Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Multiple Interpretations of Rationality in Offender Decision Making
View through CrossRef
It is argued that, contrary to some criticisms, rational choice theory of criminal decision making has and should have a clear place for emotions as part of the decision-making process, as it had in classical treatises of Coornhert, Smith, and Bentham, as well as in modern formulations such as Elster’s. It appears that much disagreement is a consequence of a hidden difference of opinion on what the concept of “rational choice” contains or should contain and how it may or may not be used in explaining the occurrence of crime. This chapter provides clarity on this issue by discussing various elements that may have generated disagreement about content and scope of the rational choice approach. The chapter focuses on what is, could, or should be the contribution of rational choice theory to criminal choice theory.
Title: Multiple Interpretations of Rationality in Offender Decision Making
Description:
It is argued that, contrary to some criticisms, rational choice theory of criminal decision making has and should have a clear place for emotions as part of the decision-making process, as it had in classical treatises of Coornhert, Smith, and Bentham, as well as in modern formulations such as Elster’s.
It appears that much disagreement is a consequence of a hidden difference of opinion on what the concept of “rational choice” contains or should contain and how it may or may not be used in explaining the occurrence of crime.
This chapter provides clarity on this issue by discussing various elements that may have generated disagreement about content and scope of the rational choice approach.
The chapter focuses on what is, could, or should be the contribution of rational choice theory to criminal choice theory.
Related Results
Offender Rehabilitation Issues
Offender Rehabilitation Issues
Most of the studies that discuss offender rehabilitation focus on the debate over whether prison-based education programs work, ignoring the important issues that these programs un...
Rationality in Greek Thought
Rationality in Greek Thought
Abstract
Rationality in Greek Thought - a collection of specially written essays by leading international scholars - fundamentally re-examines ancient ideas of reaso...
Editors’ Introduction
Editors’ Introduction
Decision making is central to all human behavior, including criminal conduct. Virtually every discussion about crime or law enforcement is guided by beliefs about how people make d...
Rationality and Belief
Rationality and Belief
Abstract
This book gives a general theory of rational belief. Although it can be read by itself, it is a sequel to the author’s previous book, The Value of Rationali...
Victim Selection
Victim Selection
This chapter reviews what is known about victim selection—that is, the question of why offenders select some people, but not others, to be victims of crime. It first addresses theo...
High Stakes
High Stakes
This chapter describes the contradictory roles that weapons play in offender decision making as mechanisms that can both increase the physical harm to a victim of violence and also...
Decision Theory and Transformative Choice
Decision Theory and Transformative Choice
If rationality is the maximization of expected preference-satisfaction, it appears impossible to rationally decide to change one’s core preferences. For there is no stable set of p...

