Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Early Breast Cancer Patients who Underwent Mastectomy and Patients Treated by Breast Conserving Therapy: A Meta Analysis

View through CrossRef
Background: Early stage of breast cancer requires mastectomy or breast conserving therapy. However, there are disagreements regarding the outcome of these two types of therapies in term of overall survivals. Objectives: The first aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall survival between patients who underwent mastectomy and those treated by breast conserving therapy. The second was to evaluate the influence of the follow up period on overall survival between the patients who benefited mastectomy and those who under went breast conservative therapy. Methods: We systematically searched on PubMed and Cochrane library all published randomized trials comparing mastectomy with breast conserving therapy and assessing overall survival. Results: Using dichotomous data, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT(OR:0.99; 95% CI:0.93-1.06; P:0.86). This was the same in subgroup analysis based on period of follow up. Their ORs and CI were (OR:0.97; 95% CI:0.81-1.18; P:0.79), (OR:1.01; 95% CI:0.90-1.13; P:0.87) and (OR:1.04; 95% CI:0.93-1.16; P:0.46) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Using generic inverse variance, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT, (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.98-1.04; P:0.71). In subgroup analysis based on period of follow up, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT. Their HRs, CI and P-value were (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.951-1.07; P:0.79), (HR:0.98; 95% CI:0.92-1.04; P:0.51) and (HR:1.02; 95% CI:0.97-1.07; P:0.40) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between patients with early stage breast cancer when they are treated by mastectomy or breast consevative therapy in term of overall survival. Additionnally, the follow up period had no any influence on the both types of surgery in term of overall survival. Therefore, we suggest that breast conservative therapy or mastectomy should be discussed between the care team and the patient, taking into account the financial means available to the patient, especially in low-income countries, the benefits of the surgery and the patient’s choices.
Title: Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Early Breast Cancer Patients who Underwent Mastectomy and Patients Treated by Breast Conserving Therapy: A Meta Analysis
Description:
Background: Early stage of breast cancer requires mastectomy or breast conserving therapy.
However, there are disagreements regarding the outcome of these two types of therapies in term of overall survivals.
Objectives: The first aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall survival between patients who underwent mastectomy and those treated by breast conserving therapy.
The second was to evaluate the influence of the follow up period on overall survival between the patients who benefited mastectomy and those who under went breast conservative therapy.
Methods: We systematically searched on PubMed and Cochrane library all published randomized trials comparing mastectomy with breast conserving therapy and assessing overall survival.
Results: Using dichotomous data, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT(OR:0.
99; 95% CI:0.
93-1.
06; P:0.
86).
This was the same in subgroup analysis based on period of follow up.
Their ORs and CI were (OR:0.
97; 95% CI:0.
81-1.
18; P:0.
79), (OR:1.
01; 95% CI:0.
90-1.
13; P:0.
87) and (OR:1.
04; 95% CI:0.
93-1.
16; P:0.
46) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up.
Using generic inverse variance, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT, (HR:1.
01; 95% CI:0.
98-1.
04; P:0.
71).
In subgroup analysis based on period of follow up, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT.
Their HRs, CI and P-value were (HR:1.
01; 95% CI:0.
951-1.
07; P:0.
79), (HR:0.
98; 95% CI:0.
92-1.
04; P:0.
51) and (HR:1.
02; 95% CI:0.
97-1.
07; P:0.
40) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between patients with early stage breast cancer when they are treated by mastectomy or breast consevative therapy in term of overall survival.
Additionnally, the follow up period had no any influence on the both types of surgery in term of overall survival.
Therefore, we suggest that breast conservative therapy or mastectomy should be discussed between the care team and the patient, taking into account the financial means available to the patient, especially in low-income countries, the benefits of the surgery and the patient’s choices.

Related Results

Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Initial experience with breast conserving surgery in Jos
Initial experience with breast conserving surgery in Jos
Background: Breast conserving surgery is the treatment of choice in the surgical management of early-stage breast cancer in developed countries, while mastectomy has remained the m...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...

Back to Top