Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Optimization of Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection to Enhance Oil Recovery in Shale Reservoirs
View through CrossRef
AbstractWhen the oil price is low, it is essential to optimize an EOR process in low-permeability reservoir, especially in unconventional shale oil reservoirs. Gas huff-n-puff, has shown to be an effective EOR method. This paper is to optimize this process to enhance oil recovery in shale oil reservoirs.To optimize the huff-n-puff process, we need a field model. However, such field data were not available to us. In this paper, we first upscale laboratory-scale data to field-scale. In the laboratory, methane huff-n-puff experiments were conducted using the Wolfcamp core plugs with the same length of 2″ and different diameters (1.5″, 2″, 3″ and 4″) at injection pressure of 2000 psi. The cores were saturated with the Wolfcamp crude oil. A composition model was built to history match the experimental data. Then the model was scaled up to a field-scale model for the optimization study. The study is to optimize: 1) gas injection time and injection rate; 2) gas production time and production rate; 3) soaking time; 4) gas injection pore volume.The simulation results show that the most effective optimization is to increase the pressure gradient during huff and puff periods so that the maximum average pressure gradient in the matrix can be achieved at a fixed operation time. The pressure gradient is increased by increasing injection pressure or decreasing production pressure. Before reaching the set injection pressure or production pressure, the oil recovery in one huff-n-puff cycle increases, as the injection and production times are increased. After reaching the set injection pressure and production pressure, increasing the huff or puff time will not lead to a significantly more oil recovery. There exist optimum values for injection rate during huff process and production rate during puff process. When the rate is less than the optimal value, the oil recovery increases as the operation rate increases. When the operation rate is higher than the optimal value, increasing the injection rate will lead to slightly decline in the oil recovery, while further increasing production rate will cause insignificant oil recovery increase. We also found that adding soaking time will decrease oil recovery.
Title: Optimization of Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection to Enhance Oil Recovery in Shale Reservoirs
Description:
AbstractWhen the oil price is low, it is essential to optimize an EOR process in low-permeability reservoir, especially in unconventional shale oil reservoirs.
Gas huff-n-puff, has shown to be an effective EOR method.
This paper is to optimize this process to enhance oil recovery in shale oil reservoirs.
To optimize the huff-n-puff process, we need a field model.
However, such field data were not available to us.
In this paper, we first upscale laboratory-scale data to field-scale.
In the laboratory, methane huff-n-puff experiments were conducted using the Wolfcamp core plugs with the same length of 2″ and different diameters (1.
5″, 2″, 3″ and 4″) at injection pressure of 2000 psi.
The cores were saturated with the Wolfcamp crude oil.
A composition model was built to history match the experimental data.
Then the model was scaled up to a field-scale model for the optimization study.
The study is to optimize: 1) gas injection time and injection rate; 2) gas production time and production rate; 3) soaking time; 4) gas injection pore volume.
The simulation results show that the most effective optimization is to increase the pressure gradient during huff and puff periods so that the maximum average pressure gradient in the matrix can be achieved at a fixed operation time.
The pressure gradient is increased by increasing injection pressure or decreasing production pressure.
Before reaching the set injection pressure or production pressure, the oil recovery in one huff-n-puff cycle increases, as the injection and production times are increased.
After reaching the set injection pressure and production pressure, increasing the huff or puff time will not lead to a significantly more oil recovery.
There exist optimum values for injection rate during huff process and production rate during puff process.
When the rate is less than the optimal value, the oil recovery increases as the operation rate increases.
When the operation rate is higher than the optimal value, increasing the injection rate will lead to slightly decline in the oil recovery, while further increasing production rate will cause insignificant oil recovery increase.
We also found that adding soaking time will decrease oil recovery.
Related Results
EffectiveFracturing Technology of Normal Pressure Shale Gas Wells
EffectiveFracturing Technology of Normal Pressure Shale Gas Wells
ABSTRACT
There is abundant normal pressure shale gas resource in China. However, it is hard to acquire commercial breakthroughs because of the relative low initia...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract
Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Experimental study on the effect of foam in preventing gas channeling in shale reservoir
Experimental study on the effect of foam in preventing gas channeling in shale reservoir
Shale oil resources have enormous potential and broad development prospects in China. Especially with the rapid development of horizontal well volume fracturing technology, the pro...
New Findings on Heatloss of Superheated Steam Transmitted Along the Wellbore and Heating Enhancement in Heavy Oil Reservoirs
New Findings on Heatloss of Superheated Steam Transmitted Along the Wellbore and Heating Enhancement in Heavy Oil Reservoirs
Abstract
At the conclusion of several cycles conventional saturated steam huff and puff in heavy oil reservoirs, the heating radius are typically only 20–30m as i...
Utilizing Natural Gas Huff and Puff to Enhance Production in Heavy Oil Reservoir
Utilizing Natural Gas Huff and Puff to Enhance Production in Heavy Oil Reservoir
Abstract
L Block is a super-deep heavy oil reservoir with the degassed oil viscosity of 9,680∼12,000mPa.s @50☐, 2800∼3300 m deep with normal pressure system and 80∼9...
Sequential Multiwell Steam Huff ‘n’ Puff in Heavy-Oil Development
Sequential Multiwell Steam Huff ‘n’ Puff in Heavy-Oil Development
Abstract
Steam huff and puff, generally thought of as a single well process, has seen interwell interactions such as steam channeling and/or watering out of neighbor...
The Study of Surfactant Huff and Puff of Horizontal Well with SRV in Tight Oil Reservoirs
The Study of Surfactant Huff and Puff of Horizontal Well with SRV in Tight Oil Reservoirs
Abstract
A local refined model, using micro-seismic data to model fracture geometry, is presented to study huff-n-puff surfactant injection in a tight oil reservoir....
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Abstract
Unconventional reservoirs have burst with considerable force in oil and gas production worldwide. Shale Gas is one of them, with intense activity taking pla...

