Long-term observations of rheumatic carditis

AbstractA total of 246 consecutive patients were seen with the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever (and/or rheumatic heart disease) and were followed for 587.7 patient years. The episode of acute rheumatic fever was the first in 64 of these patients, whereas recurrent acute rheumatic fever was seen in 26 and the other 156 patients had chronic rheumatic carditis. At presentation, those suffering an initial attack had less frequent and less severe carditis when compared to those suffering recurrent infection (p<0.05). Improvement in carditis during follow-up was noted in those having an initial attack (p<0.1), while deterioration occurred following recurrent infection (p<0.01), and no change was noted for those with chronic infection. Recurrences of acute rheumatic fever were most frequent in those presenting with their initial infection (21%) or reinfection (35%), and dropout from follow-up was highest in the group with first infection (38%) compared to those with recurrent infection (15%) and chronic carditis (25%). Non-recognition of the first episode of acute rheumatic fever and failure of secondary prophylaxis were found to be the major contributors to the observed increased pool of recurrent and chronic rheumatic heart disease. We conclude that, in the absence of programmed primary prophylaxis of acute rheumatic fever, the best chance of controlling the progression of carditis or affecting cure is to recognize the first episode ofacute rheumatic fever and then ensure strict adherence to secondary prophylaxis. Since the prognosis of recurrent carditis is poor, the best management of moderate to severe recurrent carditis is early reparative valvar surgery wherever possible.