Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Negative Colonoscopy After Positive Multitarget Stool DNA: Subsequent Aerodigestive Cancer Diagnosis and Recommendations in the Community Setting

View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is a sensitive stool-based test for colorectal cancer screening. Limited referral-center data suggest low rates of incident aerodigestive cancers after a positive mt-sDNA test and negative colonoscopy; community-based outcomes are unknown. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults referred for colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA in a large community practice (2017–2021). Among patients with negative colonoscopy, we manually recorded postcolonoscopy recommendations, findings if additional colonoscopies had been performed, aerodigestive cancer diagnosis, and last clinical follow-up. Observed cancer incidence was compared with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. RESULTS: Of 1,176 patients completing colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA, 328 (28%) had negative findings. The median cohort age was 67 (interquartile range 59–72) years. Colonoscopy was performed at a median of 53 days after mt-sDNA sample collection. Postcolonoscopy recommendations aligned with Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) guidelines in 59% of patients. Thirty-two patients underwent repeat colonoscopy with a median of 3.5 (1.9–4.4) years later; 2 (6.3%) had advanced serrated lesions, and no colorectal cancer was detected. The median clinical follow-up was 4.4 (3.4–5.6) years. Seven patients developed aerodigestive cancers (2 pancreatic, 5 lung), consistent with expected age- and sex-adjusted Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence (n = 7.62) ( P = 0.823). DISCUSSION: In this community cohort, when a positive mt-sDNA test was followed by negative colonoscopy, rates of subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia and aerodigestive cancer were low. Most patients received recommendations for subsequent colonoscopy that were consistent with MSTF guidelines. Findings further support the current MSTF recommendation of no additional evaluation for extracolonic malignancy in asymptomatic patients after high-quality follow-up colonoscopy.
Title: Negative Colonoscopy After Positive Multitarget Stool DNA: Subsequent Aerodigestive Cancer Diagnosis and Recommendations in the Community Setting
Description:
INTRODUCTION: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is a sensitive stool-based test for colorectal cancer screening.
Limited referral-center data suggest low rates of incident aerodigestive cancers after a positive mt-sDNA test and negative colonoscopy; community-based outcomes are unknown.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults referred for colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA in a large community practice (2017–2021).
Among patients with negative colonoscopy, we manually recorded postcolonoscopy recommendations, findings if additional colonoscopies had been performed, aerodigestive cancer diagnosis, and last clinical follow-up.
Observed cancer incidence was compared with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data.
RESULTS: Of 1,176 patients completing colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA, 328 (28%) had negative findings.
The median cohort age was 67 (interquartile range 59–72) years.
Colonoscopy was performed at a median of 53 days after mt-sDNA sample collection.
Postcolonoscopy recommendations aligned with Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) guidelines in 59% of patients.
Thirty-two patients underwent repeat colonoscopy with a median of 3.
5 (1.
9–4.
4) years later; 2 (6.
3%) had advanced serrated lesions, and no colorectal cancer was detected.
The median clinical follow-up was 4.
4 (3.
4–5.
6) years.
Seven patients developed aerodigestive cancers (2 pancreatic, 5 lung), consistent with expected age- and sex-adjusted Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence (n = 7.
62) ( P = 0.
823).
DISCUSSION: In this community cohort, when a positive mt-sDNA test was followed by negative colonoscopy, rates of subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia and aerodigestive cancer were low.
Most patients received recommendations for subsequent colonoscopy that were consistent with MSTF guidelines.
Findings further support the current MSTF recommendation of no additional evaluation for extracolonic malignancy in asymptomatic patients after high-quality follow-up colonoscopy.

Related Results

287 The Effect of Smoking on Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
287 The Effect of Smoking on Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
INTRODUCTION: There is a known association between smoking and the development of colorectal cancer. Newer screening tools for colorectal cancer including multi...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
288 Multitarget Stool DNA Testing Is for Everyone: Positive Findings in Different Racial Groups
288 Multitarget Stool DNA Testing Is for Everyone: Positive Findings in Different Racial Groups
INTRODUCTION: Different ethnic/racial groups may have unique incidences of colorectal cancer with some groups being at higher risk than others. Our study aims t...
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
Background Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths in England. Most cases of colorectal cancer aris...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy plays an important role in the evaluation of the colon. Many methods for preparing the colon for colonoscopy do not work well. Aim:...
Quantification of Micrornas by Absolute Dpcr for the Diagnostic Screening of Colon Cancer
Quantification of Micrornas by Absolute Dpcr for the Diagnostic Screening of Colon Cancer
There is currently no validated micro(mi)RNA diagnostic stool test to screen for colon cancer (CC) on the market because of the complexity of fecal density, vulnerability of stool ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...

Back to Top