Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The notion of constitutional justice in federal systems
View through CrossRef
The history of the notion of justice dates back to ancient civilizations, but the concept of constitutional justice in the modern era holds great importance, because the written constitution is considered the foundation for determining the availability of rights. Therefore, constitutional legislators strive for completeness in making the constitution an instrument for providing this concept. The importance of this research lies in revealing the concept of constitutional justice, as well as its important position in the federal system, because constitutional justice is related to a distant and broad objective. For this purpose, we have relied on the analytical method to analyze the thoughts and opinions of constitutional jurisprudence and constitutional texts, with the aim of determining the concept of constitutional justice and its position in emergence within the federal system, whereby the constitution embodies that higher objective of justice within itself and demonstrates that it is more general and broader than the objective of justice in ordinary laws. It also shows that the constitutional legislator is the foremost designer of justice within the constitution, and that the constitutional court is not the sole implementer of constitutional justice. Thus, constitutional justice is not merely an institution, but rather a process for welfare in society, particularly in the role it plays in federal systems.
Title: The notion of constitutional justice in federal systems
Description:
The history of the notion of justice dates back to ancient civilizations, but the concept of constitutional justice in the modern era holds great importance, because the written constitution is considered the foundation for determining the availability of rights.
Therefore, constitutional legislators strive for completeness in making the constitution an instrument for providing this concept.
The importance of this research lies in revealing the concept of constitutional justice, as well as its important position in the federal system, because constitutional justice is related to a distant and broad objective.
For this purpose, we have relied on the analytical method to analyze the thoughts and opinions of constitutional jurisprudence and constitutional texts, with the aim of determining the concept of constitutional justice and its position in emergence within the federal system, whereby the constitution embodies that higher objective of justice within itself and demonstrates that it is more general and broader than the objective of justice in ordinary laws.
It also shows that the constitutional legislator is the foremost designer of justice within the constitution, and that the constitutional court is not the sole implementer of constitutional justice.
Thus, constitutional justice is not merely an institution, but rather a process for welfare in society, particularly in the role it plays in federal systems.
Related Results
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus
Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus
The article examines the stages of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus, through the prism of the development of abstract and concrete control. Charac...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
Crisis of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and its Constitutional Implication
Crisis of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and its Constitutional Implication
This article analyzes the causes and the progress of the crisis in the Polish constitutional court/tribunal since 2015 and reflects on the constitutional implications of the Polish...
Justice paysanne
Justice paysanne
En anthropologie juridique, le terme « justice paysanne » renvoie à l’une des expressions du pluralisme juridique, entendu comme l’existence d’une pluralité d’ordres normatifs, de ...
Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory
Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory
Judge Richard Posner's well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III has lambasted constitutional theory for the way in which its "cosm...
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law N...

