Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Baumgarten, Kant, and the Subdivisions of Practical Philosophy
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter analyzes a specific passage from Kant’s note to §88 of Baumgarten’s Elements of First Practical Philosophy, where Kant offers a triadic classification of (i) inner freedom under inner laws; and outer freedom under (ii) inner and (iii) outer laws, a classification which appears perplexing in light of his later division of practical philosophy into right and virtue. While virtue seems to map onto the first distinction, and right the third, there is no obvious match for the second. This chapter investigates whether this second category implies the same actions viewed from the perspective of inner laws or if it indicates two distinct forms of outer freedom subject to different laws. Emphasizing Kant’s priority of freedom over perfectionism, the study explores how Kant adopted and adapted Baumgarten’s distinctions, highlighting the tension between inner and outer distinctions that persists in Kant’s final division between right and virtue in the Metaphysics of Morals.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Baumgarten, Kant, and the Subdivisions of Practical Philosophy
Description:
Abstract
This chapter analyzes a specific passage from Kant’s note to §88 of Baumgarten’s Elements of First Practical Philosophy, where Kant offers a triadic classification of (i) inner freedom under inner laws; and outer freedom under (ii) inner and (iii) outer laws, a classification which appears perplexing in light of his later division of practical philosophy into right and virtue.
While virtue seems to map onto the first distinction, and right the third, there is no obvious match for the second.
This chapter investigates whether this second category implies the same actions viewed from the perspective of inner laws or if it indicates two distinct forms of outer freedom subject to different laws.
Emphasizing Kant’s priority of freedom over perfectionism, the study explores how Kant adopted and adapted Baumgarten’s distinctions, highlighting the tension between inner and outer distinctions that persists in Kant’s final division between right and virtue in the Metaphysics of Morals.
Related Results
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
Perfection and Self-Perfection in Baumgarten and Kant
Perfection and Self-Perfection in Baumgarten and Kant
Abstract
The debate on whether Kant’s duties of justice derive from the fundamental principle of morality akin to his ethical duties has persisted, with some scholar...
Immanuel Kant: Ethics
Immanuel Kant: Ethics
The ethical theory of Immanuel Kant (b. 1724–d. 1804) exerted a powerful influence on the subsequent history of philosophy and continues to be a dominant approach to ethics, rivali...
Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash
The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...
Imputation
Imputation
Abstract
This chapter underscores the importance of being able to the norms of practical philosophy in concrete circumstances, particularly as relevant to Kant’s mor...
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
In this work, a general definition, meaning, and importance of engineering are expressed generally, and the main branches of engineering are briefly discussed. The concept of techn...
Three Models of Natural Right
Three Models of Natural Right
Abstract
In the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant locates the Rechtslehre in the realm of the “systematic knowledge of the doctrine of natural right (Ius naturae).” Howeve...
Baumgarten and Kant on Conscience
Baumgarten and Kant on Conscience
Abstract
Both Baumgarten and Kant adopt a legalistic perspective in ethics, emphasizing the significance of imputation and judgment. They both regard moral conscienc...

