SPECTER-Based Semantic Triage of Biomedical Literature for Systematic Reviews in Mutational Signature Analysis

Abstract Systematic reviews in computational biology require screening large heterogeneous bibliographic sets, especially when topics span computational methods, cancer genomics and statistical modelling. This paper presents a reproducible semantic triage pipeline that combines SPECTER scientific-document embeddings, research-question similarity, proposal-summary similarity and domain keyword coverage to rank candidate studies for systematic review screening. The pipeline was evaluated on 2,231 Covidence records, including 120 final included studies (prevalence = 5.38%), against keyword-only, TF-IDF, BM25, MiniLM, PubMedBERT and SPECTER-only baselines. SPECTER-hybrid achieved the highest average precision (AP = 0.546), recovered 50% of included studies after screening 4.48% of records, and produced an 11.16-fold enrichment over prevalence. Ablation analysis showed that semantic-keyword combinations consistently outperformed single-signal variants. These findings suggest that citation-informed hybrid ranking can support literature triage while retaining human reviewers as final decision-makers.