Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Application of Midazolam Oral Solution Combined with Dexmedetomidine Nasal Drops in Procedural Sedation for Paediatric Pulmonary Function Testing:a randomised trial
View through CrossRef
Objective
: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a midazolam
oral solution used in combination with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in
procedural sedation for paediatric pulmonary function testing.
Methods
: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
was conducted to assign paediatric patients (aged 6 months to 6 years)
undergoing pulmonary function testing under procedural sedation to two
groups: one group (M-D group) received 0.25 mg/kg midazolam via oral
solution plus 0.2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine nasal drops (n=60), and the
other group (C-D group) received 30 mg/kg chloral hydrate via oral
solution plus 0.2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine nasal drops (n=60). The modified
Ramsay sedation scale was used to assess the depth of sedation. The
primary outcomes included the first-time sedation success rate, onset
time, sedation duration, recovery time, and incidence of adverse events
such as bradycardia, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and
medication acceptance.
Results
: There was no significant
difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The
first-time sedation success rates did not significantly differ between
the M-D and C-D groups (93.3% vs. 96.7%, P=0.679). The onset time of
the M-D group was longer than that of the C-D group (25.97 min vs. 19.43
min, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in sedation
duration (35.95 min vs. 39.93 min, P=0.129) or recovery time (18.34 min
vs. 22.51 min, P=0.122) between the two groups. Moreover, the incidence
of adverse events did not significantly differ (11.7% vs. 20.0%,
P=0.21). All the children completed the test on the same day. Medication
acceptance was significantly greater in the M-D group than in the C-D
group (P=0.00).
Conclusion:
The combination of midazolam oral
solution and dexmedetomidine nasal drops is an effective and safe
sedation regimen for paediatric pulmonary function testing that improves
medication acceptance and parental satisfaction. This study provides
robust support for the smooth performance of paediatric pulmonary
function testing and merits clinical promotion and application.
Title: Application of Midazolam Oral Solution Combined with Dexmedetomidine Nasal Drops in Procedural Sedation for Paediatric Pulmonary Function Testing:a randomised trial
Description:
Objective
: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a midazolam
oral solution used in combination with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in
procedural sedation for paediatric pulmonary function testing.
Methods
: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
was conducted to assign paediatric patients (aged 6 months to 6 years)
undergoing pulmonary function testing under procedural sedation to two
groups: one group (M-D group) received 0.
25 mg/kg midazolam via oral
solution plus 0.
2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine nasal drops (n=60), and the
other group (C-D group) received 30 mg/kg chloral hydrate via oral
solution plus 0.
2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine nasal drops (n=60).
The modified
Ramsay sedation scale was used to assess the depth of sedation.
The
primary outcomes included the first-time sedation success rate, onset
time, sedation duration, recovery time, and incidence of adverse events
such as bradycardia, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and
medication acceptance.
Results
: There was no significant
difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups.
The
first-time sedation success rates did not significantly differ between
the M-D and C-D groups (93.
3% vs.
96.
7%, P=0.
679).
The onset time of
the M-D group was longer than that of the C-D group (25.
97 min vs.
19.
43
min, P=0.
000).
There were no significant differences in sedation
duration (35.
95 min vs.
39.
93 min, P=0.
129) or recovery time (18.
34 min
vs.
22.
51 min, P=0.
122) between the two groups.
Moreover, the incidence
of adverse events did not significantly differ (11.
7% vs.
20.
0%,
P=0.
21).
All the children completed the test on the same day.
Medication
acceptance was significantly greater in the M-D group than in the C-D
group (P=0.
00).
Conclusion:
The combination of midazolam oral
solution and dexmedetomidine nasal drops is an effective and safe
sedation regimen for paediatric pulmonary function testing that improves
medication acceptance and parental satisfaction.
This study provides
robust support for the smooth performance of paediatric pulmonary
function testing and merits clinical promotion and application.
Related Results
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Abstract
Background
Midazolam is used for sedation before diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures by several routes including oral, intravenou...
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
Introduction
Conscious sedation is frequently employed for the management of pre-cooperative or extremely anxious and painful procedures in emergency department...
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidences of postanesthetic restlessness and hemodynamic fluctuations in children within acceptable ranges. Dexmedetomid...
Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway - A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial
Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway - A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Both dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine are known for their minimal respiratory depressant effects. While many ...
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam as a Premedication Before Surgery
Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam as a Premedication Before Surgery
Getting comfort and solace is an increasingly important idea in 21st century. The getting of progressing development and capacities directly deals with an unrivaled choice for pedi...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
Introduction
The field of Neurointervention has attracted some of the very best physicians across the world. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this specialty,...

