Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

‘Now You Got Your Answer...’

View through CrossRef
Understanding the apparently effective bodily transformation by traditional Navajo healing rituals as the part of a consistent technological practice is, perhaps too quickly, perceived as undermining a foundation of western science in objectivity and logic. However, some of the differences that make a difference between Navajo and western technologies of the body may be due to contradictory spatiotemporal axioms for recognizing bodily boundaries. Attempting to explain what we don’t understand about a Navajo Shooting Way ceremony - our directly perceived experiences and talk in English about the ceremony by others - we draw analogies between the intentional bodily spaces cryptically described by Merleau-Ponty, linguistic studies of Navajo spatiality, and non-Euclidean projective geometry. We find that the Navajo healer takes a strong, phenomenological standpoint, but we also find much of what the healer tells us about her ceremony and its intended effect on bodies, to be nonsensical. However, we begin to hear more cogent sense in the healer’s words by means of spatial metaphors suggested by both the structure of the Navajo language and by projective geometry: codeterminative processes in place of dichotomies, ratio relationships in place of part/whole hierarchies, and manifesting temporalized space in place of linear, spatialized time.
Title: ‘Now You Got Your Answer...’
Description:
Understanding the apparently effective bodily transformation by traditional Navajo healing rituals as the part of a consistent technological practice is, perhaps too quickly, perceived as undermining a foundation of western science in objectivity and logic.
However, some of the differences that make a difference between Navajo and western technologies of the body may be due to contradictory spatiotemporal axioms for recognizing bodily boundaries.
Attempting to explain what we don’t understand about a Navajo Shooting Way ceremony - our directly perceived experiences and talk in English about the ceremony by others - we draw analogies between the intentional bodily spaces cryptically described by Merleau-Ponty, linguistic studies of Navajo spatiality, and non-Euclidean projective geometry.
We find that the Navajo healer takes a strong, phenomenological standpoint, but we also find much of what the healer tells us about her ceremony and its intended effect on bodies, to be nonsensical.
However, we begin to hear more cogent sense in the healer’s words by means of spatial metaphors suggested by both the structure of the Navajo language and by projective geometry: codeterminative processes in place of dichotomies, ratio relationships in place of part/whole hierarchies, and manifesting temporalized space in place of linear, spatialized time.

Related Results

Astrology, Astral Influences, and Occult Properties in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries
Astrology, Astral Influences, and Occult Properties in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries
The notion of natural “occult” is usually viewed by modern scholars as a tautological way of dealing with phenomena for which there was no current explanation. Consider how Molière...
Varieties Of Aesthetic Experience
Varieties Of Aesthetic Experience
The traditional business of aestheticians has been to supply an answer to the question, “What is art?” A single question is put, and apparently it is assumed—though recently the as...
Imitation and Piracy in Paisley Shawl Design, 1805–1870
Imitation and Piracy in Paisley Shawl Design, 1805–1870
Abstract Facilitated by increased trade between Asia and Europe, handwoven shawls from the Kashmir region of the Indian subcontinent became desirable clothing for Eu...
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
Swayed by the clear distinction between male and female genitalia, the question of how far these categories extend into human biology has attracted humans for centuries. This quest...
The Knossos Tablets
The Knossos Tablets
At last the cards are on the table. Palmer's book was intended to present the testimonia in support of his theory about the date of the Knossos tablets. His case was a simple one, ...
Opera talk: A philosophical ‘phantasie’
Opera talk: A philosophical ‘phantasie’
The train of thought that I wish to pursue here was initiated by Edward T. Cone's recent essay ‘The World of Opera and its Inhabitants’. To the extent that my views diverge from hi...
Do tiny contributions make a difference? Reply to Barnett
Do tiny contributions make a difference? Reply to Barnett
Abstract Barnett’s 2017 paper ‘No free lunch’, the answer is ‘yes’: even tiny contributions can make a morally relevant difference. To defend this answer, Barnett ra...
Subjected Subjects? On Judith Butler's Paradox of Interpellation
Subjected Subjects? On Judith Butler's Paradox of Interpellation
Judith Butler's theory of the constitution of subjectivity conceptualizes the subject as a performative materialization of its social environment. In her theory Butler utilizes Lou...

Back to Top