Javascript must be enabled to continue!
'Strangers' and Sanctuary in Sir Thomas More
View through CrossRef
I focus on the increasingly well-known immigrant speech, or “the stranger’s case,” in the play Sir Thomas More, widely agreed to be in Shakespeare’s hand. In its depiction of “Evil May Day” in 1517, Sir Thomas More stands before the gates of St. Martin Le Grand sanctuary space—home to a thriving migrant labor community—and dissuades xenophobic rioters from entering.<br><br>This passage has recently received extensive coverage. But no one has yet explored thoroughly its crucial sanctuary dimensions. More makes “the stranger’s case” at St. Martin’s threshold, a privileged zone protecting those taking formal sanctuary, and many foreigners (sometimes refugees) practicing their craft exempt from oppressive municipal and guild regulation. I read the speech and play in deep historical context, discussing sanctuary-dwelling immigrant communities through leases (in Westminster Abbey’s Muniments Library), crown licenses, and patents. I also make use of Shannon McSheffrey’s ongoing pioneering research.<br><br>The stranger’s case’s hypothetical energy—envisioning one’s own possible future as a stranger—was very much in England’s cultural bloodstream. Drawing on archival research, I analyze sixteenth-century legal and political defenses of sanctuary that employ proleptic and substitutional logics similar to More’s plea. More’s speech offers a key to understanding Londoners’ long-conflicting orientations toward sanctuary. <br><br>The stranger’s case emblematizes Shakespeare’s imaginative enterprise: to inhabit roles of others, to trade places. It is no coincidence that a sanctuary, foregrounded in the play, explicitly allows for this quintessential work of the theatre. The refuge protects other people, other possibilities, other plots. But Shakespeare emphasizes asylum’s vulnerability: it must be defended. Sanctuary’s boundaries here are ultimately only as strong as More’s speech. Sanctuary and drama mutually implicate and protect one another—extra-jurisdictional space is to thank for English theatre; drama, in turn, comes full circle to make the case for the specialness of such exempt spaces.
Title: 'Strangers' and Sanctuary in Sir Thomas More
Description:
I focus on the increasingly well-known immigrant speech, or “the stranger’s case,” in the play Sir Thomas More, widely agreed to be in Shakespeare’s hand.
In its depiction of “Evil May Day” in 1517, Sir Thomas More stands before the gates of St.
Martin Le Grand sanctuary space—home to a thriving migrant labor community—and dissuades xenophobic rioters from entering.
<br><br>This passage has recently received extensive coverage.
But no one has yet explored thoroughly its crucial sanctuary dimensions.
More makes “the stranger’s case” at St.
Martin’s threshold, a privileged zone protecting those taking formal sanctuary, and many foreigners (sometimes refugees) practicing their craft exempt from oppressive municipal and guild regulation.
I read the speech and play in deep historical context, discussing sanctuary-dwelling immigrant communities through leases (in Westminster Abbey’s Muniments Library), crown licenses, and patents.
I also make use of Shannon McSheffrey’s ongoing pioneering research.
<br><br>The stranger’s case’s hypothetical energy—envisioning one’s own possible future as a stranger—was very much in England’s cultural bloodstream.
Drawing on archival research, I analyze sixteenth-century legal and political defenses of sanctuary that employ proleptic and substitutional logics similar to More’s plea.
More’s speech offers a key to understanding Londoners’ long-conflicting orientations toward sanctuary.
<br><br>The stranger’s case emblematizes Shakespeare’s imaginative enterprise: to inhabit roles of others, to trade places.
It is no coincidence that a sanctuary, foregrounded in the play, explicitly allows for this quintessential work of the theatre.
The refuge protects other people, other possibilities, other plots.
But Shakespeare emphasizes asylum’s vulnerability: it must be defended.
Sanctuary’s boundaries here are ultimately only as strong as More’s speech.
Sanctuary and drama mutually implicate and protect one another—extra-jurisdictional space is to thank for English theatre; drama, in turn, comes full circle to make the case for the specialness of such exempt spaces.
Related Results
Sanctuary Cities
Sanctuary Cities
Sanctuary policies first emerged in the 1980s as a response to the Reagan administration’s denial of asylum claims for refugees from Guatemala and El Salvador. In response to a gro...
Sanctuary Cities
Sanctuary Cities
With sanctuary, and sanctuary-adjacent, policies now in existence worldwide, scholarship on these policies has now expanded beyond the United States and North America. In the Unite...
Health experiences of asylum seekers and refugees in Wales
Health experiences of asylum seekers and refugees in Wales
Abstract
There are concerns that people seeking sanctuary (asylum seekers and refugees) in Wales, UK, have unmet health needs a...
Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Strategies in Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary
Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Strategies in Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary
The study examines biodiversity of Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary, a crucial ecological region near Bhubaneswar in Odisha, India. Extending over the Khordha and Cuttack districts, the...
Minimizing competition by removing elephants from a degraded Ngulia rhino sanctuary, Kenya
Minimizing competition by removing elephants from a degraded Ngulia rhino sanctuary, Kenya
The Ngulia rhino sanctuary located in the central part of Tsavo West National Park (NP) is completely fenced within an area of 88 km 2 following its expansion from 62 km 2 in May 2...
Incidence of Second Primary Malignancies in Hairy Cell Leukemia: US Population-Based Study from 2000- 2021
Incidence of Second Primary Malignancies in Hairy Cell Leukemia: US Population-Based Study from 2000- 2021
Introduction:
Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by an indolent course but notable responsiveness to purine ana...
Busing & The Sanctuary City
Busing & The Sanctuary City
Sanctuary cities demonstrated notable legal resilience during the first Trump administration, withstanding legal and political pressure aimed at dismantling their policies. That re...
Dyads in networks: We (dis)like our partners' partners based on their anticipated indirect effects on us
Dyads in networks: We (dis)like our partners' partners based on their anticipated indirect effects on us
Research on close relationships often focuses on the dyad (e.g., dyads of romantic partners) and on how dyad members affect each other’s welfare. But dyads exist embedded in broade...

