Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cleanup to FPSO or Through a Rig in Deep Water—Pro and Cons

View through CrossRef
Abstract After the drilling and completion of every well, a crucial step involves its preparation for transfer to production. During this operation, we aim to extract the fluids and debris present within the well and potentially in the subsea line system and to reclaim some of the infiltrated substances and fine particles that have encroached upon the vicinity of the wellbore, thereby restoring the well to its peak productivity. This cleanup procedure is orchestrated through a smart selection and strategic placement of fluids within the wellbore, meticulous control of underbalance, potential perforating processes, and a systematic sequencing of choke valve adjustments during the gradual opening of the well to induce flow to the surface. The separation and processing of fluids typically occur close to the wellhead, where they are either prepared for sale or disposed of through various methods. A major question remains of whether to process the fluids at the surface on an FPSO or on a drilling or completion rig. FPSO cleanup presents advantages such as reduced total cost of ownership, easier fluid disposal facilities, recovery of liquid hydrocarbons, and verification of the full system operational readiness from sand face to the surface production system. However, it usually does not lend itself to a precise control of wellbore cleanup parameters and can create significant stresses on the surface production system. We establish a methodology to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each solution based on a fit-for-purpose cleanup transient simulator and an optimization routine that enables the determination of nonintuitive sequence of control parameters that in both cases can result in significant gains. The comparison of predicted outcome versus realization in deepwater confirms that nonintuitive considerations must be evaluated to achieve a proper balance of all factors, ranging from met-ocean to rig availability and FPSO tolerance and to slugs and large amount of solids. The concept starts from the reservoir drilling phase and some previously ignored factors can be overwhelmingly important. The paper outlines how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operational scheduling, and the overall environmental emissions can result in a mutually beneficial solution for the cleanup process. Significantly and counterintuitively, we demonstrate the feasibility of reducing flared hydrocarbon quantities through intricate sequencing of cleanup activities. These seemingly unconventional operational sequences become achievable through the integration of remotely controlled and automated choke sequences along with real-time monitoring of well conditions.
Title: Cleanup to FPSO or Through a Rig in Deep Water—Pro and Cons
Description:
Abstract After the drilling and completion of every well, a crucial step involves its preparation for transfer to production.
During this operation, we aim to extract the fluids and debris present within the well and potentially in the subsea line system and to reclaim some of the infiltrated substances and fine particles that have encroached upon the vicinity of the wellbore, thereby restoring the well to its peak productivity.
This cleanup procedure is orchestrated through a smart selection and strategic placement of fluids within the wellbore, meticulous control of underbalance, potential perforating processes, and a systematic sequencing of choke valve adjustments during the gradual opening of the well to induce flow to the surface.
The separation and processing of fluids typically occur close to the wellhead, where they are either prepared for sale or disposed of through various methods.
A major question remains of whether to process the fluids at the surface on an FPSO or on a drilling or completion rig.
FPSO cleanup presents advantages such as reduced total cost of ownership, easier fluid disposal facilities, recovery of liquid hydrocarbons, and verification of the full system operational readiness from sand face to the surface production system.
However, it usually does not lend itself to a precise control of wellbore cleanup parameters and can create significant stresses on the surface production system.
We establish a methodology to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each solution based on a fit-for-purpose cleanup transient simulator and an optimization routine that enables the determination of nonintuitive sequence of control parameters that in both cases can result in significant gains.
The comparison of predicted outcome versus realization in deepwater confirms that nonintuitive considerations must be evaluated to achieve a proper balance of all factors, ranging from met-ocean to rig availability and FPSO tolerance and to slugs and large amount of solids.
The concept starts from the reservoir drilling phase and some previously ignored factors can be overwhelmingly important.
The paper outlines how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operational scheduling, and the overall environmental emissions can result in a mutually beneficial solution for the cleanup process.
Significantly and counterintuitively, we demonstrate the feasibility of reducing flared hydrocarbon quantities through intricate sequencing of cleanup activities.
These seemingly unconventional operational sequences become achievable through the integration of remotely controlled and automated choke sequences along with real-time monitoring of well conditions.

Related Results

FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
ABSTRACT FPSO technology over the past years has rapidly evolved from tanker based units with classical mooring systems to purpose-shaped new built vessels equipp...
The Sanha LPG FPSO
The Sanha LPG FPSO
Abstract The FPSO industry will soon have the first LPG FPSO in operation. The SANHA LPG FPSO is the first gas related FPSO. With the installation of the LPG FPSO...
ROSA: New Challenges in West Africa Deepwater Developments
ROSA: New Challenges in West Africa Deepwater Developments
Abstract Discovered in 1998, the Rosa field is located offshore Angola in the prolific Block 17, at a distance of 16 kilometers from the spread-moored Girassol FP...
FPSO Integrity; Structural Monitoring of Glas Dowr
FPSO Integrity; Structural Monitoring of Glas Dowr
Abstract The objective of the Joint Industry project 'FPSO Integrity' is to provide insight in the fatigue loading of FPSO's and the accuracy and validity of comp...
Gryphon Alpha FPSO - Experience Gained During Moorings Replacement and Hook-Up
Gryphon Alpha FPSO - Experience Gained During Moorings Replacement and Hook-Up
Abstract In a North Sea storm during February 2011 the Gryphon Alpha FPSO broke four of her 10 mooring lines and moved partially off station, causing damage to su...
Design and Conversion of FPSO Mystras
Design and Conversion of FPSO Mystras
Abstract A recently completed FPSO conversion project shows some novel features in FPSO design. An existing trading tanker was selected for conversion into a 48,0...
Project To Upright The Alexander L. Kielland
Project To Upright The Alexander L. Kielland
Abstract The Alexander L Kielland is a drilling rig of Pentagone type. It was being used as an accommodation unit when it capsized in the North Sea in 1980 as a r...

Back to Top