Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of late oral feeding with early oral feeding after stoma reversal.
View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare early and late oral feeding after ileostomy closure in terms of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Department of Surgery Unit, Leady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Period: July 2020 to January 2021. Material & Methods: All patients with stoma 226 (113 in each group) were observed. Patients were randomly divided into two categories. In the early postoperative period (within 24 hours of surgery), Group A permitted oral feeding. Group B who preserved "nil by mouth" for up to 72 hours during the post-operative phase. Patients were held null by mouth in the post-operative phase, while intravenous antibiotics and fluids were listed in both groups for up to the duration. In group A within 24 hours and in group B after 72 hours, 30 ml of liquid per hour was started orally. Follow-up was taken after the 7th day post-operative. The frequency of anastomotic leakage between the two groups was assessed and safety was defined based on anastomotic leakage. Results: The mean age in Group A was 42 years SD ± 6.94 for this analysis, while the mean age in Group B was 44 years SD +6.15. In 90 % of patients, more than Group A (early oral feeding) was safe, whereas Group B (late oral feeding) was safe in 86% of anastomotic leakage patients. Conclusion: Our research concludes that early oral feeding is better in terms of anastomotic leaks compared to late oral feeding after ileostomy closure.
Independent Medical Trust
Title: Comparison of late oral feeding with early oral feeding after stoma reversal.
Description:
Objective: To compare early and late oral feeding after ileostomy closure in terms of postoperative anastomotic leakage.
Study Design: Randomized Control Trial.
Setting: Department of Surgery Unit, Leady Reading Hospital Peshawar.
Period: July 2020 to January 2021.
Material & Methods: All patients with stoma 226 (113 in each group) were observed.
Patients were randomly divided into two categories.
In the early postoperative period (within 24 hours of surgery), Group A permitted oral feeding.
Group B who preserved "nil by mouth" for up to 72 hours during the post-operative phase.
Patients were held null by mouth in the post-operative phase, while intravenous antibiotics and fluids were listed in both groups for up to the duration.
In group A within 24 hours and in group B after 72 hours, 30 ml of liquid per hour was started orally.
Follow-up was taken after the 7th day post-operative.
The frequency of anastomotic leakage between the two groups was assessed and safety was defined based on anastomotic leakage.
Results: The mean age in Group A was 42 years SD ± 6.
94 for this analysis, while the mean age in Group B was 44 years SD +6.
15.
In 90 % of patients, more than Group A (early oral feeding) was safe, whereas Group B (late oral feeding) was safe in 86% of anastomotic leakage patients.
Conclusion: Our research concludes that early oral feeding is better in terms of anastomotic leaks compared to late oral feeding after ileostomy closure.
Related Results
Quality of Life in Stoma Patients: Appropriate and Inappropriate Stoma Sites
Quality of Life in Stoma Patients: Appropriate and Inappropriate Stoma Sites
AbstractBackgroundThe objective of the cross‐sectional study reported here was to compare the quality of life of patients with an appropriate stoma site and with that of patients w...
Experiences from practice: using a stoma output absorbent cartridge
Experiences from practice: using a stoma output absorbent cartridge
Having a stoma is a life-changing event, and it can be an overwhelming and difficult experience. It may be very challenging managing stoma care in certain occasions and, without th...
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Routine practice after bowel anastomoses has been to keep patient nil per oral till the return of bowel sound with a belief that this will prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting...
The Use of a Stoma Rod/Bridge to Prevent Retraction
The Use of a Stoma Rod/Bridge to Prevent Retraction
PURPOSE
We evaluated evidence related to the use of a rod (bridge) to prevent stoma retraction during loop ostomy construction.
METHOD...
Chemotherapy as a Risk Factor for Peristomal Skin Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Chemotherapy as a Risk Factor for Peristomal Skin Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Abstract
The study evaluated the impact of chemotherapy on the development and progression of peristomal skin disorders in stoma patients with malignant rectal tumors. This...
Quality of Life in Patients with Stoma
Quality of Life in Patients with Stoma
Objective: To determine the quality of life of patients with stoma at tertiary care Hospital.
Methodology: This prospective study has been conducted at the general surgery departme...
Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal
Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal
Objective: To compare the frequency of Surgical Site Infection ( SSI ) and mean length of hospital stay between the Purse-string closure and conventional primary closure techniques...
Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients
Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients
Objective:
Evaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure.
Background:
Stoma closure is a routine procedure...

