Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Exploring the boundaries of rhetoric
View through CrossRef
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine how the boundaries of rhetoric have excluded important theoretical and practical subjects and how these subjects are recuperated and extended since the twentieth century. Its purpose is to foster the awareness on emerging new trends of rhetoric.
Design/methodology/approach
– The methodology is based on an interpretation of the history of rhetoric and on the construction of a conceptual framework of the rhetoric of judgment, which is introduced in this paper.
Findings
– On the subject of the extension of rhetoric from public speeches to any kinds of persuasive situations, the paper emphasizes some stimulating relationships between the theory of communication and rhetoric. On the exclusion and recuperation of the subject of rhetorical arguments, it presents the changing relationships between rhetoric and dialectics and emphasizes the role of rhetoric in scientific research. On the introduction of rhetoric of judgment and meanings it creates a conceptual framework based on a re-examination of the concept of judgment and the phenomenological foundations of the interpretative methods of social sciences by Alfred Schutz, relating them to symbolic interactionism and theories of the self.
Originality/value
– The study on the changing boundaries of rhetoric and the introduction of the rhetoric of judgment offers a new view on the present theoretical and practical development of rhetoric, which opens new subjects of research and new fields of applications.
Title: Exploring the boundaries of rhetoric
Description:
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine how the boundaries of rhetoric have excluded important theoretical and practical subjects and how these subjects are recuperated and extended since the twentieth century.
Its purpose is to foster the awareness on emerging new trends of rhetoric.
Design/methodology/approach
– The methodology is based on an interpretation of the history of rhetoric and on the construction of a conceptual framework of the rhetoric of judgment, which is introduced in this paper.
Findings
– On the subject of the extension of rhetoric from public speeches to any kinds of persuasive situations, the paper emphasizes some stimulating relationships between the theory of communication and rhetoric.
On the exclusion and recuperation of the subject of rhetorical arguments, it presents the changing relationships between rhetoric and dialectics and emphasizes the role of rhetoric in scientific research.
On the introduction of rhetoric of judgment and meanings it creates a conceptual framework based on a re-examination of the concept of judgment and the phenomenological foundations of the interpretative methods of social sciences by Alfred Schutz, relating them to symbolic interactionism and theories of the self.
Originality/value
– The study on the changing boundaries of rhetoric and the introduction of the rhetoric of judgment offers a new view on the present theoretical and practical development of rhetoric, which opens new subjects of research and new fields of applications.
Related Results
Rhetoric and Communication
Rhetoric and Communication
The term “rhetoric” (rhetorike) was coined by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, and systematically elaborated upon by his successor Aristotle. On the basis of these foundational...
Comparative Legal Rhetoric
Comparative Legal Rhetoric
This paper theorizes a new discipline, comparative legal rhetoric, which can accomplish two important goals. First, in a society broken down by intractable polarization and win/lo...
Editor Words
Editor Words
In its 64 issue, the scholarly Rhetoric and Communications journal continues its tradition of publishing in-depth research by established scholars and emerging researchers from Bul...
Sir Philip Sidney : contrasting views on the value and morality of rhetoric and poetry
Sir Philip Sidney : contrasting views on the value and morality of rhetoric and poetry
Sidney's attitude toward rhetoric passes through three rather distinct stages. At first, he is quite positive toward it, treats it with respect, and, what is perhaps even more impo...
Education policy rhetoric and reality gap: a reflection
Education policy rhetoric and reality gap: a reflection
PurposeThis paper aims to discuss why there is often a gulf of difference between policy rhetoric and reality. In particular, the paper seeks to explore issues with the policy rhet...
Komunikasi BENTUK KOMUNIKASI POLITIK RETORIKA POLITIK
Komunikasi BENTUK KOMUNIKASI POLITIK RETORIKA POLITIK
ABSTRACT
Rhetoric was prepared to be a lecture material and reference book, especially for students andinterested people who want to deepen their knowledge and apply it in formal a...
GEOMORPHIC BOUNDARIES WITHIN RIVER NETWORKS
GEOMORPHIC BOUNDARIES WITHIN RIVER NETWORKS
Author contributions: MWS and MCT contributed equally to all aspects of
this research and manuscript preparation. Key Points 1. The physical
character of different functional proce...
Confronting Toxic Rhetoric
Confronting Toxic Rhetoric
Confronting Toxic Rhetoric contributes to the extant scholarship on toxic rhetoric, specifically the negative and extreme political discourse surrounding the Trump years of campaig...

