Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Propellant enhancement is a method of increasing permeability through the application of a transient high pressure event to the target formation. As distinct from hydraulic fracturing, propellant enhancement does not involve the application of chemicals or water and consequently does not present the potential for legacy environmental issues. This paper compares the regulatory aspects of propellant enhancement within the states of Australia and also the differences between environmental impacts.
A series of propellant enhancements were undertaken for a suite of gas wells in the Surat Basin, Queensland. Propellant charges in the range 18-30 kg were initiated, with deflagration times in the range 500-1,000 milliseconds. The compliance regime for the transport, storage and use of propellant is established under the state’s Explosives Act 1999 as well as the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 and the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
There are three categories of fracturing used to increase permeability: explosive fracturing; hydraulic fracturing; and propellant enhancement. Explosive fracturing applies a very high pressure transient over a period of a few microseconds and can cause local, radial fracturing but with less desired compaction; hydraulic fracturing applies a lower pressure but over a longer period and with greater surface power, resulting in fractures that can extend 200-300 m, largely in the vertical plane; and propellant enhancement, which applies a mid-range pressure over a period of 10-1,000 milliseconds, resulting in fractures extending tens of metres but with random distribution. Residuals from the deflagration process are nitrogen, hydrogen chloride, water and carbon dioxide. There are no precursors for the BTEX suite and no conditions arising that could produce BTEX.
A prime question was to determine whether propellant enhancement is captured under the term ‘hydraulic fracturing’ in states’ regulations across Australia. Propellant enhancement is a technology with very few environmental impacts. Vehicular movements to support propellant enhancement are less than five percent of those to undertake hydraulic fracturing on the same formation. There is no requirement for waste water treatment.
Title: An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells
Description:
Abstract
Propellant enhancement is a method of increasing permeability through the application of a transient high pressure event to the target formation.
As distinct from hydraulic fracturing, propellant enhancement does not involve the application of chemicals or water and consequently does not present the potential for legacy environmental issues.
This paper compares the regulatory aspects of propellant enhancement within the states of Australia and also the differences between environmental impacts.
A series of propellant enhancements were undertaken for a suite of gas wells in the Surat Basin, Queensland.
Propellant charges in the range 18-30 kg were initiated, with deflagration times in the range 500-1,000 milliseconds.
The compliance regime for the transport, storage and use of propellant is established under the state’s Explosives Act 1999 as well as the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 and the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
There are three categories of fracturing used to increase permeability: explosive fracturing; hydraulic fracturing; and propellant enhancement.
Explosive fracturing applies a very high pressure transient over a period of a few microseconds and can cause local, radial fracturing but with less desired compaction; hydraulic fracturing applies a lower pressure but over a longer period and with greater surface power, resulting in fractures that can extend 200-300 m, largely in the vertical plane; and propellant enhancement, which applies a mid-range pressure over a period of 10-1,000 milliseconds, resulting in fractures extending tens of metres but with random distribution.
Residuals from the deflagration process are nitrogen, hydrogen chloride, water and carbon dioxide.
There are no precursors for the BTEX suite and no conditions arising that could produce BTEX.
A prime question was to determine whether propellant enhancement is captured under the term ‘hydraulic fracturing’ in states’ regulations across Australia.
Propellant enhancement is a technology with very few environmental impacts.
Vehicular movements to support propellant enhancement are less than five percent of those to undertake hydraulic fracturing on the same formation.
There is no requirement for waste water treatment.
Related Results
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a survey on horizontal gas well activity throughout the world. The survey was conducted for the Gas Research Institute...
Research on NEPE Propellant at High Strain Rates
Research on NEPE Propellant at High Strain Rates
Abstract
In order to study the mechanical properties of Nitrate Ester Plasticized Polyether (NEPE) propellant at high strain rates, the impact tests of NEPE propella...
Biaxial tensile test and meso damage numerical simulation of HTPB propellant
Biaxial tensile test and meso damage numerical simulation of HTPB propellant
Abstract
Aiming at the shortcomings of the current research on the mechanical properties of solid propellants under complex stress conditions, an effective cross-shaped tes...
Preliminary analysis of ballistic requirements for LOVA propellants for new generation tank ammunition
Preliminary analysis of ballistic requirements for LOVA propellants for new generation tank ammunition
At the end of 2016, the Scientific-Industrial Consortium (Mesko S.A., Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa S.A., Warsaw University of Technology, Military University of Technology, Military In...
Water Cresting Behavior Under High Angle Wells: An Experimental Investigation
Water Cresting Behavior Under High Angle Wells: An Experimental Investigation
Abstract
Most of the published papers related to bottom water movement deal with vertical and horizontal wells. The behavior of water cresting under high angle we...
Effect of High Temperature on Aging and Service Life Prediction of 2/1 Camphor Propellant
Effect of High Temperature on Aging and Service Life Prediction of 2/1 Camphor Propellant
ABSTRACTThe 2/1 camphor propellant is widely used as the main charge in aerospace pyrotechnic devices. However, long‐term service of 2/1 camphor propellant in high‐temperature spac...
Research on the Needle Deformation of Extrusion Mold for 19-hole Propellant
Research on the Needle Deformation of Extrusion Mold for 19-hole Propellant
Abstract
Pore diameter and arc thickness of propellant are decided by the extrusion mold parameters. Mold needles deform during propellant’s forming process because ...

