Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Research into an ecological compensation standard in the Minjiang River Basin under the combined scenario of ‘clear property rights, water quality and quantity, and opportunity cost’

View through CrossRef
Abstract Quantification methods of river basin ecological compensation with a scientific basis are not only a research hotspot in the field of resources and environment, but also an urgent technical difficulty needing to be solved in environmental management. The theory of property rights and externalities provides us with a new method to understand ecological compensation, which helps us to put forward a clear policy path to effectively solve the problem of ‘the tragedgy of the Commons’ in the ecological environment protection of river basins. Based on the externality problems of social and economic activities for a river basin, a standard calculation method under the combined scenario of ‘clear property rights, water quality and quantity, and opportunity cost’ was built in this paper. Taking the Minjiang River basin as an example, the definition of ecological property rights of the basin was divided into three scenarios: ‘upstream has pollution rights’, ‘upstream has no pollution rights’ and ‘upstream and downstream co-construction and sharing’. Ecological compensation standards of the Minjiang River basin under different property rights from 2015 to 2019 were calculated. The results showed that: (i) in the case where the upstream has pollution rights, the ecological compensation amount of Sanming City ranged from 2.41–9.36 × 108 Yuan, the final compensation value of Nanping City was 2.29–18.99 × 108 Yuan, and the ecological compensation cost of Fuzhou City was 6.78–28.35 × 108 Yuan; (ii) if the upstream area has no pollution rights, the compensation values of Sanming City and Nanping City to the downstream area were each 0; and (iii) under the case of upstream and downstream co-construction and sharing, the ecological compensation value of Sanming City was 6.25–21.34 × 108 Yuan, the final compensation value of Nanping City was 5.80–20.38 × 108 Yuan, and Fuzhou City needed to pay 12.05–36.38 × 108 Yuan for eco-compensation. The calculated results of ecological compensation standards in the Minjiang River basin indicated the amount of ecological compensation paid by the downstream to the upstream showing an upward trend on the whole. This method was relatively easy to define property rights and obtain data, taking into account the benefits of upstream and downstream, and the calculation process was relatively simple, which developed and supplemented the traditional ecological compensation method used for river basins.
Title: Research into an ecological compensation standard in the Minjiang River Basin under the combined scenario of ‘clear property rights, water quality and quantity, and opportunity cost’
Description:
Abstract Quantification methods of river basin ecological compensation with a scientific basis are not only a research hotspot in the field of resources and environment, but also an urgent technical difficulty needing to be solved in environmental management.
The theory of property rights and externalities provides us with a new method to understand ecological compensation, which helps us to put forward a clear policy path to effectively solve the problem of ‘the tragedgy of the Commons’ in the ecological environment protection of river basins.
Based on the externality problems of social and economic activities for a river basin, a standard calculation method under the combined scenario of ‘clear property rights, water quality and quantity, and opportunity cost’ was built in this paper.
Taking the Minjiang River basin as an example, the definition of ecological property rights of the basin was divided into three scenarios: ‘upstream has pollution rights’, ‘upstream has no pollution rights’ and ‘upstream and downstream co-construction and sharing’.
Ecological compensation standards of the Minjiang River basin under different property rights from 2015 to 2019 were calculated.
The results showed that: (i) in the case where the upstream has pollution rights, the ecological compensation amount of Sanming City ranged from 2.
41–9.
36 × 108 Yuan, the final compensation value of Nanping City was 2.
29–18.
99 × 108 Yuan, and the ecological compensation cost of Fuzhou City was 6.
78–28.
35 × 108 Yuan; (ii) if the upstream area has no pollution rights, the compensation values of Sanming City and Nanping City to the downstream area were each 0; and (iii) under the case of upstream and downstream co-construction and sharing, the ecological compensation value of Sanming City was 6.
25–21.
34 × 108 Yuan, the final compensation value of Nanping City was 5.
80–20.
38 × 108 Yuan, and Fuzhou City needed to pay 12.
05–36.
38 × 108 Yuan for eco-compensation.
The calculated results of ecological compensation standards in the Minjiang River basin indicated the amount of ecological compensation paid by the downstream to the upstream showing an upward trend on the whole.
This method was relatively easy to define property rights and obtain data, taking into account the benefits of upstream and downstream, and the calculation process was relatively simple, which developed and supplemented the traditional ecological compensation method used for river basins.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Landscape Feature Extraction and Floristic Division of Traditional Villages in the Minjiang River Basin
Landscape Feature Extraction and Floristic Division of Traditional Villages in the Minjiang River Basin
<span>Traditional villages reflect the integration and collision of cultures from many aspects such as culture, function and site selection, and reflect the cooperation and s...
Evapotranspiration Variations of the Minjiang River Basin in Southeastern China from 2000 to 2019
Evapotranspiration Variations of the Minjiang River Basin in Southeastern China from 2000 to 2019
Evapotranspiration is one of the critical processes in the terrestrial hydrological cycle, and the assessment of evapotranspiration is essential for understanding the regional hydr...
Impacts of dam construction on river channel evolution: a case of Minjiang River in Southeastern China
Impacts of dam construction on river channel evolution: a case of Minjiang River in Southeastern China
The Minjiang River is the largest river in Fujian Province. In 1993, the Shuikou Reservoir, which has an effective storage capacity of 700 million m 3 ...
Developing ecological compensation standards for water resources: evidence from the Enshi section of the Qingjiang River Basin
Developing ecological compensation standards for water resources: evidence from the Enshi section of the Qingjiang River Basin
River basin ecological compensation is a major strategic decision and deployment made by the Party Central Committee and the State Council.It is of great significance to balance th...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...

Back to Top