Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair.
Design
Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA.
Participants
124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019.
Interventions
Robotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective. Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat.
Results
Patients from both groups were similar at baseline. Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients. No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0
v
0 days; relative rate 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 2.19; P=0.82). For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation. However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141
v
77 min; mean difference 62.89, 45.75 to 80.01; P≤0.001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125)
v
$12 955; cost ratio 1.21, 1.07 to 1.38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.004). Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair. The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair.
Conclusion
This study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov
NCT03490266
.
Title: Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
Description:
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair.
Design
Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA.
Participants
124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019.
Interventions
Robotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery.
Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective.
Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat.
Results
Patients from both groups were similar at baseline.
Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients.
No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0
v
0 days; relative rate 0.
90, 95% confidence interval 0.
37 to 2.
19; P=0.
82).
For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation.
However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141
v
77 min; mean difference 62.
89, 45.
75 to 80.
01; P≤0.
001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125)
v
$12 955; cost ratio 1.
21, 1.
07 to 1.
38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.
004).
Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair.
The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair.
Conclusion
This study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.
gov
NCT03490266
.
Related Results
Outcomes of the eTEP Approach for Incisional Ventral Hernia Repair: Initial Results from Can Tho General Hospital
Outcomes of the eTEP Approach for Incisional Ventral Hernia Repair: Initial Results from Can Tho General Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: The extended-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach has emerged as an innovative technique for incisional ventral hernia repair, offering several adv...
Groin hernia surgery in women : outputs, factors, methods and cost-effectiveness
Groin hernia surgery in women : outputs, factors, methods and cost-effectiveness
<p dir="ltr">There is inequity in access to surgical treatment and quality of care globally and this is more pronounced in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) especially ...
Groin hernia surgery in women : outputs, factors, methods and cost-effectiveness
Groin hernia surgery in women : outputs, factors, methods and cost-effectiveness
<p dir="ltr">There is inequity in access to surgical treatment and quality of care globally and this is more pronounced in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) especially ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study
Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study
AbstractBackgroundThere has been a rapid adoption of robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the USA, despite a lack of proven clinical advantage and higher material ...
Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic VS Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic VS Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
Background: The ventral hernias found along the midline in anterior abdominal wall, known as “primary midline ventral hernias”, are frequent in the general population. These hernia...
Inguinal hernia : optimizing surgical treatment
Inguinal hernia : optimizing surgical treatment
<p dir="ltr">Inguinal hernia is among the most common general surgical conditions, with a lifetime risk of up to 27% in men and 3% in women. Surgical repair remains the only ...
Inguinal hernia : optimizing surgical treatment
Inguinal hernia : optimizing surgical treatment
<p dir="ltr">Inguinal hernia is among the most common general surgical conditions, with a lifetime risk of up to 27% in men and 3% in women. Surgical repair remains the only ...

