Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sælsomme beretninger i lægen og anatomen Thomas Bartholins skrifter

View through CrossRef
Jesper Brandt Andersen: Curious case reports in the works of the Danish physician and anatomist Thomas Bartholin Scattered through the voluminous authorship of the Danish physician and anatomist Thomas Bartholin (1616–1680), famous for his discovery of the lymph vessels in the early 1650s, case reports can be found, for which Bartholin was criticized and accused for verbosity and lack of scientific judgment by contemporary scholars and later medical historians. In this article 15 such case reports, mainly from the work Historiarum Anatomicarum Rariorum 1654–1661, are presented, analyzed and perspectivated. It is concluded, that much of the criticism, especially the one submitted by the posteriority and especially during the era of positivism by the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century and the one concerning observations made by Bartholin himself, is unjustified. When practising science himself Bartholin felt responsible for reproducing his observations correctly and trustworthy, and he was not satisfied by making conclusions on the basis of knowledge handed over by others. The author of this article has not succeded in finding one single example indicating that Bartholin doesn’t reproduce his own observations correctly and truthfully. On the other hand there are in his authorship numerous examples of case reports originating from others, which he either didn’t believe himself or at least doubted. When he published case reports originating from other people, he didn’t feel responsible for the truthfulness. His purpose bringing these case reports was to present his reader for new and interesting matter, to entertain his reader, to arouse his reader’s curiosity and to challenge his reader’s own judgment. Thomas Bartholin was one of the most excellent, diligent and passionate intermediaries of scientific matter of his time, and as a scientist he was characterized by openness. Often he was among the first to recognize, verify and publish new knowledge.
Title: Sælsomme beretninger i lægen og anatomen Thomas Bartholins skrifter
Description:
Jesper Brandt Andersen: Curious case reports in the works of the Danish physician and anatomist Thomas Bartholin Scattered through the voluminous authorship of the Danish physician and anatomist Thomas Bartholin (1616–1680), famous for his discovery of the lymph vessels in the early 1650s, case reports can be found, for which Bartholin was criticized and accused for verbosity and lack of scientific judgment by contemporary scholars and later medical historians.
In this article 15 such case reports, mainly from the work Historiarum Anatomicarum Rariorum 1654–1661, are presented, analyzed and perspectivated.
It is concluded, that much of the criticism, especially the one submitted by the posteriority and especially during the era of positivism by the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century and the one concerning observations made by Bartholin himself, is unjustified.
When practising science himself Bartholin felt responsible for reproducing his observations correctly and trustworthy, and he was not satisfied by making conclusions on the basis of knowledge handed over by others.
The author of this article has not succeded in finding one single example indicating that Bartholin doesn’t reproduce his own observations correctly and truthfully.
On the other hand there are in his authorship numerous examples of case reports originating from others, which he either didn’t believe himself or at least doubted.
When he published case reports originating from other people, he didn’t feel responsible for the truthfulness.
His purpose bringing these case reports was to present his reader for new and interesting matter, to entertain his reader, to arouse his reader’s curiosity and to challenge his reader’s own judgment.
Thomas Bartholin was one of the most excellent, diligent and passionate intermediaries of scientific matter of his time, and as a scientist he was characterized by openness.
Often he was among the first to recognize, verify and publish new knowledge.

Related Results

Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
This randomized clinical trial explores whether hormone intensification at start of androgen deprivation therapy alters selection of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations within ...
Representasi Makna Gaya Kepemimpinan Otoriter Tokoh Thomas Shelby dalam Film Serial Peaky Blinders
Representasi Makna Gaya Kepemimpinan Otoriter Tokoh Thomas Shelby dalam Film Serial Peaky Blinders
Abstract. A leader usually has a communication style that is quite interesting and unique according to his own leadership style. Leadership is a person's ability to influence other...
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy
Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet i...
Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19
Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19
ImportanceThe efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19.Design...
Recensioner
Recensioner
HELENE EHRIANDER & ANETTE ALMGREN WHITE (RED.) ASTRID LINDGRENS BILDVÄRLDARStockholm/Göteborg: Makadam, 2019 (Skrifter utgivna av Svenska barnboksinstitutet nr 149), 341 s.�...
Grundtvigs syn på forkyndelsen
Grundtvigs syn på forkyndelsen
Grundvig's Views on Preaching. By Regin Prenter. On the first pulpit in Grundtvig’s Church in Copenhagen is an inscription: “ Read out what is written, and bear witness to what tho...

Back to Top