Javascript must be enabled to continue!
College Competitiveness and Medical School Exam Performance
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: In medical school, students are tested through periodic USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations before obtaining a medical license. Traditional predictors of medical school performance include MCAT scores, undergraduate grades, and undergraduate institutional selectivity. Prior studies indicate that admissions committees might unfairly discriminate against applicants who graduated from less competitive universities. However, there is limited literature to determine whether those who attended competitive colleges perform better on USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations. Objective: The purpose of our study is to determine if students who attended competitive undergraduate colleges outperform those who did not on medical school benchmarks. Methods: We defined a Competitive College as having greater than 10% of its student body scoring 1400 or higher (on a 1600 scale) on the SAT. If this criterion was not met, colleges would be categorized as Non-Competitive. Descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests were calculated to analyze average test scores on the MCAT, Phase 1 NBME, USMLE Step 1, Phase 2 NBME, and USMLE Step 2. Results: Our findings suggest there are no statistically significant differences between students who do or do not attend competitive undergraduate colleges on these medical school benchmark examinations following the MCAT. Additionally, students who do not attend competitive undergraduate colleges may outperform their counterparts on USMLE Step 2. Conclusions: Admissions committees should use this data to aid in their student selection as our research indicates that institutional selectivity accurately predicts MCAT scores, but not performance on standardized medical school examinations once admitted.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: College Competitiveness and Medical School Exam Performance
Description:
Abstract
Background: In medical school, students are tested through periodic USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations before obtaining a medical license.
Traditional predictors of medical school performance include MCAT scores, undergraduate grades, and undergraduate institutional selectivity.
Prior studies indicate that admissions committees might unfairly discriminate against applicants who graduated from less competitive universities.
However, there is limited literature to determine whether those who attended competitive colleges perform better on USMLE Step 1 and 2 examinations.
Objective: The purpose of our study is to determine if students who attended competitive undergraduate colleges outperform those who did not on medical school benchmarks.
Methods: We defined a Competitive College as having greater than 10% of its student body scoring 1400 or higher (on a 1600 scale) on the SAT.
If this criterion was not met, colleges would be categorized as Non-Competitive.
Descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests were calculated to analyze average test scores on the MCAT, Phase 1 NBME, USMLE Step 1, Phase 2 NBME, and USMLE Step 2.
Results: Our findings suggest there are no statistically significant differences between students who do or do not attend competitive undergraduate colleges on these medical school benchmark examinations following the MCAT.
Additionally, students who do not attend competitive undergraduate colleges may outperform their counterparts on USMLE Step 2.
Conclusions: Admissions committees should use this data to aid in their student selection as our research indicates that institutional selectivity accurately predicts MCAT scores, but not performance on standardized medical school examinations once admitted.
Related Results
Trooping the (School) Colour
Trooping the (School) Colour
Introduction
Throughout the early and mid-twentieth century, cadet training was a feature of many secondary schools and educational establishments across Australia, with countless ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
The publication presents the findings of an inquiry conducted among 110 girls aged 15 - 17 who had been directed, on the grounds of being “out of school and out of work”, to two on...
Physiological and biochemical study of the effect of Anxiety exam in the blood of students.
Physiological and biochemical study of the effect of Anxiety exam in the blood of students.
This study was conducted on the students of the Faculty of Education / University of Samarra, Department of biology for the period of (10/ 11/ 2010 to 28/02/2011 ) study were divi...
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
This aim of this project is to apply a series of pattern detection Data Mining algorithms to accurately identify cheating by one or more students during classroom test exams. JMP s...
School Choice in Bangladesh
School Choice in Bangladesh
This report presents findings from a study of School Choice in Bangladesh, conducted in four districts of Bangladesh in 2008. The objective of the study was to analyse household ch...
OSCE: An Effective Tool of Assessment for Medical Students
OSCE: An Effective Tool of Assessment for Medical Students
Background: To assess the competency of a student different tools are used. Since its introduction in 1975 by Dr. Harden and his team, OSCE has gained tremendous strides to assess ...
An Analysis of Orthotics and Prosthetics First-attempt Board Exam Performance Across Exam-taker Demographics
An Analysis of Orthotics and Prosthetics First-attempt Board Exam Performance Across Exam-taker Demographics
Background:
As demographics among the medical field continue to diversify, many professions have conducted studies to determine disparities in board exam perfor...

