Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Expert Witness Testimony
View through CrossRef
Courts often seek testimony and opinions about case facts from expert witnesses. These witnesses are distinguished from other types of court witnesses by virtue of their knowledge, expertise, and the opportunity to testify to opinions. Expert witness testimony is guided by legal rules and procedures. Rules regarding expert testimony focus on ensuring expert testimony is relevant to the case, is based on valid and reliable methods, and will be helpful in aiding the trier of fact to understand evidence or determine facts. Experts can be hired by an attorney or by the court itself. When an attorney indicates evidence will be presented by an expert witness, the opposing side has an opportunity to depose the witness in order to discover what the expert is going to say in court. The opposing attorney also has the opportunity to raise a challenge to the admissibility of the expert’s testimony. If the judge decides the expert’s testimony does not meet legal admissibility criteria, the evidence will be excluded. Thus, it is important experts prepare testimony that meets the requirements for legal admissibility. In addition to following legal admissibility rules, experts should follow a number of steps to provide adequate testimony. Thorough preparation is crucial. Experts should meet with the attorney to familiarize themselves with the questions the attorney will ask and to rehearse questions the opposing side is likely to raise. It is important that experts are transparent about the areas of strengths and weaknesses in the evidence they present. Overconfidence can lead to problems for admissibility of expert evidence and to negative perceptions of the expert testimony by triers of fact. The overall demeanor of an expert, such as knowledge, confidence, body language, and dynamic communication affects how triers of fact hear the evidence experts present, and ultimately how triers reach decisions in the case.
Title: Expert Witness Testimony
Description:
Courts often seek testimony and opinions about case facts from expert witnesses.
These witnesses are distinguished from other types of court witnesses by virtue of their knowledge, expertise, and the opportunity to testify to opinions.
Expert witness testimony is guided by legal rules and procedures.
Rules regarding expert testimony focus on ensuring expert testimony is relevant to the case, is based on valid and reliable methods, and will be helpful in aiding the trier of fact to understand evidence or determine facts.
Experts can be hired by an attorney or by the court itself.
When an attorney indicates evidence will be presented by an expert witness, the opposing side has an opportunity to depose the witness in order to discover what the expert is going to say in court.
The opposing attorney also has the opportunity to raise a challenge to the admissibility of the expert’s testimony.
If the judge decides the expert’s testimony does not meet legal admissibility criteria, the evidence will be excluded.
Thus, it is important experts prepare testimony that meets the requirements for legal admissibility.
In addition to following legal admissibility rules, experts should follow a number of steps to provide adequate testimony.
Thorough preparation is crucial.
Experts should meet with the attorney to familiarize themselves with the questions the attorney will ask and to rehearse questions the opposing side is likely to raise.
It is important that experts are transparent about the areas of strengths and weaknesses in the evidence they present.
Overconfidence can lead to problems for admissibility of expert evidence and to negative perceptions of the expert testimony by triers of fact.
The overall demeanor of an expert, such as knowledge, confidence, body language, and dynamic communication affects how triers of fact hear the evidence experts present, and ultimately how triers reach decisions in the case.
Related Results
Addressing Witness Coaching by Cross-Examination
Addressing Witness Coaching by Cross-Examination
In preparing a witness, may a lawyer script the testimony by taking the witness through repeated rehearsals to fabricate a narrative in the form directed by the lawyer and to use w...
Public Scientific Testimony I
Public Scientific Testimony I
Abstract
Chapter 5 concerns scientific expert testimony—i.e., testimony from scientific experts to laypersons. It surveys empirical research on social and psychologi...
TELAAH NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ATAS PERLUASAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU
TELAAH NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ATAS PERLUASAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU
<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mengenai kesesuaian pembuktia...
Brief for John Monahan, David Faigman, Christopher Slobogin, Edward Imwinkelried, Jennifer Mnookin, Roger Park, Paul Rothstein, and 15 other Evidence Professors as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondent (Diaz v. United States, Supreme Court No. 23-14)
Brief for John Monahan, David Faigman, Christopher Slobogin, Edward Imwinkelried, Jennifer Mnookin, Roger Park, Paul Rothstein, and 15 other Evidence Professors as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondent (Diaz v. United States, Supreme Court No. 23-14)
Amici are twenty-two current and emeritus law professors who teach and research Evidence law. Some of us authored the most frequently cited textbooks and treatises. Among us are fo...
MĂRTURIA CA FENOMEN EXISTENŢIAL
MĂRTURIA CA FENOMEN EXISTENŢIAL
In this article, I propose an exploration of the phenomenon of testimony. I argue that the phenomenological approach enables an integrative understanding of testimony, conceived as...
Sobering truths: The influence of victim intoxication status and expert testimony on mock jury decision-making
Sobering truths: The influence of victim intoxication status and expert testimony on mock jury decision-making
Objectives: Victims are often intoxicated with alcohol during crimes and jurors must evaluate their testimony at trial. This study investigated the impact of (1) a victim’s intoxic...
Sobering truths: The influence of victim intoxication status and expert testimony on mock jury decision-making
Sobering truths: The influence of victim intoxication status and expert testimony on mock jury decision-making
Objectives: Victims are often intoxicated with alcohol during crimes and jurors must evaluate their testimony at trial. This study investigated the impact of (1) a victim’s intoxic...
Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony
Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony
Objective: The present research examined whether concurrent expert testimony, or hot tubbing, is able to reduce adversarial allegiance compared to traditional adversarial expert te...

