Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Biofuels Policy in Europe Under the Directive 2003/30: An Analysis of Goals, Hindrances, Instruments and Effects
View through CrossRef
Up to 2008/2009, biofuels were considered one of the best alternatives to oil consumption in a captive market like transports, being one of the pillars of the 20-20-20 initiative in Europe. Improvement of security of supply through partial substitution of imported oil; reduction of GHGs emissions; improvement of income and employment in the agricultural and rural sectors were the main drivers of the promotion of biofuels in Europe, as well as in the United States and in Brazil. In the European Union biofuels policy was supported through Directive 2003/30. However its effects proved to be disappointing: the consumption of biofuels was expected by the Directive to account for 5.75% share of road fuels in 2010 in the European MSs, but it came early clear that such a target could not be met. Above all, consensus about biofuels decreased sharply when their ability to strongly decrease overall GHGs emissions was questioned, and when they were blamed of being the main responsible of the 2007-2008 food price increase. Finally, a new Directive was approved on April 23rd, 2009, including the request of various certifications to prove the sustainability of biofuels.
The paper deals deeply with the biofuel experience in Europe, providing a general analysis of the 2003/30 Directive. It includes an evaluation of the difficulties met in satisfying the requested targets, an assessment of the MSs policies to support biofuels, and a discussion about the main features of the (failed) birth of a new industry.
Title: Biofuels Policy in Europe Under the Directive 2003/30: An Analysis of Goals, Hindrances, Instruments and Effects
Description:
Up to 2008/2009, biofuels were considered one of the best alternatives to oil consumption in a captive market like transports, being one of the pillars of the 20-20-20 initiative in Europe.
Improvement of security of supply through partial substitution of imported oil; reduction of GHGs emissions; improvement of income and employment in the agricultural and rural sectors were the main drivers of the promotion of biofuels in Europe, as well as in the United States and in Brazil.
In the European Union biofuels policy was supported through Directive 2003/30.
However its effects proved to be disappointing: the consumption of biofuels was expected by the Directive to account for 5.
75% share of road fuels in 2010 in the European MSs, but it came early clear that such a target could not be met.
Above all, consensus about biofuels decreased sharply when their ability to strongly decrease overall GHGs emissions was questioned, and when they were blamed of being the main responsible of the 2007-2008 food price increase.
Finally, a new Directive was approved on April 23rd, 2009, including the request of various certifications to prove the sustainability of biofuels.
The paper deals deeply with the biofuel experience in Europe, providing a general analysis of the 2003/30 Directive.
It includes an evaluation of the difficulties met in satisfying the requested targets, an assessment of the MSs policies to support biofuels, and a discussion about the main features of the (failed) birth of a new industry.
Related Results
BIOFUELS AND FUTURE TRENDS
BIOFUELS AND FUTURE TRENDS
Biofuels, derived from organic materials, have emerged as a sustainable alternative to traditional fossil fuels, addressing environmental concerns and energy security. This chapter...
DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFUELS PRODUCTION FROM AGRICULTURAL RAW MATERIALS
DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFUELS PRODUCTION FROM AGRICULTURAL RAW MATERIALS
The aim of the article is to assess the dynamics of the development of biofuels production from agricultural raw materials and the share of biofuels in the consumption of the most ...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Production of Biofuels from Biomass as an Approach Towards Sustainable Development: A Short Review
Production of Biofuels from Biomass as an Approach Towards Sustainable Development: A Short Review
Alternative fuels reduce the carbon footprint of internal combustion engines. Biofuels are the most important alternative fuels. Manufacturing processes for biofuels have made it ...
Is the Food Versus Biofuels Contraversy Real or a Fallacy?
Is the Food Versus Biofuels Contraversy Real or a Fallacy?
ABSTRACT
This paper's primary aim is to assess the main contentious issues of the food versus biofuels (FvF) debate. It challenges the view of those speaking out ...
Regulating Spam: Directive 2002/58 and Beyond
Regulating Spam: Directive 2002/58 and Beyond
This paper analyses the legal framework regulating unsolicited commercial communications or spam in the European Union. Our focus is on the Directive on privacy and electronic comm...

