Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A case‐series comparison of semantic control in the logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundSemantic cognition requires both semantic representation (conceptual knowledge), and semantic control (the ability to shape and manipulate information for a particular context/task) (Lambon Ralph, Jefferies, Patterson, & Rogers, 2017). Prior investigations have contrasted the semantic representation loss in semantic dementia with semantic control deficits in post‐stroke semantic aphasia (SA) (Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006; Thompson et al., 2022). The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) has neuroanatomical commonalities with SA, including damage centred on the left temporoparietal and inferior frontal regions, and neuropsychological commonalities including executive and language impairments. Accordingly, we investigated whether lvPPA impairs semantic control.MethodWe compared 12 individuals with lvPPA, 9 with typical amnestic Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and 12 age‐matched healthy controls on a battery of verbal and non‐verbal semantic, language, memory and executive functioning tests.ResultThe lvPPA patients spanned multiple levels of performance across the different tests and showed the characteristic features of a semantic control deficit: (i) They showed impairments in tests that require greater semantic demand (e.g., semantic association knowledge test more than straightforward word‐picture matching); (ii) only lvPPA patients showed strong correlations between semantic and executive tests; (iii) an effect of item familiarity was not found in lvPPA patients; and (iv) both lvPPA and AD patients benefited from phonemic cueing on the Boston Naming Test.ConclusionLvPPA patients’ performance on semantic tests is similar to that of previously reported SA, suggesting an impairment of semantic control. Imaging analysis is underway and will be available at the AAIC conference.
References:Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case‐series comparison. Brain, 129(Pt 8), 2132‐2147. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl153
Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci, 18(1), 42‐55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150
Thompson, H. E., Noonan, K. A., Halai, A. D., Hoffman, P., Stampacchia, S., Hallam, G., . . . Jefferies, E. (2022). Damage to temporoparietal cortex is sufficient for impaired semantic control. Cortex, 156, 71‐85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.022
Title: A case‐series comparison of semantic control in the logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease
Description:
AbstractBackgroundSemantic cognition requires both semantic representation (conceptual knowledge), and semantic control (the ability to shape and manipulate information for a particular context/task) (Lambon Ralph, Jefferies, Patterson, & Rogers, 2017).
Prior investigations have contrasted the semantic representation loss in semantic dementia with semantic control deficits in post‐stroke semantic aphasia (SA) (Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006; Thompson et al.
, 2022).
The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) has neuroanatomical commonalities with SA, including damage centred on the left temporoparietal and inferior frontal regions, and neuropsychological commonalities including executive and language impairments.
Accordingly, we investigated whether lvPPA impairs semantic control.
MethodWe compared 12 individuals with lvPPA, 9 with typical amnestic Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and 12 age‐matched healthy controls on a battery of verbal and non‐verbal semantic, language, memory and executive functioning tests.
ResultThe lvPPA patients spanned multiple levels of performance across the different tests and showed the characteristic features of a semantic control deficit: (i) They showed impairments in tests that require greater semantic demand (e.
g.
, semantic association knowledge test more than straightforward word‐picture matching); (ii) only lvPPA patients showed strong correlations between semantic and executive tests; (iii) an effect of item familiarity was not found in lvPPA patients; and (iv) both lvPPA and AD patients benefited from phonemic cueing on the Boston Naming Test.
ConclusionLvPPA patients’ performance on semantic tests is similar to that of previously reported SA, suggesting an impairment of semantic control.
Imaging analysis is underway and will be available at the AAIC conference.
References:Jefferies, E.
, & Lambon Ralph, M.
A.
(2006).
Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case‐series comparison.
Brain, 129(Pt 8), 2132‐2147.
https://doi.
org/10.
1093/brain/awl153
Lambon Ralph, M.
A.
, Jefferies, E.
, Patterson, K.
, & Rogers, T.
T.
(2017).
The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition.
Nat Rev Neurosci, 18(1), 42‐55.
https://doi.
org/10.
1038/nrn.
2016.
150
Thompson, H.
E.
, Noonan, K.
A.
, Halai, A.
D.
, Hoffman, P.
, Stampacchia, S.
, Hallam, G.
, .
.
.
Jefferies, E.
(2022).
Damage to temporoparietal cortex is sufficient for impaired semantic control.
Cortex, 156, 71‐85.
https://doi.
org/10.
1016/j.
cortex.
2022.
05.
022.
Related Results
Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Abstract
We investigated semantic cognition in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, including (i) the status of verbal and non-verbal semantic pe...
Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia
Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia
Abstract
The primary progressive aphasias are rare, language-led dementias, with three main variants: semantic, non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic. Although the ...
Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia
Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia
Abstract
The primary progressive aphasias are rare, language-led dementias, with three main variants: semantic, non-fluent/agrammatic, and logopenic. Whilst semanti...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Characteristics of Aphasia in Ischemic Stroke Patients at Dr. Mahar Mardjono National Brain Center Hospital Indonesia in 2021
Characteristics of Aphasia in Ischemic Stroke Patients at Dr. Mahar Mardjono National Brain Center Hospital Indonesia in 2021
Highlights:
1. To author’s knowledge, this study is the first study done in National Brain Center Hospital In Jakarta2. No similar studies have been done during the pandemic era3. ...
Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Abstract
We investigated semantic cognition in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), including (i) the status of verbal a...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
AbstractKnowledge of the frequency and remission of aphasia is essential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients and provides insight into the brain organization of language. We ...

