Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bertrand Game with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concern

View through CrossRef
The classical Bertrand game is assumed that players are perfectly rational. However, many empirical researches indicate that people have bounded rational behavior with fairness concern, which is important in the two‐person game and has attracted much attention. In this paper, fairness concern is incorporated into the Bertrand game with two homogeneous products and the effect of fairness concern on this extended Bertrand game is explored. Nash bargaining solution of player is applied to be his own fairness reference point. Then, a Bertrand game model with fairness concern is established, and its equilibrium price is also derived and analyzed. It is shown from some numerical examples that fairness concern and bargaining power of players have a significant influence on their equilibrium price, expected profits, and utilities. As a player gets more fair‐minded, if the other player has a less focus on fairness, the price competition between them will be intensified and both of them suffer loss. Thus, fairness concern may be advantageous or disadvantageous for players. In most situations, the fairness concern behavior is not beneficial for players. Additionally, the effect of bargaining power is relative to fairness concern. A player who manufactures a low‐cost product should have a weak bargaining power if he terribly focuses on fairness and should have a strong bargaining power if he pays little attention to fairness. However, a player who manufactures a high‐cost product should have a weak bargaining power if he is rarely concerned about fairness. Anyway, the same bargaining power is the best for two players.
Title: Bertrand Game with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concern
Description:
The classical Bertrand game is assumed that players are perfectly rational.
However, many empirical researches indicate that people have bounded rational behavior with fairness concern, which is important in the two‐person game and has attracted much attention.
In this paper, fairness concern is incorporated into the Bertrand game with two homogeneous products and the effect of fairness concern on this extended Bertrand game is explored.
Nash bargaining solution of player is applied to be his own fairness reference point.
Then, a Bertrand game model with fairness concern is established, and its equilibrium price is also derived and analyzed.
It is shown from some numerical examples that fairness concern and bargaining power of players have a significant influence on their equilibrium price, expected profits, and utilities.
As a player gets more fair‐minded, if the other player has a less focus on fairness, the price competition between them will be intensified and both of them suffer loss.
Thus, fairness concern may be advantageous or disadvantageous for players.
In most situations, the fairness concern behavior is not beneficial for players.
Additionally, the effect of bargaining power is relative to fairness concern.
A player who manufactures a low‐cost product should have a weak bargaining power if he terribly focuses on fairness and should have a strong bargaining power if he pays little attention to fairness.
However, a player who manufactures a high‐cost product should have a weak bargaining power if he is rarely concerned about fairness.
Anyway, the same bargaining power is the best for two players.

Related Results

Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
Bargaining solutions in heterogeneous networks: A reinforcement learning‐based approach
Bargaining solutions in heterogeneous networks: A reinforcement learning‐based approach
AbstractTo enhance the performance and the coverage area of the next‐generation heterogeneous wireless networks (HetNets), smaller cells such as femtocells are deployed. A reasonab...
Testing a Behavioral Theory Model of Labor Negotiations
Testing a Behavioral Theory Model of Labor Negotiations
SummaryThe Behavioral Theory we have developed stands up well and helps us gain a better feeling for the behavioral dynamics of collective bargaining. As expected, economic variabl...
Plea Bargaining
Plea Bargaining
Plea bargaining is a process in the criminal justice system through which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a specified criminal charge in exchange for a concession from the pr...
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review
AbstractObjectiveStatistical and artificial intelligence algorithms are increasingly being developed for use in healthcare. These algorithms may reflect biases that magnify dispari...
1038 Outcomes of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in African American Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
1038 Outcomes of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in African American Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
INTRODUCTION: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and is highly prevalent in patients with HIV, ranging from 13% to ...
WITHDRAWN: Economic Burden of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis with Significant Fibrosis in Thailand
WITHDRAWN: Economic Burden of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis with Significant Fibrosis in Thailand
Abstract Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has been recognised as a significant form of chronic liver disease and a common cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellu...
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Solomon’s article and Binmore’s response exemplify a standard exchange between the game theorist and those critical of applying game theory to ethics. The critic of game theory lis...

Back to Top