Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Morphosyntax–phonology mismatches in Muskogee

View through CrossRef
The mismatching of morphosyntactic and phonological domains inside words provides a testing ground for models of the morphosyntax–phonology interface. This paper describes a pattern of morphosyntax–phonology mismatches in Muskogee. Muskogee verbs are spelled out at two phases, vP and CP, resulting in two phonological domains, which this paper models as ω-recursion. The vP phase and ωmin are mismatched: either vP-phase material is parsed outside ωmin – an undermatch – or CP-phase material is parsed inside ωmin – an overmatch. The mismatch pattern requires a parallel model of morphosyntax–phonology mapping to distinguish mismatches using gradient Align constraints, rather than categorial Match constraints. Additionally, a phase-based model must allow earlier cycles to be altered in later cycles, ruling out strict phase inalterability in phonology, while a Stratal OT analysis must send a word's first phase through the stem-level phonology, regardless of its ultimate phasal structure.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Morphosyntax–phonology mismatches in Muskogee
Description:
The mismatching of morphosyntactic and phonological domains inside words provides a testing ground for models of the morphosyntax–phonology interface.
This paper describes a pattern of morphosyntax–phonology mismatches in Muskogee.
Muskogee verbs are spelled out at two phases, vP and CP, resulting in two phonological domains, which this paper models as ω-recursion.
The vP phase and ωmin are mismatched: either vP-phase material is parsed outside ωmin – an undermatch – or CP-phase material is parsed inside ωmin – an overmatch.
The mismatch pattern requires a parallel model of morphosyntax–phonology mapping to distinguish mismatches using gradient Align constraints, rather than categorial Match constraints.
Additionally, a phase-based model must allow earlier cycles to be altered in later cycles, ruling out strict phase inalterability in phonology, while a Stratal OT analysis must send a word's first phase through the stem-level phonology, regardless of its ultimate phasal structure.

Related Results

On-Going Morphosyntax Supplementary Material
On-Going Morphosyntax Supplementary Material
Studying morphosyntax is important in the study of linguistics and the topic of morphosyntax is very often considered as difficult to learn. However, several problems still occur i...
Juncture and Boundary
Juncture and Boundary
This article is about the question of how morpho-syntactic information impacts phonology. Its broad subject matter is thus the morpho-syntax-phonology interface. Note that inquiry ...
Qualitative Mismatches
Qualitative Mismatches
Qualitative mismatches arise when the qualifications or skills of workers, individually or in the aggregate, are different from the qualifications or skills required or specified f...
Non-derivational Phonology Meets Lexical Phonology
Non-derivational Phonology Meets Lexical Phonology
Abstract A proper theory of phonology has to provide at least the three subtheories listed in (1): (1) (i) a theory of the nature of phonological repr...
Principles of Dependency Phonology
Principles of Dependency Phonology
John Anderson and Colin Ewen, two of the most notable exponents of 'dependency phonology', present in this book a detailed account of this integrated model for the representational...
Dependency Phonology
Dependency Phonology
AbstractThis chapter outlines the development of the theory of phonological representation known as Dependency Phonology. Starting with a brief sketch of how the dependency formali...
Computational Phonology
Computational Phonology
Much like the term “computational linguistics”, the term “computational phonology” has come to mean different things to different people. Research grounded in a variety of methodol...

Back to Top