Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Artificial Intelligence and its Role in Forensic Karyotyping: A Systematic Review

View through CrossRef
Introduction: One of the most important aspects of forensic investigations and genetic research is forensickaryotyping, which involves analyzing a person’s chromosomes to find genetic anomalies and establishidentification. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology offers a chance to improve and automate the forensic karyotyping procedure. This study examines the possible advantages and difficulties of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic karyotyping. In forensic science, forensic karyotyping is essential for providing an accurate interpretation of genetic data for use in legal and investigative processes. It can offer  useful details regarding genetic problems, such as chromosomal abnormalities or mutations, which can help with personal identification, paternity determination, or supplying proof in criminal investigations.Aim: To give a general review of how artificial intelligence is used in forensic karyotyping, evaluate its possible advantages, and address any relevant issues. By being aware of Artificial Intelligence’s promise and limitations in this field, we may set the stage for its efficient integration into forensic practitioner.Methods: A database search we did to start the inquiry turned up 582 documents. There were 216 unique records left after duplicates were eliminated. 232 items were subsequently eliminated as a result of download problems. A final sample of 31 research was chosen from the 134 full-text papers that were evaluated (n=134), with 103 being eliminated owing to quality issues.Result: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic karyotyping has several advantages, including automated chromosomal analysis, quicker abnormality discovery, and increased uniformity. For a successful application, challenges such as a lack of labelled datasets and ethical issues must be resolved.Concussion: By increasing productivity, precision, and uniformity, artificial intelligence has the potential totransform forensic karyotyping. While there are obstacles, continued study and cooperation amongst several fields might help you get through them. The ethical and appropriate use of AI in forensic karyotyping will improve forensic investigations, boost genetic research, and expand the use of genetics in the legal system.
Title: Artificial Intelligence and its Role in Forensic Karyotyping: A Systematic Review
Description:
Introduction: One of the most important aspects of forensic investigations and genetic research is forensickaryotyping, which involves analyzing a person’s chromosomes to find genetic anomalies and establishidentification.
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology offers a chance to improve and automate the forensic karyotyping procedure.
This study examines the possible advantages and difficulties of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic karyotyping.
In forensic science, forensic karyotyping is essential for providing an accurate interpretation of genetic data for use in legal and investigative processes.
It can offer  useful details regarding genetic problems, such as chromosomal abnormalities or mutations, which can help with personal identification, paternity determination, or supplying proof in criminal investigations.
Aim: To give a general review of how artificial intelligence is used in forensic karyotyping, evaluate its possible advantages, and address any relevant issues.
By being aware of Artificial Intelligence’s promise and limitations in this field, we may set the stage for its efficient integration into forensic practitioner.
Methods: A database search we did to start the inquiry turned up 582 documents.
There were 216 unique records left after duplicates were eliminated.
232 items were subsequently eliminated as a result of download problems.
A final sample of 31 research was chosen from the 134 full-text papers that were evaluated (n=134), with 103 being eliminated owing to quality issues.
Result: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic karyotyping has several advantages, including automated chromosomal analysis, quicker abnormality discovery, and increased uniformity.
For a successful application, challenges such as a lack of labelled datasets and ethical issues must be resolved.
Concussion: By increasing productivity, precision, and uniformity, artificial intelligence has the potential totransform forensic karyotyping.
While there are obstacles, continued study and cooperation amongst several fields might help you get through them.
The ethical and appropriate use of AI in forensic karyotyping will improve forensic investigations, boost genetic research, and expand the use of genetics in the legal system.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
The article analyzes conceptual foundations, views and ideas as to understanding of the essence of the classification of forensic science general theory tasks. The main views of sc...
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
A historical analysis of forensic techniques and forensic science emergence as scientific branches is outlined, their interconnection, differences are considered, the subject, obje...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
The purpose of this study is to document the number of accredited, funded, and filled forensic pathology fellowship positions in the United States and to document the subsequent wo...
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The article examines the system of private theory of forensic activity digitalization from the standpoint of forensic expertology. The subject, objects, tasks of the theory and its...
Development and implementation of forensic anthropology in Swedish forensic practice
Development and implementation of forensic anthropology in Swedish forensic practice
Abstract This paper presents the ongoing development of forensic anthropology in Sweden. We discuss the background of the discipline, its application, as well as its...

Back to Top