Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy and Safety of Neostigmine Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View through CrossRef
Background: Neostigmine has been found to improve survival in animal models of sepsis. However, its feasibility, efficacy, and safety in patients with sepsis or septic shock have not been investigated.Aim: This parallel randomized controlled double-blinded design aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of neostigmine as an adjunctive therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock.Patients and Methods: A total of 167 adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were assessed for eligibility; 50 patients were randomized to receive a continuous infusion of neostigmine (0.2 mg/h for 120 h; neostigmine arm) or 0.9% saline (control arm) in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores 120 h after therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included mortality rates and changes in procalcitonin level.Results: The median (interquartile range) change in SOFA scores improved significantly in the neostigmine arm [−2 (−5, 1)] as compared with the control arm [1.5 (0, 2.8); p = 0.007]. Progression from sepsis to septic shock was more frequent in the control arm (p = 0.01). The incidence of shock reversal in patients with septic shock was significantly lower in the control arm than in the neostigmine arm (p = 0.04). Differences in 28-days mortality rates did not reach statistical significance between the control and neostigmine arms (p = 0.36). Percentage change in procalcitonin levels was similar in both arms (p = 0.74).Conclusion: Neostigmine adjunctive therapy may be safe and effective when administered in patients with sepsis or septic shock.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04130230.
Title: Efficacy and Safety of Neostigmine Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Description:
Background: Neostigmine has been found to improve survival in animal models of sepsis.
However, its feasibility, efficacy, and safety in patients with sepsis or septic shock have not been investigated.
Aim: This parallel randomized controlled double-blinded design aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of neostigmine as an adjunctive therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock.
Patients and Methods: A total of 167 adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were assessed for eligibility; 50 patients were randomized to receive a continuous infusion of neostigmine (0.
2 mg/h for 120 h; neostigmine arm) or 0.
9% saline (control arm) in addition to standard therapy.
The primary outcome was the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores 120 h after therapy initiation.
Secondary outcomes included mortality rates and changes in procalcitonin level.
Results: The median (interquartile range) change in SOFA scores improved significantly in the neostigmine arm [−2 (−5, 1)] as compared with the control arm [1.
5 (0, 2.
8); p = 0.
007].
Progression from sepsis to septic shock was more frequent in the control arm (p = 0.
01).
The incidence of shock reversal in patients with septic shock was significantly lower in the control arm than in the neostigmine arm (p = 0.
04).
Differences in 28-days mortality rates did not reach statistical significance between the control and neostigmine arms (p = 0.
36).
Percentage change in procalcitonin levels was similar in both arms (p = 0.
74).
Conclusion: Neostigmine adjunctive therapy may be safe and effective when administered in patients with sepsis or septic shock.
Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04130230.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Prevalence of Sepsis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Organism-Specific Analysis
Prevalence of Sepsis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Organism-Specific Analysis
Introduction: Patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplants are at a high risk of infection. With the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDR),...
A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 
A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy 
Background Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals. Initial clinical trials w...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Neurological Complications in Sepsis
Neurological Complications in Sepsis
Background: Sepsis is a medical emergency that requires immediate assessment and management. Sepsis can affect patients at any age group which increases the number of sepsis cases....

Back to Top