Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Combination of Spirolizers and Spring Centralizers Reduces the Risk of Differential Sticking: Case Study of Wells in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Nigeria
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Over the past 4 years, there have been several stuck incidents during installation of liners and casing in some wells in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Nigeria. In most cases, the sticking mechanism was identified to be differential due to high pressure over balance across some depleted sand intervals. Attempt to free the casing or liner string was successful in few of the cases, while in others, it resulted in either cementing the casing in place at the stuck depth and deploying contingency option where they exist or going through the long, rigorous and expensive process of fishing, plugging back and sidetracking. Investigations into these incidents pointed mostly to the casing centralization.
During casing installation, a good standoff is required to keep the casing string away from the wall of the well bore to avoid differential sticking and achieve good cement placement. On the other hand, excessive centralization could lead to increased drag force particularly in deviated wells with the attendant risk of not getting the casing to bottom. Prior to casing installation, it is a standard practice to run simulation on centraliser spacing to achieve an acceptable standoff. Bow spring centralizers are commonly used especially for 9-5/8" casing installation and experience has shown that placement of these centralisers to achieve the acceptable standoff in order to avoid differential sticking as well as good cement distribution has led to having a casing string packed with centralisers thereby increasing the drag force. It therefore became imperative to develop a strategy for optimum centralizer placement in order to achieve both the acceptable standoff to avoid differential sticking and minimum drag. This paper discusses the approach taken to achieve this acceptable standoff with minimum drag force using a combination of Spirolizers and Bow spring centralisers and its impact in reducing the risk of differential sticking.
Title: Combination of Spirolizers and Spring Centralizers Reduces the Risk of Differential Sticking: Case Study of Wells in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Nigeria
Description:
Abstract
Over the past 4 years, there have been several stuck incidents during installation of liners and casing in some wells in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Nigeria.
In most cases, the sticking mechanism was identified to be differential due to high pressure over balance across some depleted sand intervals.
Attempt to free the casing or liner string was successful in few of the cases, while in others, it resulted in either cementing the casing in place at the stuck depth and deploying contingency option where they exist or going through the long, rigorous and expensive process of fishing, plugging back and sidetracking.
Investigations into these incidents pointed mostly to the casing centralization.
During casing installation, a good standoff is required to keep the casing string away from the wall of the well bore to avoid differential sticking and achieve good cement placement.
On the other hand, excessive centralization could lead to increased drag force particularly in deviated wells with the attendant risk of not getting the casing to bottom.
Prior to casing installation, it is a standard practice to run simulation on centraliser spacing to achieve an acceptable standoff.
Bow spring centralizers are commonly used especially for 9-5/8" casing installation and experience has shown that placement of these centralisers to achieve the acceptable standoff in order to avoid differential sticking as well as good cement distribution has led to having a casing string packed with centralisers thereby increasing the drag force.
It therefore became imperative to develop a strategy for optimum centralizer placement in order to achieve both the acceptable standoff to avoid differential sticking and minimum drag.
This paper discusses the approach taken to achieve this acceptable standoff with minimum drag force using a combination of Spirolizers and Bow spring centralisers and its impact in reducing the risk of differential sticking.
Related Results
Quantum imaging with optical fibre structures
Quantum imaging with optical fibre structures
(English) Two-photon quantum correlations are a resource for quantum communication, sensing, and imaging. Coincidence-based quantum imaging leverages spatiotemporal quantum correla...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Integrated Production System Modeling in SPDC, Nigeria
Integrated Production System Modeling in SPDC, Nigeria
Abstract
As part of the Shell in-house simulation platform, the Hydrocarbon Field Planning Tool (HFPT) provides capabilities for the rigorous integrated subsurfac...
Analysis of Sticking and the Releasing Technology of the Composite Gypsum-Salt Rock in the Tarim Basin
Analysis of Sticking and the Releasing Technology of the Composite Gypsum-Salt Rock in the Tarim Basin
ABSTRACT:
The Kuqa FoId-Thrust BeIt in Tarim Basin is verified as the most challenging geological structure for ultra-deep hydrocarbon development in China onshor...
MISCONCEPTION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL COMPANIES ON THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES: A STUDY OF SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND COMMUNITIES IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA
MISCONCEPTION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL COMPANIES ON THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES: A STUDY OF SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND COMMUNITIES IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA
Over time, there has been a strained relationship between the residents of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria and the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) due to the perceived...
Abandonment of Wells in Shell Nigeria Operations
Abandonment of Wells in Shell Nigeria Operations
Abstract
Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC) recently embarked on a campaign to abandon some wells in line with a corporate drive to enhanc...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN EMPOWERING CLUSTER COMMUNITIES IN KOLOKUMA/OPOKUMA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA
ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN EMPOWERING CLUSTER COMMUNITIES IN KOLOKUMA/OPOKUMA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA
The study assessed community development projects available by Shell petroleum Development Company (SPDC) in empowering rural dwellers in Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area of ...

