Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Multiple Interpretations of Rationality in Offender Decision Making
View through CrossRef
It is argued that, contrary to some criticisms, rational choice theory of criminal decision making has and should have a clear place for emotions as part of the decision-making process, as it had in classical treatises of Coornhert, Smith, and Bentham, as well as in modern formulations such as Elster’s. It appears that much disagreement is a consequence of a hidden difference of opinion on what the concept of “rational choice” contains or should contain and how it may or may not be used in explaining the occurrence of crime. This chapter provides clarity on this issue by discussing various elements that may have generated disagreement about content and scope of the rational choice approach. The chapter focuses on what is, could, or should be the contribution of rational choice theory to criminal choice theory.
Title: Multiple Interpretations of Rationality in Offender Decision Making
Description:
It is argued that, contrary to some criticisms, rational choice theory of criminal decision making has and should have a clear place for emotions as part of the decision-making process, as it had in classical treatises of Coornhert, Smith, and Bentham, as well as in modern formulations such as Elster’s.
It appears that much disagreement is a consequence of a hidden difference of opinion on what the concept of “rational choice” contains or should contain and how it may or may not be used in explaining the occurrence of crime.
This chapter provides clarity on this issue by discussing various elements that may have generated disagreement about content and scope of the rational choice approach.
The chapter focuses on what is, could, or should be the contribution of rational choice theory to criminal choice theory.
Related Results
Rationality in Greek Thought
Rationality in Greek Thought
Abstract
Rationality in Greek Thought - a collection of specially written essays by leading international scholars - fundamentally re-examines ancient ideas of reaso...
Editors’ Introduction
Editors’ Introduction
Decision making is central to all human behavior, including criminal conduct. Virtually every discussion about crime or law enforcement is guided by beliefs about how people make d...
Emotions in Offender Decision Making
Emotions in Offender Decision Making
This chapter examines the influence of emotions on offender decision making. It reviews the empirical and theoretical criminological literature on the role of emotions in crime cau...
Rationality and Belief
Rationality and Belief
Abstract
This book gives a general theory of rational belief. Although it can be read by itself, it is a sequel to the author’s previous book, The Value of Rationali...
Shared decision-making, decision aids, and the role of values in treatment decision-making
Shared decision-making, decision aids, and the role of values in treatment decision-making
Shared decision-making (SDM) between physicians and patients is often advocated as the ‘best’ approach to treatment decision-making in the clinical encounter. In this chapter we de...
Dual-Process Models of Criminal Decision Making
Dual-Process Models of Criminal Decision Making
This chapter discusses the application of dual-process and dual-system models to offender decision making. It is argued that these models offer a more accurate account of the decis...
Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing
Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing
The study of behavioural decision-making has expanded into the area of accounting and auditing. This branch of research seeks to understand the cognitive processes that govern such...


