Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Hebbian synapses in visual cortex
View through CrossRef
We discovered in slices of rat visual cortex that reliable long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic responses in layer III could be elicited by theta burst stimulation delivered to a site in the middle of the cortical thickness, corresponding mainly to layer IV. This synaptic plasticity was reflected in the extracellular field potentials and intracellular EPSPs in layer III, but was not observed in the intracellular responses of layer V neurons, suggesting a preferential involvement of synapses on layer III neurons. Tetanus-induced LTP in this preparation was input specific, and was blocked by application of an NMDA receptor antagonist (but not by an antagonist of nitric oxide synthase). In addition, LTP of layer IV-evoked responses could also be produced reliably by pairing low-frequency synaptic stimulation (approximately 100 pulses at 1 Hz) with strong intracellular depolarization of layer III neurons. Thus, LTP in this circuit satisfies the definition of a “Hebbian” modification. Tetanic stimulation of the white matter, in sharp contrast, consistently failed to elicit LTP in layer III unless a GABAA receptor antagonist was applied to the slice. Analysis indicated that the critical difference between layer IV and white matter stimulation was not the magnitude of the responses to single stimuli delivered to the two sites, but that it might lie in the postsynaptic response during high-frequency stimulation. Consistent with this idea, “associative” LTP could be elicited from white matter when converging but independent inputs from the white matter and layer IV simultaneously received tetanic conditioning stimulation. A hypothetical model is presented to account for the differences between layer IV and white matter stimulation. According to this “plasticity gate hypothesis,” inhibitory circuitry in layer IV normally acts as a sort of band-pass filter that constrains the types of activity patterns that can gain access to the modifiable synapses in layer III. By stimulating in layer IV, we have bypassed this filter and therefore do not need to block GABAA receptors to achieve the threshold for LTP in layer III.
Title: Hebbian synapses in visual cortex
Description:
We discovered in slices of rat visual cortex that reliable long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic responses in layer III could be elicited by theta burst stimulation delivered to a site in the middle of the cortical thickness, corresponding mainly to layer IV.
This synaptic plasticity was reflected in the extracellular field potentials and intracellular EPSPs in layer III, but was not observed in the intracellular responses of layer V neurons, suggesting a preferential involvement of synapses on layer III neurons.
Tetanus-induced LTP in this preparation was input specific, and was blocked by application of an NMDA receptor antagonist (but not by an antagonist of nitric oxide synthase).
In addition, LTP of layer IV-evoked responses could also be produced reliably by pairing low-frequency synaptic stimulation (approximately 100 pulses at 1 Hz) with strong intracellular depolarization of layer III neurons.
Thus, LTP in this circuit satisfies the definition of a “Hebbian” modification.
Tetanic stimulation of the white matter, in sharp contrast, consistently failed to elicit LTP in layer III unless a GABAA receptor antagonist was applied to the slice.
Analysis indicated that the critical difference between layer IV and white matter stimulation was not the magnitude of the responses to single stimuli delivered to the two sites, but that it might lie in the postsynaptic response during high-frequency stimulation.
Consistent with this idea, “associative” LTP could be elicited from white matter when converging but independent inputs from the white matter and layer IV simultaneously received tetanic conditioning stimulation.
A hypothetical model is presented to account for the differences between layer IV and white matter stimulation.
According to this “plasticity gate hypothesis,” inhibitory circuitry in layer IV normally acts as a sort of band-pass filter that constrains the types of activity patterns that can gain access to the modifiable synapses in layer III.
By stimulating in layer IV, we have bypassed this filter and therefore do not need to block GABAA receptors to achieve the threshold for LTP in layer III.
Related Results
Cortical neuron response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses
Cortical neuron response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses
AbstractSingle neocortical neurons are driven by populations of excitatory inputs, forming the basis of neural selectivity to features of sensory input. Excitatory connections are ...
Structural Heterogeneity of the GABAergic Tripartite Synapse
Structural Heterogeneity of the GABAergic Tripartite Synapse
The concept of the tripartite synapse describes the close interaction of pre- and postsynaptic elements and the surrounding astrocyte processes. For glutamatergic synapses, it is e...
FGF22 deletion causes hidden hearing loss by affecting the function of inner hair cell ribbon synapses
FGF22 deletion causes hidden hearing loss by affecting the function of inner hair cell ribbon synapses
Ribbon synapses are important structures in transmitting auditory signals from the inner hair cells (IHCs) to their corresponding spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). Over the last few ...
Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connections
Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connections
AbstractPhysiological (intracortical microstimulation) and anatomical (transport of horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin as shown by tetramethyl benzidine) ap...
Neural computation of visual imaging based on Kronecker product in the primary visual cortex
Neural computation of visual imaging based on Kronecker product in the primary visual cortex
Abstract
Background
What kind of neural computation is actually performed by the primary visual cortex and how is this represented mathematically...
Sensory experience steers representational drift in mouse visual cortex
Sensory experience steers representational drift in mouse visual cortex
AbstractRepresentational drift—the gradual continuous change of neuronal representations—has been observed across many brain areas. It is unclear whether drift is caused by synapti...
Sensory experience steers representational drift in mouse visual cortex
Sensory experience steers representational drift in mouse visual cortex
AbstractRepresentational drift – the gradual continuous change of neuronal representations – has been observed across many brain areas. It is unclear whether drift is caused by syn...
Deletion of p75NTR enhances the cholinergic innervation pattern of the visual cortex
Deletion of p75NTR enhances the cholinergic innervation pattern of the visual cortex
AbstractThe cholinergic system is involved in cortical plasticity, attention, and learning. Within the visual cortex the cholinergic system seems to play a role in visual perceptio...

