Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Great Psychologist: K.D. Ushinsky as a Methodologist of Psychology

View through CrossRef
The article is dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the Great Russian teacher and psychologist K.D. Ushinsky, whose contribution to the development of pedagogy and psychology is undeniable. However, the psychological component of the creativity and legacy of the great scientist and innovator remains largely underestimated: in modern Russian textbooks on the history of psychology, K.D. Ushinsky's psychological research is not given any significant attention, also in foreign ones Ushinsky's psychological works are not mentioned at all. The article states that one of the main achievements of the scientist is the methodology of substantiation of scientific psychology. Even though Ushinsky was not a psychologist, did not position himself as a psychologist, he developed the scientific foundations of psychology to build scientific pedagogy. Psychology as a science simply did not exist at that time, so the development of a system of psychology was a means of solving its main task. Russian pedagogue's solution to Ushinsky's problem, however, represented a unique achievement of world psychological science, and the solution of the Russian pedagogue was original, since the project was focused on the development of practical psychology for teachers. The article provides an analysis of reasons for such underestimation of Ushinsky’s project by scientific community — objective (traditions of considering psychology and public expectations) and subjective (Ushinsky positioning himself exclusively as a teacher and belittling his contribution to psychology). It is mentioned that B.G. Ananyev (1945), who called the Russian scientist a “great psychologist, but the assessment of the classic of Soviet psychology has not become generally accepted, noticed Ushinsky’s contribution to the creation of the original system of psychology. The article analyzes the reasons for the lack of resonance of the publication, among which the main ones are ideological and socio-cultural, related to the uncertain status of psychology itself in the early 1950s, after the session of the two academies, when the proximity to the physiological teaching of I.P. Pavlov and the materialism of the concept became the determining factor. The article gives an outline of K.D. Ushinsky's methodological concept, which allows asserting that Ushinsky proposed a project of scientific psychology, the first practice-oriented project of psychological science in the history of world psychology.
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Title: The Great Psychologist: K.D. Ushinsky as a Methodologist of Psychology
Description:
The article is dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the Great Russian teacher and psychologist K.
D.
Ushinsky, whose contribution to the development of pedagogy and psychology is undeniable.
However, the psychological component of the creativity and legacy of the great scientist and innovator remains largely underestimated: in modern Russian textbooks on the history of psychology, K.
D.
Ushinsky's psychological research is not given any significant attention, also in foreign ones Ushinsky's psychological works are not mentioned at all.
The article states that one of the main achievements of the scientist is the methodology of substantiation of scientific psychology.
Even though Ushinsky was not a psychologist, did not position himself as a psychologist, he developed the scientific foundations of psychology to build scientific pedagogy.
Psychology as a science simply did not exist at that time, so the development of a system of psychology was a means of solving its main task.
Russian pedagogue's solution to Ushinsky's problem, however, represented a unique achievement of world psychological science, and the solution of the Russian pedagogue was original, since the project was focused on the development of practical psychology for teachers.
The article provides an analysis of reasons for such underestimation of Ushinsky’s project by scientific community — objective (traditions of considering psychology and public expectations) and subjective (Ushinsky positioning himself exclusively as a teacher and belittling his contribution to psychology).
It is mentioned that B.
G.
Ananyev (1945), who called the Russian scientist a “great psychologist, but the assessment of the classic of Soviet psychology has not become generally accepted, noticed Ushinsky’s contribution to the creation of the original system of psychology.
The article analyzes the reasons for the lack of resonance of the publication, among which the main ones are ideological and socio-cultural, related to the uncertain status of psychology itself in the early 1950s, after the session of the two academies, when the proximity to the physiological teaching of I.
P.
Pavlov and the materialism of the concept became the determining factor.
The article gives an outline of K.
D.
Ushinsky's methodological concept, which allows asserting that Ushinsky proposed a project of scientific psychology, the first practice-oriented project of psychological science in the history of world psychology.

Related Results

The Theological and Anthropological Ideas of Konstantin Ushinsky and the Socio-Humanistic Core of the New Model of Russian Education
The Theological and Anthropological Ideas of Konstantin Ushinsky and the Socio-Humanistic Core of the New Model of Russian Education
The authors of this article examine the conceptual and methodological legacy of Konstantin Dmitrievich Ushinsky and its significance for shaping the socio-humanistic foundations of...
Comparison of Role Expectations of the School Psychologist
Comparison of Role Expectations of the School Psychologist
This study was designed to determine whether there were differences in the role expectations of the school psychologist among state supervisors of school psychology, teachers, admi...
HISTORY ОF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY: OVERVIEW
HISTORY ОF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY: OVERVIEW
Background. Th is material will be very useful for Russian scientists, as it will allow them to evaluate the achievements of Chinese psychology. Th e authors of the article believe...
PAPEL E PRÁTICAS DO PSICÓLOGO ESCOLAR: UMA REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA
PAPEL E PRÁTICAS DO PSICÓLOGO ESCOLAR: UMA REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA
The study aimed to map the national scientific production about the role and practices of the school psychologist. To this end, an integrative review of the literature that address...
History of the History of Psychology
History of the History of Psychology
Reflexivity has been a common theme in the literature on the history of psychology in recent years. Reflecting on the history of psychology is for historians of psychology the ulti...
Preventive competence of an educational psychologist: the connection with diagnostics and art methods
Preventive competence of an educational psychologist: the connection with diagnostics and art methods
        Maintaining the mental health of students is an important task of the education system and the work of a psychologist at school and university. In 2022, the UNESCO Internat...
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Research on false memory formation using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm has been extensively conducted in Western contexts. Yet, a significant gap remains in experimen...
Psychologist-Sport Psychologist Liaison Between Counseling and Psychological Services and Intercollegiate Athletics
Psychologist-Sport Psychologist Liaison Between Counseling and Psychological Services and Intercollegiate Athletics
Acting as a liaison between a university’s counseling and psychological services and intercollegiate athletics department is an emerging alternative career path in professional psy...

Back to Top