Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Fermentative losses and chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn grain silage rehydrated with water or acid whey combined with bacterial-enzymatic inoculant

View through CrossRef
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of rehydration with water or acid whey, as well as the effects of bacterial-enzymatic inoculant on fermentation losses, aerobic stability, and chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn grain silages. The treatments consisted of corn kernels (Zea mays) ground through a 3-mm sieve and rehydrated with chlorine-free water or unsalted whey (NaCl) combined or not with bacterial-enzymatic inoculant. This was a 2 x 2 factorial completely randomized design with sources of rehydration (water or whey) and absence and presence of bacterial-enzymatic inoculant with eight replications. Water and acid whey were added to ground corn with 12% moisture in order to increase it to 35%. Rehydrated corn was ensiled in Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) minisilos and stored for 60 d. The bacterial-enzymatic inoculant used was composed of Lactobacillus curvatus, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. buchneri, L. lactis, Pediococcus acidilactici, Propionibacterium acidipropionici and Enterococcus faecium, in concentrations of 1010 CFU g-1 and 5% cellulose-based enzyme complex. The aerobic exposure of silages was evaluated for 120 hours. There was interaction (P = 0.02) between the sources of rehydration and the use or not of the inoculant on the values of silage temperature during aerobic exposure. There was a difference for dry matter (DM) losses (P=0.38) between rehydrated corn silages with and without inoculant. DM losses were 37.51% higher in silage without inoculant compared to silage with inoculant (3.84% DM). There was no difference between the sources of rehydration on DM losses (P = 0.39), with a mean value of 4.99%. Corn rehydration using acid whey (P < 0.01) increased 2.19% and 31.36% DM and ash content compared to water, an average of 66.14% and 1.28%, respectively. There was no interaction (P = 0.30) between the sources of rehydration and the use of inoculants on the in vitro digestibility of DM (mean of 79.26%). The use of the bacterial-enzymatic inoculant improved the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and nutritional value of corn grain silage rehydrated with water or whey.
Title: Fermentative losses and chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn grain silage rehydrated with water or acid whey combined with bacterial-enzymatic inoculant
Description:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of rehydration with water or acid whey, as well as the effects of bacterial-enzymatic inoculant on fermentation losses, aerobic stability, and chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn grain silages.
The treatments consisted of corn kernels (Zea mays) ground through a 3-mm sieve and rehydrated with chlorine-free water or unsalted whey (NaCl) combined or not with bacterial-enzymatic inoculant.
This was a 2 x 2 factorial completely randomized design with sources of rehydration (water or whey) and absence and presence of bacterial-enzymatic inoculant with eight replications.
Water and acid whey were added to ground corn with 12% moisture in order to increase it to 35%.
Rehydrated corn was ensiled in Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) minisilos and stored for 60 d.
The bacterial-enzymatic inoculant used was composed of Lactobacillus curvatus, L.
acidophilus, L.
plantarum, L.
buchneri, L.
lactis, Pediococcus acidilactici, Propionibacterium acidipropionici and Enterococcus faecium, in concentrations of 1010 CFU g-1 and 5% cellulose-based enzyme complex.
The aerobic exposure of silages was evaluated for 120 hours.
There was interaction (P = 0.
02) between the sources of rehydration and the use or not of the inoculant on the values of silage temperature during aerobic exposure.
There was a difference for dry matter (DM) losses (P=0.
38) between rehydrated corn silages with and without inoculant.
DM losses were 37.
51% higher in silage without inoculant compared to silage with inoculant (3.
84% DM).
There was no difference between the sources of rehydration on DM losses (P = 0.
39), with a mean value of 4.
99%.
Corn rehydration using acid whey (P < 0.
01) increased 2.
19% and 31.
36% DM and ash content compared to water, an average of 66.
14% and 1.
28%, respectively.
There was no interaction (P = 0.
30) between the sources of rehydration and the use of inoculants on the in vitro digestibility of DM (mean of 79.
26%).
The use of the bacterial-enzymatic inoculant improved the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and nutritional value of corn grain silage rehydrated with water or whey.

Related Results

Fermentative profile and nutritive value of corn silage with Tamani guinea grass
Fermentative profile and nutritive value of corn silage with Tamani guinea grass
The use of silage has been an efficient alternative to feed supply during the shortage of roughage in dry periods, providing quality feed that is widely used in ruminant feeding. T...
Value addition to acid whey from greek yogurt processing with millets (kodo and proso) for development of nutritious food products
Value addition to acid whey from greek yogurt processing with millets (kodo and proso) for development of nutritious food products
[EMBARGOED UNTIL 12/1/2023] The disconnect between massive demand and abundant supply of food has resulted in millions of people suffering from hunger and billion metric tons of fo...
Effects of microbial inoculant and fibrolytic enzymes on fermentation quality and nutritional value of BRS capiaçu grass silage
Effects of microbial inoculant and fibrolytic enzymes on fermentation quality and nutritional value of BRS capiaçu grass silage
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of bacterial-enzymatic inoculants with different concentrations of fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality and nutriti...
An evaluation of red clover silage for beef production
An evaluation of red clover silage for beef production
ABSTRACTTwo experiments have been conducted to compare wilted, formic acid-treated red clover and unwilted, formic acid-treated grass silages for beef production, and to examine th...

Back to Top