Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sexual Function after Staged Penile Urethroplasty with Oral Mucosal Graft: A Single-Center Prospective Analysis

View through CrossRef
Objective: The current study aims to assess erectile, ejaculatory and anatomical changes following staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal graft including outcomes re-evaluation after a set period of time in men with complex urethral strictures. Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of 33 men who underwent staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal graft in Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar from July 2023-August 2024. Patients completed their sexual function assessment prior to and after the surgery using the Sexual Health Inventory for men (SHIM) and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Short Form (MSHQ-EjD). Penile curvature, length, and sensitivity were assessed subjectively using a non-validated questionnaire. Changes in scores were analyzed using linear regression and descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient-reported outcomes. Results: The cohort had mean age 45years (SD: 11.2) and BMI 27.6kg/m^2(SD: 4.1). Stricture causes included failed hypospadias repair (52%), lichen sclerosus (27%) and previous urethroplasty (52%). Median follow up after the second stage was 6.3 months (IQR: 3.5–13.3). No clinical significance change was found in SHIM (Δ = −0.64, 95% CI: –3.00–1.72) or MSHQ-EjD score (Δ = 1.55, 95% CI: – 1.53–4.63). Subjectively 23% reported new penile curvature, 55% reported decreased length and 45% reported altered sensitivity. Satisfaction with intercourse increased in 32% (SHAM Q5) while 40% reported decreased bother by ejaculation (MSHQ-EjD Q4). Only 1 patient was on post-operative erectile dysfunction medication. Conclusion: As assessed with validated instruments, staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal grafting OMG has minimal effects on erectile and ejaculatory functions. On the other hand, subjective anatomical changes (sensitivity, curvatures, length) are commonplace and necessitate proper counseling prior to surgery. These insights are relevant to the expectations of patients and offer suggestions for further research on objective measurements of anatomy of the penis. Keywords: urethroplasty, sexual dysfunction, penile curvature, oral mucosal graft, erectile function, ejaculatory function.
Title: Sexual Function after Staged Penile Urethroplasty with Oral Mucosal Graft: A Single-Center Prospective Analysis
Description:
Objective: The current study aims to assess erectile, ejaculatory and anatomical changes following staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal graft including outcomes re-evaluation after a set period of time in men with complex urethral strictures.
Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of 33 men who underwent staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal graft in Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar from July 2023-August 2024.
Patients completed their sexual function assessment prior to and after the surgery using the Sexual Health Inventory for men (SHIM) and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Short Form (MSHQ-EjD).
Penile curvature, length, and sensitivity were assessed subjectively using a non-validated questionnaire.
Changes in scores were analyzed using linear regression and descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient-reported outcomes.
Results: The cohort had mean age 45years (SD: 11.
2) and BMI 27.
6kg/m^2(SD: 4.
1).
Stricture causes included failed hypospadias repair (52%), lichen sclerosus (27%) and previous urethroplasty (52%).
Median follow up after the second stage was 6.
3 months (IQR: 3.
5–13.
3).
No clinical significance change was found in SHIM (Δ = −0.
64, 95% CI: –3.
00–1.
72) or MSHQ-EjD score (Δ = 1.
55, 95% CI: – 1.
53–4.
63).
Subjectively 23% reported new penile curvature, 55% reported decreased length and 45% reported altered sensitivity.
Satisfaction with intercourse increased in 32% (SHAM Q5) while 40% reported decreased bother by ejaculation (MSHQ-EjD Q4).
Only 1 patient was on post-operative erectile dysfunction medication.
Conclusion: As assessed with validated instruments, staged penile urethroplasty with oral mucosal grafting OMG has minimal effects on erectile and ejaculatory functions.
On the other hand, subjective anatomical changes (sensitivity, curvatures, length) are commonplace and necessitate proper counseling prior to surgery.
These insights are relevant to the expectations of patients and offer suggestions for further research on objective measurements of anatomy of the penis.
Keywords: urethroplasty, sexual dysfunction, penile curvature, oral mucosal graft, erectile function, ejaculatory function.

Related Results

Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Attitudes Toward Penile Transplantation Among Urologists and Health Professionals
Attitudes Toward Penile Transplantation Among Urologists and Health Professionals
Abstract Introduction Penile transplantation, in its infancy, has the potential to reestablish functional outcomes for men with ...
Flaccid penile length and stretch factor in the newborn
Flaccid penile length and stretch factor in the newborn
Objective: Little is known about the flaccid penile length in the newborn and the degree of stretch of the penis among investigators while measuring the stretched penile length. Th...
Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
Background: Buccal mucosal graft is commonly used in substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. However, the optimal management of the donor site...
Lingual versus buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: A prospective comparative analysis
Lingual versus buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: A prospective comparative analysis
ObjectiveTo compare lingual and buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture with respect to intraoperative, postoperative parameters and urethroplasty outcome...

Back to Top