Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cleanup to FPSO or Through a Rig in Deep Water—Pro and Cons
View through CrossRef
Abstract
After the drilling and completion of every well, a crucial step involves its preparation for transfer to production. During this operation, we aim to extract the fluids and debris present within the well and potentially in the subsea line system and to reclaim some of the infiltrated substances and fine particles that have encroached upon the vicinity of the wellbore, thereby restoring the well to its peak productivity. This cleanup procedure is orchestrated through a smart selection and strategic placement of fluids within the wellbore, meticulous control of underbalance, potential perforating processes, and a systematic sequencing of choke valve adjustments during the gradual opening of the well to induce flow to the surface. The separation and processing of fluids typically occur close to the wellhead, where they are either prepared for sale or disposed of through various methods. A major question remains of whether to process the fluids at the surface on an FPSO or on a drilling or completion rig.
FPSO cleanup presents advantages such as reduced total cost of ownership, easier fluid disposal facilities, recovery of liquid hydrocarbons, and verification of the full system operational readiness from sand face to the surface production system. However, it usually does not lend itself to a precise control of wellbore cleanup parameters and can create significant stresses on the surface production system. We establish a methodology to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each solution based on a fit-for-purpose cleanup transient simulator and an optimization routine that enables the determination of nonintuitive sequence of control parameters that in both cases can result in significant gains.
The comparison of predicted outcome versus realization in deepwater confirms that nonintuitive considerations must be evaluated to achieve a proper balance of all factors, ranging from met-ocean to rig availability and FPSO tolerance and to slugs and large amount of solids. The concept starts from the reservoir drilling phase and some previously ignored factors can be overwhelmingly important.
The paper outlines how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operational scheduling, and the overall environmental emissions can result in a mutually beneficial solution for the cleanup process. Significantly and counterintuitively, we demonstrate the feasibility of reducing flared hydrocarbon quantities through intricate sequencing of cleanup activities. These seemingly unconventional operational sequences become achievable through the integration of remotely controlled and automated choke sequences along with real-time monitoring of well conditions.
Title: Cleanup to FPSO or Through a Rig in Deep Water—Pro and Cons
Description:
Abstract
After the drilling and completion of every well, a crucial step involves its preparation for transfer to production.
During this operation, we aim to extract the fluids and debris present within the well and potentially in the subsea line system and to reclaim some of the infiltrated substances and fine particles that have encroached upon the vicinity of the wellbore, thereby restoring the well to its peak productivity.
This cleanup procedure is orchestrated through a smart selection and strategic placement of fluids within the wellbore, meticulous control of underbalance, potential perforating processes, and a systematic sequencing of choke valve adjustments during the gradual opening of the well to induce flow to the surface.
The separation and processing of fluids typically occur close to the wellhead, where they are either prepared for sale or disposed of through various methods.
A major question remains of whether to process the fluids at the surface on an FPSO or on a drilling or completion rig.
FPSO cleanup presents advantages such as reduced total cost of ownership, easier fluid disposal facilities, recovery of liquid hydrocarbons, and verification of the full system operational readiness from sand face to the surface production system.
However, it usually does not lend itself to a precise control of wellbore cleanup parameters and can create significant stresses on the surface production system.
We establish a methodology to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each solution based on a fit-for-purpose cleanup transient simulator and an optimization routine that enables the determination of nonintuitive sequence of control parameters that in both cases can result in significant gains.
The comparison of predicted outcome versus realization in deepwater confirms that nonintuitive considerations must be evaluated to achieve a proper balance of all factors, ranging from met-ocean to rig availability and FPSO tolerance and to slugs and large amount of solids.
The concept starts from the reservoir drilling phase and some previously ignored factors can be overwhelmingly important.
The paper outlines how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operational scheduling, and the overall environmental emissions can result in a mutually beneficial solution for the cleanup process.
Significantly and counterintuitively, we demonstrate the feasibility of reducing flared hydrocarbon quantities through intricate sequencing of cleanup activities.
These seemingly unconventional operational sequences become achievable through the integration of remotely controlled and automated choke sequences along with real-time monitoring of well conditions.
Related Results
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Abstract
A new FPSO concept termed CVAR-FPSO is under development by a JNOC headed Joint Industry Project (JIP). The concept, using Compliant Vertical Access Rise...
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
Abstract
The United States Department of the Interior (DOI), Minerals Management Service (MMS) prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS)1 to evaluate poten...
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
ABSTRACT
FPSO technology over the past years has rapidly evolved from tanker based units with classical mooring systems to purpose-shaped new built vessels equipp...
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
Abstract
The first FPSO relocation project was completed 18 years ago (SBM's FPSO II), and since that time there has been a steady rise in the number and complexi...
The Sanha LPG FPSO
The Sanha LPG FPSO
Abstract
The FPSO industry will soon have the first LPG FPSO in operation. The SANHA LPG FPSO is the first gas related FPSO. With the installation of the LPG FPSO...
Modified Offshore Drilling Operation - Serban Well (Nunukan Block)
Modified Offshore Drilling Operation - Serban Well (Nunukan Block)
Abstract
Serban is an offshore drilling project located in Nunukan Block, Indonesia, approximately 3 km northwest of Bunyu Island, an offshore area with very shal...
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Abstract
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) systems represent an untested technology in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Outer Continental Shelf. Th...
Deepstar Study on Predicting FPSO Responses - Model Tests VS Numerical Analysis
Deepstar Study on Predicting FPSO Responses - Model Tests VS Numerical Analysis
1. ABSTRACT
This paper presents the correlation study of FPSO model tests and numerical analyses sponsored by the DeepStar program. The numerical analysis results...

