Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Vaginal Vault Closure Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique – A Comparative Study
View through CrossRef
Objectives:
Vault closure is the final step to hysterectomy, protecting the abdominal cavity from the exterior environment. Thus, closure becomes crucial in preventing ascend of infection to the peritoneal cavity. Our study aims to compare vault closure between laparoscopic and vaginal routes, their operating time, and postoperative complications.
Materials and Methods:
The ambispective comparative study was done in a tertiary care teaching center from June 2016 to December 2022. Three hundred and forty-four patients were included in the study that underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Interventions – Patients who had laparoscopic vault closure were in Group 1 (
N
= 198) and those who had vaginal closure were in Group 2 (
N
= 146). The results were compared. It included age, body mass index of the patient, the indication of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, size of the uterus, time taken during vault closure, and postoperative complications.
Results:
The time taken by laparoscopic vault repair was significantly less than vaginal repair (19.7 ± 13.3 min vs. 30.1 ± 6.6 min,
P
< 0.001). There was postoperative vault infection (2.7%), vault hematoma (1.3%), and no vault prolapse seen in vaginal repair. The organisms isolated were mainly
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
,
Escherichia coli
, and
Klebsiella
.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic vault closure has shown significantly improved results compared to vaginal route repair.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Vaginal Vault Closure Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique – A Comparative Study
Description:
Objectives:
Vault closure is the final step to hysterectomy, protecting the abdominal cavity from the exterior environment.
Thus, closure becomes crucial in preventing ascend of infection to the peritoneal cavity.
Our study aims to compare vault closure between laparoscopic and vaginal routes, their operating time, and postoperative complications.
Materials and Methods:
The ambispective comparative study was done in a tertiary care teaching center from June 2016 to December 2022.
Three hundred and forty-four patients were included in the study that underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Interventions – Patients who had laparoscopic vault closure were in Group 1 (
N
= 198) and those who had vaginal closure were in Group 2 (
N
= 146).
The results were compared.
It included age, body mass index of the patient, the indication of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, size of the uterus, time taken during vault closure, and postoperative complications.
Results:
The time taken by laparoscopic vault repair was significantly less than vaginal repair (19.
7 ± 13.
3 min vs.
30.
1 ± 6.
6 min,
P
< 0.
001).
There was postoperative vault infection (2.
7%), vault hematoma (1.
3%), and no vault prolapse seen in vaginal repair.
The organisms isolated were mainly
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
,
Escherichia coli
, and
Klebsiella
.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic vault closure has shown significantly improved results compared to vaginal route repair.
Related Results
Issues around vaginal vault closure
Issues around vaginal vault closure
Key content
Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD), vault prolapse, vaginal cuff granulation and infected vault haematoma are adverse events following hysterectomy.
There are several app...
Use of vault drainage for reducing vault haematoma during vaginal hysterectomy
Use of vault drainage for reducing vault haematoma during vaginal hysterectomy
A hysterectomy may be performed via abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal or vaginal approaches. Vaginal hysterectomy is associated with lower morbidity, faster re...
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: A prospective trial.
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: A prospective trial.
Objective: To compare the technique of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) in order to identify the procedure with better ou...
ABDOMINAL VERSUS VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
ABDOMINAL VERSUS VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
Objective: To evaluate abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in relation to operative and post operative complications.Design: Single centre cross sectional study. Place and durati...
To Compare the Effectiveness of Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and McCall's Culdoplasty during Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
To Compare the Effectiveness of Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and McCall's Culdoplasty during Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Vaginal vault prolapse can be prevented by supporting the vaginal cuff, which is an essential part of hysterectomy, whether done abdominally or vaginally. The...
Q-RUSH Hysterectomy: A Mini Review of a Novel, Rapid, and Vault-Supportive Modification of Traditional Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Q-RUSH Hysterectomy: A Mini Review of a Novel, Rapid, and Vault-Supportive Modification of Traditional Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Background: Total abdominal hysterectomy often requires multiple sequential pedicle clamps and separate vault suspension steps, which can prolong operative time, increase surgeon f...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Purohit technique of vaginal hysterectomy: a new approach performed in 214 patients
Purohit technique of vaginal hysterectomy: a new approach performed in 214 patients
ABSTRACTObjectives To study the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the newly designed Purohit technique for vaginal hysterectomy.Design Prospective observational study.Setting...

