Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cell Phone Searches by Employers
View through CrossRef
This Article presents a framework for analyzing searches of privately-owned and employer-owned cell phones by both public and private employers. For employee-owned cell phones, this Article argues that such devices are entitled to the greatest constitutional protection under relevant Fourth Amendment precedent, including Riley v. California, and are typically beyond the reach of the Fourth Amendment’s workplace exception, making them generally immune from search by public employers. Given the highly offensive nature of personal cell phone searches, this Article further argues that private employers would typically face liability in tort for most personal cell phone searches. Nevertheless, for both types of employers, this Article contends that limited searches of personal cell phones might be permissible if an employer has implemented a clear and narrow policy authorizing such searches, to which employees have voluntarily consented, that is itself justified by a legitimate business need to manage or review particular employment-related data contained within the phone. <br><br>For employer-owned cell phones, this Article recognizes that employees often cannot expect privacy in such devices vis-à-vis their employers, particularly where an employer’s policy permits their inspection, making them more freely searchable by employers. Nevertheless, in cases where an employee could reasonably expect privacy in an employer-issued cell phone, as in certain instances where the employee is the exclusive user of the device, this Article argues that employers should conduct such searches in a reasonable manner. Accordingly, for either public or private employers, this Article argues that when an employer wishes to search an employer-issued device, the employer should ensure it has a strong business justification for the search, should limit its search to avoid accessing private information unrelated to the intrusion’s justifications, and should select the least intrusive means available for conducting the search. In the end, determining whether an employer may lawfully search or seize the contents of an employee’s cell phone must be done on a case-by-case basis. However, the principles identified in this Article will serve as helpful guides for employers and reviewing courts in specific cases.
Title: Cell Phone Searches by Employers
Description:
This Article presents a framework for analyzing searches of privately-owned and employer-owned cell phones by both public and private employers.
For employee-owned cell phones, this Article argues that such devices are entitled to the greatest constitutional protection under relevant Fourth Amendment precedent, including Riley v.
California, and are typically beyond the reach of the Fourth Amendment’s workplace exception, making them generally immune from search by public employers.
Given the highly offensive nature of personal cell phone searches, this Article further argues that private employers would typically face liability in tort for most personal cell phone searches.
Nevertheless, for both types of employers, this Article contends that limited searches of personal cell phones might be permissible if an employer has implemented a clear and narrow policy authorizing such searches, to which employees have voluntarily consented, that is itself justified by a legitimate business need to manage or review particular employment-related data contained within the phone.
<br><br>For employer-owned cell phones, this Article recognizes that employees often cannot expect privacy in such devices vis-à-vis their employers, particularly where an employer’s policy permits their inspection, making them more freely searchable by employers.
Nevertheless, in cases where an employee could reasonably expect privacy in an employer-issued cell phone, as in certain instances where the employee is the exclusive user of the device, this Article argues that employers should conduct such searches in a reasonable manner.
Accordingly, for either public or private employers, this Article argues that when an employer wishes to search an employer-issued device, the employer should ensure it has a strong business justification for the search, should limit its search to avoid accessing private information unrelated to the intrusion’s justifications, and should select the least intrusive means available for conducting the search.
In the end, determining whether an employer may lawfully search or seize the contents of an employee’s cell phone must be done on a case-by-case basis.
However, the principles identified in this Article will serve as helpful guides for employers and reviewing courts in specific cases.
Related Results
Rethinking Student Cell Phone Searches
Rethinking Student Cell Phone Searches
In Fourth Amendment analysis, warrants are ordinarily required to search for evidence of criminal wrongdoing. However, under the warrant requirement’s search-incident-to-arrest ex...
The impact of response timing, mobile telephone use, and data collection tools on survey bias : evidence from Rakai, Uganda
The impact of response timing, mobile telephone use, and data collection tools on survey bias : evidence from Rakai, Uganda
<p dir="ltr"><b>Background</b></p><p dir="ltr">A credible public health survey or surveillance program is judged by its ability to measure intended ou...
The impact of response timing, mobile telephone use, and data collection tools on survey bias : evidence from Rakai, Uganda
The impact of response timing, mobile telephone use, and data collection tools on survey bias : evidence from Rakai, Uganda
<p dir="ltr"><b>Background</b></p><p dir="ltr">A credible public health survey or surveillance program is judged by its ability to measure intended ou...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Parent's Perception Regarding the Effects of Excessive Use of Mobile Phone on Children's Health: A Sociological Study in City Dera Ghazi Khan
Parent's Perception Regarding the Effects of Excessive Use of Mobile Phone on Children's Health: A Sociological Study in City Dera Ghazi Khan
The use of mobile phones among children has major effects on their health. Excessive and unrestricted use of mobile phones can contribute to various physical and psychological prob...
Cellular Telephone Use: A Survey Of College Business Students
Cellular Telephone Use: A Survey Of College Business Students
Whether it is hand held, in a pocket, on a backpack, clipped to a belt, or hidden in a brief case or purse, college students and cellular telephones go together. Communication wit...
Mobile phone usage for m‐learning: comparing heavy and light mobile phone users
Mobile phone usage for m‐learning: comparing heavy and light mobile phone users
PurposeMobile technologies offer the opportunity to embed learning in a natural environment. The objective of the study is to examine how the usage of mobile phones for m‐learning ...

