Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Relations between the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate in 1481–1485
View through CrossRef
During the second half of the 15th and early 16th centuries, the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate were in a state of confrontation. They fought over territory that could be used for nomadic life, as well as over the Golden Horde legacy. However, there were periods of peaceful relations. One such period was the peaceful lull of 1481–1485. The aim of this study is to examine the reasons for the peace between the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate and the chronology of events from 1481–1485. Research materials include Russian chronicles, the Lithuanian Metrica, and an ambassadorial charter. Results and scientific novelty: It was discovered that the temporary cessation of hostility between the two yurts was caused by the weakening of the Great Horde after the death of Khan Akhmat. This truce was beneficial only for Mengli Giray, who received Timur’s beklarbek and the sons of Akhmat and kept them in Crimea for a long time, which inevitably led to a new Crimean-Horde conflict.
Title: Relations between the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate in 1481–1485
Description:
During the second half of the 15th and early 16th centuries, the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate were in a state of confrontation.
They fought over territory that could be used for nomadic life, as well as over the Golden Horde legacy.
However, there were periods of peaceful relations.
One such period was the peaceful lull of 1481–1485.
The aim of this study is to examine the reasons for the peace between the Great Horde and the Crimean Khanate and the chronology of events from 1481–1485.
Research materials include Russian chronicles, the Lithuanian Metrica, and an ambassadorial charter.
Results and scientific novelty: It was discovered that the temporary cessation of hostility between the two yurts was caused by the weakening of the Great Horde after the death of Khan Akhmat.
This truce was beneficial only for Mengli Giray, who received Timur’s beklarbek and the sons of Akhmat and kept them in Crimea for a long time, which inevitably led to a new Crimean-Horde conflict.
Related Results
The post-Horde world and the union of Ivan III and Mengli-Girey I: An attempt to create a “bipolar” political system
The post-Horde world and the union of Ivan III and Mengli-Girey I: An attempt to create a “bipolar” political system
The purpose of the study: To trace the evolution of interstate relations in Eastern Europe at the beginning of the “long 16th century” as a political system, to characterize its ma...
Crimean Tatar-Danish diplomacy in the documents of the Crimean Khanate
Crimean Tatar-Danish diplomacy in the documents of the Crimean Khanate
The rubric presents original in language and style yarlyks and letters of the Crimean Khanate’s ruling elite, with the translation into Russian, reflecting the Crimean Tatar-Danish...
Crimean Khanate in Ottoman documents (3)
Crimean Khanate in Ottoman documents (3)
In 2013, in Istanbul (Turkey), with the assistance of the General Directorate of State Archives of the Republic of Turkey’s Prime Ministry, the book “Osmanlı belgelerinde Kırım han...
Alan Fisher. The Crimean Tatars
Alan Fisher. The Crimean Tatars
The given article is a translation from English of the well- known scholar, historian Alan Fisher`s work The Crimean Tatars. He was a professor of State University in Michigan, the...
KOKAND KHANATE IN PERIOD OF SHIR ALI KHAN (1842-1845)
KOKAND KHANATE IN PERIOD OF SHIR ALI KHAN (1842-1845)
Established in 1709 under the leadership of the Ming tribe of Uzbeks in the Fergana Valley, the Kokand Khanate reached the peak of its power with Muhammad Ali Khan (1822-1842), who...
Maksud Giray Khan in Light of Pierre Ruffin’s “Crimean Diary” (Bin Selyamet Giray Khan)
Maksud Giray Khan in Light of Pierre Ruffin’s “Crimean Diary” (Bin Selyamet Giray Khan)
The aim of our study is to analyze the state administration of Maksud Giray Khan (1767–1768 / 1771–1772), who ascended to the throne twice during the critical periods of the Crimea...
Features of administration of justice in the Crimean Khanate
Features of administration of justice in the Crimean Khanate
The article analyzes the problems of functioning of judicial system in the Crimean Khanate. The law institute of the Crimean judges was an important component of the Crimean judici...
The Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate in the North Caucasus: A Case Study of Ottoman-Crimean Relations in the Mid-Sixteenth Century
The Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate in the North Caucasus: A Case Study of Ottoman-Crimean Relations in the Mid-Sixteenth Century
Focusing on Ottoman and Crimean policies and their involvement in the North Caucasus in the second half of the sixteenth century as a case study, this paper sheds light on the natu...

