Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning

View through CrossRef
For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified. However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.e., pan-cancers. In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples from the respective normal samples in pan-cancers. We collected whole genome methylation data of 27 cancer types containing 10,140 cancer samples and 3386 normal samples, and divided all samples into five data sets, including one training data set, one validation data set and three test data sets. We applied machine learning to identify DNA methylation markers, and specifically, we constructed diagnostic prediction models by deep learning. We identified two categories of markers: 12 CpG markers and 13 promoter markers. Three of 12 CpG markers and four of 13 promoter markers locate at cancer-related genes. With the CpG markers, our model achieved an average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets as 92.8% and 90.1%, respectively. For promoter markers, the average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets were 89.8% and 81.1%, respectively. Furthermore, in cell-free DNA methylation data of 163 prostate cancer samples, the CpG markers achieved the sensitivity as 100%, and the promoter markers achieved 92%. For both marker types, the specificity of normal whole blood was 100%. To conclude, we identified methylation markers to diagnose pan-cancers, which might be applied to liquid biopsy of cancers.
Title: DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning
Description:
For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified.
However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.
e.
, pan-cancers.
In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples from the respective normal samples in pan-cancers.
We collected whole genome methylation data of 27 cancer types containing 10,140 cancer samples and 3386 normal samples, and divided all samples into five data sets, including one training data set, one validation data set and three test data sets.
We applied machine learning to identify DNA methylation markers, and specifically, we constructed diagnostic prediction models by deep learning.
We identified two categories of markers: 12 CpG markers and 13 promoter markers.
Three of 12 CpG markers and four of 13 promoter markers locate at cancer-related genes.
With the CpG markers, our model achieved an average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets as 92.
8% and 90.
1%, respectively.
For promoter markers, the average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets were 89.
8% and 81.
1%, respectively.
Furthermore, in cell-free DNA methylation data of 163 prostate cancer samples, the CpG markers achieved the sensitivity as 100%, and the promoter markers achieved 92%.
For both marker types, the specificity of normal whole blood was 100%.
To conclude, we identified methylation markers to diagnose pan-cancers, which might be applied to liquid biopsy of cancers.

Related Results

Abstract 1289: Crosstalk between methylation and alternative splicing in cancer
Abstract 1289: Crosstalk between methylation and alternative splicing in cancer
Abstract Background: DNA methylation in promoter regions leads to transcriptional silencing, such as of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. However, the functions of D...
Abstract A37: Aberrant DNA methylation of HTATIP2 and UCH-L1 as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract A37: Aberrant DNA methylation of HTATIP2 and UCH-L1 as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignancy of bile duct epithelial cell lining. In the past decade, the incidence and mortality rates of CCA have been increas...
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Abstract Background: Age-associated epigenetic alteration is the underlying cause of DNA damage in aging cells. Two types of youth-associated DNA-protection epigenetic mark...
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Introduction: The United States currently faces two opioid crises, an evolved crisis currently manifesting as widespread abuse of illicit opioids, and a crisis in pain management l...
Comparative Promoter Methylation Analysis of p53 Target Genes in Urogenital Cancers
Comparative Promoter Methylation Analysis of p53 Target Genes in Urogenital Cancers
<i>Introduction:</i> The methylation status of selected new p53 target genes in bladder, kidney and testicular cancer was investigated to find similarities in methylati...

Back to Top