Circulation models, interior evolution, and James Webb observations of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76b

We present a suite of General Circulation Models (GCMs) and interior evolution models of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76b using the SPARC framework of ADAM (formerly the SPARC/MITgcm) and compare the results to recently obtained JWST NIRSpec/G395H phase-curve and emission data. The emission spectra of the planet is obtained on the dayside, nightside, and morning and evening limbs.We vary a spatially independent atmospheric drag term; this crudely represents effects such as Ohmic dissipation, turbulent mixing, shocks, and hydrodynamic instabilities, suppressing the atmospheric flow within the atmosphere. We present five scenarios, varying from strong atmospheric drag to essentially drag free cases. We run models with and without the cloud species enstatite and corundum, which are allowed to circulate through the atmosphere and feed back into the radiative transfer calculations. We also account for the effect of hydrogen dissociation on the hot dayside of WASP-76b.We use a grid of MESA models to predict heating strengths required to match the present-day radius. We find which heating strengths and depths are suitable to match the present-day radius of WASP-76b and use the output temperature profiles to fix the bottom atmosphere temperature for the GCM runs. We compare the evolution and resulting profiles of models with no core, models with a simple constant density heavy-element core, and models with a self-consistent compressible core.We post-process the GCM outputs using the gCMCRT radiative transfer code. We find that the atmospheres with moderately strong drag and clouds provide the best fit to the James Webb phase-curve data. The need for strong drag aligns with results for other ultra-hot Jupiters (WASP-18b, WASP-103b, WASP-121b), from both Spitzer and JWST phase-curves.We find that our simple drag treatment doesn’t capture the complexity of the circulation around the limbs of the planet. East-west asymmetries are clear in the JWST emission data, with the morning limb being ~200 PPM ‘hotter’ than the evening limb (in units Fp/Fs). The requirement of relatively strong atmospheric drag to match the phase curve data results in near-identical simulated emission spectra in our model limbs. This motivates further research to physically motivate the mechanisms causing atmospheric drag, such as magnetohydrodynamic effects.We also vary the metallicity and C/O ratio, to better fit the emission spectra. We find that producing fits to the emission spectra requires careful consideration of the atmospheric composition.We find that interior heating has little effect on the observational properties of the planet, with the main observational effects being from the varying atmospheric drag.These results showcase the current state-of-the-art emission and phase-curve observations of WASP-76b, with comparisons to careful modelling efforts utilising a GCM with a high level of physical complexity.