Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency

View through CrossRef
PurposeThis paper aims at assessing the impact of institutional and cultural distances and trade barriers on ASEAN's trade efficiency using a panel data set of 65 countries for the period 2006–2017.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the authors applied an improved version of the stochastic frontier model to estimate the trade efficiency scores. After that, we used the system generalized method of moment (GMM) estimator to investigate the impacts of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency.FindingsThe results show that the trade efficiency of ASEAN countries with the rest of the world (ROW) is moderate, ranging from 0.561 to 0.612, but shows a downward trend. This result indicates that considerable trade potential exists between ASEAN countries and ROW. Institutional and cultural distances, as well as the trade barriers, negatively affect ASEAN's trade efficiency. Efforts to reduce differences in institutions and cultures and to promote trade liberalization are vital remedies for ASEAN countries to turn potentials into actual trade performance.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the existing literature in three different ways. First, this is the first study on the impact of the differences between internal and external characteristics on trade efficiency, specifically, the impact of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency. Second, to obtain accurate efficiency scores, the authors use an improved version of the stochastic frontier model proposed by Karakaplan (2018), which can control the problem of endogeneity. Third, in quantifying the determinants of trade efficiency, the authors apply a system GMM estimator, which allows us to overcome the problems of endogeneity, measurement errors, and omitted variables.
Title: Impact of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency
Description:
PurposeThis paper aims at assessing the impact of institutional and cultural distances and trade barriers on ASEAN's trade efficiency using a panel data set of 65 countries for the period 2006–2017.
Design/methodology/approachFirst, the authors applied an improved version of the stochastic frontier model to estimate the trade efficiency scores.
After that, we used the system generalized method of moment (GMM) estimator to investigate the impacts of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency.
FindingsThe results show that the trade efficiency of ASEAN countries with the rest of the world (ROW) is moderate, ranging from 0.
561 to 0.
612, but shows a downward trend.
This result indicates that considerable trade potential exists between ASEAN countries and ROW.
Institutional and cultural distances, as well as the trade barriers, negatively affect ASEAN's trade efficiency.
Efforts to reduce differences in institutions and cultures and to promote trade liberalization are vital remedies for ASEAN countries to turn potentials into actual trade performance.
Originality/valueThis study contributes to the existing literature in three different ways.
First, this is the first study on the impact of the differences between internal and external characteristics on trade efficiency, specifically, the impact of institutional and cultural distances on ASEAN's trade efficiency.
Second, to obtain accurate efficiency scores, the authors use an improved version of the stochastic frontier model proposed by Karakaplan (2018), which can control the problem of endogeneity.
Third, in quantifying the determinants of trade efficiency, the authors apply a system GMM estimator, which allows us to overcome the problems of endogeneity, measurement errors, and omitted variables.

Related Results

ASEAN WAY DALAM PERPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
ASEAN WAY DALAM PERPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>ASEAN is not free from conflict among its members. For the example is...
Competition among China and ASEAN-5 in the US Market: A New Extension to Shift-Share Analysis
Competition among China and ASEAN-5 in the US Market: A New Extension to Shift-Share Analysis
The United States has a robust trade and investment relationship with China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). ASEAN is collectively the fourth-largest trading...
Russia-ASEAN Summit 2016: Improvement For The Better Strategic Partnership
Russia-ASEAN Summit 2016: Improvement For The Better Strategic Partnership
<p align="center"><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>This article tries to elaborate the impact for the cooperation between ASEAN-Russia in economic and ...
China-ASEAN Economic Ties: Balancing Growth amid Middle-Income Challenges and Opportunities
China-ASEAN Economic Ties: Balancing Growth amid Middle-Income Challenges and Opportunities
The introduction of a free trade area between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China (ACFTA) in 2012 brought China to a leading economic position in Southeast...
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Purpose. As a European granary, Ukraine has rich agricultural resources. China is a country with a large population and has a large demand for food. However, the agricultural trade...
ASEAN di Tengah Rivalitas AS dan Cina: Kerja sama ASEAN dengan RCEP dalam Mengurangi Dampak Perang Dagang
ASEAN di Tengah Rivalitas AS dan Cina: Kerja sama ASEAN dengan RCEP dalam Mengurangi Dampak Perang Dagang
Rivalry among the US and Cina about trade war gives enormous effects towards many states around the world, including ASEAN. ASEAN region is the central market on Pacific. Because o...
The Impact Of ASEAN Free Trade Area On Intra-Asean Manufacturing Trade
The Impact Of ASEAN Free Trade Area On Intra-Asean Manufacturing Trade
This study investigates the effects of ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) agreement on the bilateral manufacturing trade between the 10 member countries of ASEAN and 39 of their trading ...
ASEAN AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (R2P) : A CASE STUDY OF CYCLONE NARGIS IN MYANMAR
ASEAN AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (R2P) : A CASE STUDY OF CYCLONE NARGIS IN MYANMAR
The Responsibility to Protect, commonly abbreviated as R2P or RtoP, was first mentioned in the report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICSS) i...

Back to Top