Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Factors affecting the use of forage index insurance
View through CrossRef
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine factors affecting the use of forage index insurance. Forage is a difficult crop to insure, and index insurance may be well suited for forage insurance and has been implemented in several countries, including Canada, the USA and France. Despite being a promising risk management tool, forage index insurance participation rates in Canada, and other countries are low relative to crop insurance participation rates for grain and oilseed producers.
Design/methodology/approach
A survey was conducted with 87 beef and cattle producers from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. A probit regression model was used, and a number of variables were included to examine the use of forage index insurance.
Findings
In total, 6 of 11 variables in the model are found to be statistically significant in explaining forage producers’ use of forage index insurance. Results suggest that producers who maintain lower feed reserves are more likely to purchase forage index insurance. Also, producers with higher levels of knowledge of crop insurance and a more positive attitude toward forage insurance are more likely to use forage index insurance. Furthermore, producers are more likely to use forage index insurance if they perceive drought and weather risk as being of greater importance, and if they are younger. The importance of the variable forage index insurance premium price was statistically insignificant. This could be due to the effect of subsidization, reducing the importance of price for the decision to purchase. Similarly, the use of other subsidized risk management policies, including a whole-farm margin policy (e.g. the government program and AgriStability), did not reduce forage index insurance use. A possible explanation for this is that the subsidization of the policies may make it profitable to purchase both, despite the overlapping coverage.
Practical implications
These results may be useful for policy makers interested in increasing forage index insurance participation rates, as forage index insurance participation rates have historically been low relative to grain and oilseed producers.
Originality/value
This study is believed to be one of the first studies regarding the use of forage index insurance by forage producers. Producers can be exposed to catastrophic risks such as drought or other extreme weather events, and forage index insurance may be an effective means to manage these risks. Index insurance determines payments using an index that is correlated to producers’ actual yields. A downside of this method is basis risk, which is the mismatch between the insured index and the producer’s actual yield. Research has focused on basis risk and developing improved methods to reduce basis risk. However, less research has investigated the other important factors that may contribute to forage index insurance use. Producers may have a different risk management environment regarding forage production compared to other farm activities, and these differences have largely not been examined.
Title: Factors affecting the use of forage index insurance
Description:
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine factors affecting the use of forage index insurance.
Forage is a difficult crop to insure, and index insurance may be well suited for forage insurance and has been implemented in several countries, including Canada, the USA and France.
Despite being a promising risk management tool, forage index insurance participation rates in Canada, and other countries are low relative to crop insurance participation rates for grain and oilseed producers.
Design/methodology/approach
A survey was conducted with 87 beef and cattle producers from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada.
A probit regression model was used, and a number of variables were included to examine the use of forage index insurance.
Findings
In total, 6 of 11 variables in the model are found to be statistically significant in explaining forage producers’ use of forage index insurance.
Results suggest that producers who maintain lower feed reserves are more likely to purchase forage index insurance.
Also, producers with higher levels of knowledge of crop insurance and a more positive attitude toward forage insurance are more likely to use forage index insurance.
Furthermore, producers are more likely to use forage index insurance if they perceive drought and weather risk as being of greater importance, and if they are younger.
The importance of the variable forage index insurance premium price was statistically insignificant.
This could be due to the effect of subsidization, reducing the importance of price for the decision to purchase.
Similarly, the use of other subsidized risk management policies, including a whole-farm margin policy (e.
g.
the government program and AgriStability), did not reduce forage index insurance use.
A possible explanation for this is that the subsidization of the policies may make it profitable to purchase both, despite the overlapping coverage.
Practical implications
These results may be useful for policy makers interested in increasing forage index insurance participation rates, as forage index insurance participation rates have historically been low relative to grain and oilseed producers.
Originality/value
This study is believed to be one of the first studies regarding the use of forage index insurance by forage producers.
Producers can be exposed to catastrophic risks such as drought or other extreme weather events, and forage index insurance may be an effective means to manage these risks.
Index insurance determines payments using an index that is correlated to producers’ actual yields.
A downside of this method is basis risk, which is the mismatch between the insured index and the producer’s actual yield.
Research has focused on basis risk and developing improved methods to reduce basis risk.
However, less research has investigated the other important factors that may contribute to forage index insurance use.
Producers may have a different risk management environment regarding forage production compared to other farm activities, and these differences have largely not been examined.
Related Results
A Study on new Insurance Distribution Channel’s Right to Receive the Duty of Disclosure and Legal Issues: Focusing on AI (Artificial Intelligence) Insurance Solicitors and Insurance Companies Specializing in Insurance Product Sales
A Study on new Insurance Distribution Channel’s Right to Receive the Duty of Disclosure and Legal Issues: Focusing on AI (Artificial Intelligence) Insurance Solicitors and Insurance Companies Specializing in Insurance Product Sales
The insurance industry has undergone many changes due to the era of the 4th industrial revolution, which interconnects our digital and real worlds. Advances in big data have cleare...
Commercial Agents and Insurance Agents under the Korean Commercial Act
Commercial Agents and Insurance Agents under the Korean Commercial Act
This article considers the legal concepts, powers and duties of agents under the Commercial Act (Part 2) and insurance agents under the Commercial Act (Part 4), and considers to wh...
Functional roles of the insurance broker in the agricultural insurance market
Functional roles of the insurance broker in the agricultural insurance market
In modern conditions, the agricultural sector is one of the most risky branches of economy. Every year, farmers face significant losses due to various natural disasters, diseases a...
Insurance Products in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing Banking
Insurance Products in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing Banking
Purpose: This paper aims to explain new insurance products and policies in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS) Banking. Rastin Banking is a full Islamic Banking System with all ne...
Potential of Spring Barley, Oat and Triticale Intercrops with Field Peas for Forage Production, Nutrition Quality and Beef Cattle Diet
Potential of Spring Barley, Oat and Triticale Intercrops with Field Peas for Forage Production, Nutrition Quality and Beef Cattle Diet
Spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) monocrops and their intercrops with two forage varieties (40-10 and Tucker) and o...
MODERN CAR INSURANCE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE
MODERN CAR INSURANCE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE
The article structures the car insurance system in Ukraine under the influence of legislative changes in 2024. In particular, the category of the automobile insurance system is...
Risk management in crop farming
Risk management in crop farming
The agricultural sector is heavily exposed to the impact of climate change and the more common extreme weather events. This exposure can have significant impacts on agricultural pr...
Productivity and economic feasibility of cultivated forage and food crops in the central highlands of Ethiopia
Productivity and economic feasibility of cultivated forage and food crops in the central highlands of Ethiopia
The study was conducted to evaluate the yield performance of improved forage and food crops and to estimate the profitability of fodder and food crops in Holetta and Ejere areas, c...

