Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Well Clean-Up and Flowback Optimization Considering Emission Reductions
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Ultimately, most new wells need to be put into production, whether it is for temporary well testing during the exploration and appraisal phase or during the development phase prior to commercial flows. This process, commonly known as clean-up, encompasses tasks such as handling contaminated fluids, ensuring proper disposal methods, and managing flow instability during the initial stages. These aspects pose various challenges that need to be addressed.
Regrettably, the conventional approach to fluid disposal has been through flaring. The primary concerns of cost efficiency and expediting commercial production have outweighed other considerations. However, some commendable local regulations, like the one currently in effect in Brazil or the Gulf of Mexico, have mandated the storage of liquid effluents during these operations. The driving force behind such mandates is primarily focused on reducing the visibility of fluid releases into the environment, rather than addressing the actual environmental impact. It is important to note that these "non-routine" flaring operations contribute to less than 5% of the total emission footprint and should not be overlooked. Based on an analysis of over 300 clean-up operations worldwide, we have concluded that it is feasible to reduce the required amount of flaring for well start-up and clean-up operations by 50%, without compromising the future performance of production systems.
The paper illustrates how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operation scheduling, and overall emission footprint can result in a mutually beneficial solution for clean-up. Interestingly, and somewhat counterintuitively, we demonstrate that it is feasible to minimize the quantity of flared hydrocarbons through an intricate operational sequencing of clean-up operations. These seemingly improbable (and non-intuitive) operational sequences are made possible by implementing remotely controlled and automated choke sequences, coupled with real-time monitoring of well conditions.
Accurately measuring the potential reduction in emissions plays a crucial role in successfully implementing these innovative methodologies. The adoption of such approaches by regulators, operating companies, and service providers hinges on the combination of quantifiable environmental impact, operational reliability, safety, and economic considerations. This paper showcases the implementation of these processes in both land and deep-water operations, offering insightful comparisons between different options. The challenges associated with deployment are discussed, and practical lessons learned from the Middle East and deep-water operations are shared, demonstrating how emissions during clean-ups can be reduced by up to 50% while also lowering operational costs.
Title: Well Clean-Up and Flowback Optimization Considering Emission Reductions
Description:
Abstract
Ultimately, most new wells need to be put into production, whether it is for temporary well testing during the exploration and appraisal phase or during the development phase prior to commercial flows.
This process, commonly known as clean-up, encompasses tasks such as handling contaminated fluids, ensuring proper disposal methods, and managing flow instability during the initial stages.
These aspects pose various challenges that need to be addressed.
Regrettably, the conventional approach to fluid disposal has been through flaring.
The primary concerns of cost efficiency and expediting commercial production have outweighed other considerations.
However, some commendable local regulations, like the one currently in effect in Brazil or the Gulf of Mexico, have mandated the storage of liquid effluents during these operations.
The driving force behind such mandates is primarily focused on reducing the visibility of fluid releases into the environment, rather than addressing the actual environmental impact.
It is important to note that these "non-routine" flaring operations contribute to less than 5% of the total emission footprint and should not be overlooked.
Based on an analysis of over 300 clean-up operations worldwide, we have concluded that it is feasible to reduce the required amount of flaring for well start-up and clean-up operations by 50%, without compromising the future performance of production systems.
The paper illustrates how a thorough assessment of field development architecture, operation scheduling, and overall emission footprint can result in a mutually beneficial solution for clean-up.
Interestingly, and somewhat counterintuitively, we demonstrate that it is feasible to minimize the quantity of flared hydrocarbons through an intricate operational sequencing of clean-up operations.
These seemingly improbable (and non-intuitive) operational sequences are made possible by implementing remotely controlled and automated choke sequences, coupled with real-time monitoring of well conditions.
Accurately measuring the potential reduction in emissions plays a crucial role in successfully implementing these innovative methodologies.
The adoption of such approaches by regulators, operating companies, and service providers hinges on the combination of quantifiable environmental impact, operational reliability, safety, and economic considerations.
This paper showcases the implementation of these processes in both land and deep-water operations, offering insightful comparisons between different options.
The challenges associated with deployment are discussed, and practical lessons learned from the Middle East and deep-water operations are shared, demonstrating how emissions during clean-ups can be reduced by up to 50% while also lowering operational costs.
Related Results
The Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emission During Flowback Process in Weiyuan Shale Production Site, China
The Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emission During Flowback Process in Weiyuan Shale Production Site, China
Abstract
Objectives/Scope: Greenhouse gas emission (carbon dioxide and methane, etc.) during shale gas production could decide whether it is a cleaner energy source ...
Analysis of Compositions of Flowback Water from Marcellus Shale Wells by Utilizing Data Mining Techniques
Analysis of Compositions of Flowback Water from Marcellus Shale Wells by Utilizing Data Mining Techniques
Abstract
Volume and salt concentrations in Marcellus flowback water depend on geology, drilling and completions, stimulation and flowback operations. Recent studies ...
Processing and Recycling of Waste Flowback Fracturing Fluids in Tarim Basin, China
Processing and Recycling of Waste Flowback Fracturing Fluids in Tarim Basin, China
Abstract
Hydraulic fracturing is extensively used in the petroleum industry to enhance well productivity. However, the discharge of flowback fracturing fluids after ...
Pursuing Improved Flowback Recovery after Hydraulic Fracturing
Pursuing Improved Flowback Recovery after Hydraulic Fracturing
Abstract
Low injected fracturing fluid recovery has been an issue during flowback period that is highly impacted by the fracture closure behavior. Although existing ...
Green Growth and Sustainable Development on the Way: A Case Study from Fracturing Campaign in South Sulige Gas Field
Green Growth and Sustainable Development on the Way: A Case Study from Fracturing Campaign in South Sulige Gas Field
Abstract
The South Sulige gas field is located in the middle of the Mu Us Desert in Inner Mongolia, with an arid climate, sparse vegetation, scarce water resources, ...
Flowback Analysis for Fracture Characterization
Flowback Analysis for Fracture Characterization
Abstract
Tight reservoirs stimulated by multistage hydraulic fracturing are commonly characterized by analyzing the hydrocarbon production data. However, analyzing t...
Optimization of Fracture Cleanup Using Flowback Analysis
Optimization of Fracture Cleanup Using Flowback Analysis
Abstract
A field study in north-central Texas shows how flowback procedures can be optimized to improve fracture cleanup and well productivity in low-permeability fo...
Selection of the Flowback Rate for DFIT-Flowback Test
Selection of the Flowback Rate for DFIT-Flowback Test
Abstract
The DFIT-flowback test has shown some advantages in terms of running time and accuracy over typical injection tests such as DFITs specially in very low perm...

