Back to Top