Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Simulated Drift of Dicamba and Glyphosate on Coffee Crop
View through CrossRef
Weed management in areas adjacent to coffee plantations makes herbicide drift a constant concern, especially with the use of nonselective products such as dicamba. The objective of this study was to evaluate the phytotoxic effects of the herbicide dicamba alone and mixed with glyphosate as a result of simulated drift in a coffee-producing area. The study was conducted in duplicate at two different coffee cherry development stages. The study was performed with a randomized block design and a 2 × 5 + 1 factorial scheme with four replications using two herbicide spray solutions (dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate) and five low doses (0.25; 1; 5; 10; and 20%). Additionally, a control treatment without herbicide application was also employed. In this study, we evaluated the phytotoxic damage and biometric and productive parameters. Visual damages were observed with the use of dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate doses reduced by 0.25% to 5% in the first days after application. The main symptoms were new leaf epinasty, changes in the internodal distance, and plagiotropic branch curvature. Low doses led to reduced plant height and branch length. The treatments did not reduce productivity and performance but altered the physical classifications of grains.
Title: Simulated Drift of Dicamba and Glyphosate on Coffee Crop
Description:
Weed management in areas adjacent to coffee plantations makes herbicide drift a constant concern, especially with the use of nonselective products such as dicamba.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the phytotoxic effects of the herbicide dicamba alone and mixed with glyphosate as a result of simulated drift in a coffee-producing area.
The study was conducted in duplicate at two different coffee cherry development stages.
The study was performed with a randomized block design and a 2 × 5 + 1 factorial scheme with four replications using two herbicide spray solutions (dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate) and five low doses (0.
25; 1; 5; 10; and 20%).
Additionally, a control treatment without herbicide application was also employed.
In this study, we evaluated the phytotoxic damage and biometric and productive parameters.
Visual damages were observed with the use of dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate doses reduced by 0.
25% to 5% in the first days after application.
The main symptoms were new leaf epinasty, changes in the internodal distance, and plagiotropic branch curvature.
Low doses led to reduced plant height and branch length.
The treatments did not reduce productivity and performance but altered the physical classifications of grains.
Related Results
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 12 1944
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 12 1944
1. The Committee have received a request from the Tea and Coffee Division for advice as to appropriate standards for liquid “coffee essences” including coffee and chicory essences,...
Eficácia de herbicidas aplicados em trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis) na região oeste do Estado do Paraná
Eficácia de herbicidas aplicados em trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis) na região oeste do Estado do Paraná
A trapoeraba (Commelina spp.) é considerada um gênero tolerante ao glyphosate, apresentando controle reduzido a esse herbicida em estádios avançados. Assim, o objetivo do trabalho ...
Physiology of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass and implications for management
Physiology of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass and implications for management
[EMBARGOED UNTIL 12/1/2023] Glyphosate, as the formulated commercial herbicide Roundup�, was introduced by Monsanto in 1974. The broad-spectrum activity of glyphosate made it an ex...
Forage Legume Response to Dicamba and 2,4‐D Applications1
Forage Legume Response to Dicamba and 2,4‐D Applications1
AbstractWeed control options in pastures containing legumes are limited due to herbicide selectivity. A field study was conducted for 2 years in northeast Mississippi on a Leeper f...
Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba-Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field-Scale Investigation
Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba-Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field-Scale Investigation
AbstractResearch was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate...
Stewarding 2,4-D- and dicamba- based weed control technologies in cotton and soybean production systems
Stewarding 2,4-D- and dicamba- based weed control technologies in cotton and soybean production systems
Distinguishing 2,4-D and dicamba herbicide formulations in cotton and soybean tissue is challenging in regulation of crop injury from these herbicides. Additionally, stewardship of...
Horticultural crop response to synthetic auxins
Horticultural crop response to synthetic auxins
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] Rising adoption of dicamba-tolerant soybeans increases the potential exposure of grapes to dicamba, where of...
CONTROLE QUÍMICO DE MILHO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE PROVENIENTE DE DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS
CONTROLE QUÍMICO DE MILHO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE PROVENIENTE DE DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS
RESUMO – As plantas voluntárias de milho podem causar perdas quando em convivência com outras culturas, tornando-se necessário proceder seu controle. Neste sentido, diferentes est...

