Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

215 Reexamining Nimodipine's Effect on Neurological Outcomes After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION: Nimodipine therapy is a guideline-directed treatment to improve neurological outcomes after ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruptured aSAH trials reporting ‘good’ neurological outcomes, defined as Modified Rankin Scale 0-2 or the study’s own criteria. ‘Pre-nimodipine’ studies included those prior to the use of nimodipine. ‘Nimodipine’ studies gave nimodipine as an investigational drug, leading to its widespread acceptance. ‘Post-nimodipine’ studies gave nimodipine as standard-of-care to controls. 172 studies were screened, 122 were evaluated in full for eligibility, and 52 were included. Rates of ‘good’ outcomes were aggregated and compared with respect to era and nimodipine status. RESULTS: ‘Nimodipine’ era nimodipine recipients had exceptionally high rates of ‘good’ neurological outcome at 81% (95% CI 68-92%). ‘Post-nimodipine’ era nimodipine recipients had a 67% (95% CI 64-70%) rate of ‘good’ neurological outcome. When subcategorized by decade, this was stable at 68% (95% CI 62-73%), 64% (95% CI 58-69%), and 70% (95% CI 64-73%). Those not receiving nimodipine in the ‘pre-nimodipine’ and ‘nimodipine’ eras also had a similar chance of ‘good’ neurological outcome at 60% (95% CI 49-71%) and 69% (95% CI 55-82%) respectively. ‘Nimodipine’ era studies were too heterogeneous to be statistically different, however 5 of the 7 are outside 95% confidence intervals when compared to any other group. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 60-70% of patients in randomized studies of ruptured aSAH have ‘good’ neurologic outcomes regardless of nimodipine status or era of treatment. The studies that examined nimodipine as an intervention, leading to its acceptance as the standard of care, are historical outliers. This raises concerns about nimodipine’s overall efficacy in treating aSAH, and the validity of its recommendation in the ruptured aSAH management guidelines.
Title: 215 Reexamining Nimodipine's Effect on Neurological Outcomes After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
INTRODUCTION: Nimodipine therapy is a guideline-directed treatment to improve neurological outcomes after ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruptured aSAH trials reporting ‘good’ neurological outcomes, defined as Modified Rankin Scale 0-2 or the study’s own criteria.
‘Pre-nimodipine’ studies included those prior to the use of nimodipine.
‘Nimodipine’ studies gave nimodipine as an investigational drug, leading to its widespread acceptance.
‘Post-nimodipine’ studies gave nimodipine as standard-of-care to controls.
172 studies were screened, 122 were evaluated in full for eligibility, and 52 were included.
Rates of ‘good’ outcomes were aggregated and compared with respect to era and nimodipine status.
RESULTS: ‘Nimodipine’ era nimodipine recipients had exceptionally high rates of ‘good’ neurological outcome at 81% (95% CI 68-92%).
‘Post-nimodipine’ era nimodipine recipients had a 67% (95% CI 64-70%) rate of ‘good’ neurological outcome.
When subcategorized by decade, this was stable at 68% (95% CI 62-73%), 64% (95% CI 58-69%), and 70% (95% CI 64-73%).
Those not receiving nimodipine in the ‘pre-nimodipine’ and ‘nimodipine’ eras also had a similar chance of ‘good’ neurological outcome at 60% (95% CI 49-71%) and 69% (95% CI 55-82%) respectively.
‘Nimodipine’ era studies were too heterogeneous to be statistically different, however 5 of the 7 are outside 95% confidence intervals when compared to any other group.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 60-70% of patients in randomized studies of ruptured aSAH have ‘good’ neurologic outcomes regardless of nimodipine status or era of treatment.
The studies that examined nimodipine as an intervention, leading to its acceptance as the standard of care, are historical outliers.
This raises concerns about nimodipine’s overall efficacy in treating aSAH, and the validity of its recommendation in the ruptured aSAH management guidelines.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Antiepileptic Effects of a Calcium Antagonist (Nimodipine) on Cefazolin‐Induced Epileptogenic Foci in Rabbits
Antiepileptic Effects of a Calcium Antagonist (Nimodipine) on Cefazolin‐Induced Epileptogenic Foci in Rabbits
Summary: The epileptogenic properties of cefazolin (CFZ) were utilized to induce an electrophysiological pattern of epilepsy in the rabbit. CFZ, cortically applied in different co...
Abstract P453: Histamine 2 Blockers and Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients
Abstract P453: Histamine 2 Blockers and Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients
Background: Histamine (H) 2 blockers led to a significant increase of the relative bioavailability of nimodipine and therefore may change tolerability of nimodipine in ...
Defining Optimal Dosing of Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review
Defining Optimal Dosing of Nimodipine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review
Abstract Background: Nimodipine has been first line prophylaxis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage for more than three decades, but its level of evidence h...
Nimodipine vs. Milrinone – Equal or Complementary Use? A Retrospective Analysis
Nimodipine vs. Milrinone – Equal or Complementary Use? A Retrospective Analysis
BackgroundCerebral vasospasm (CVS) continues to account for high morbidity and mortality in patients surviving the initial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Nimodipine is t...
Effect Western Medicines Combined With Nao-Xue-Shu in Patients With Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis
Effect Western Medicines Combined With Nao-Xue-Shu in Patients With Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To explore the efficacy of nimodipine, nifedipine, and edaravone (EDA) combined with Nao-Xue-Shu in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) and to deter...
Effects of Ca2+ Channel Blockers on Ca2+ Translocation Across Synaptosomal Membranes
Effects of Ca2+ Channel Blockers on Ca2+ Translocation Across Synaptosomal Membranes
Abstract: The binding of [3H]nimodipine to purified synaptic plasma membranes (SPM) isolated from sheep brain cortex was characterized, and the effects of nimodipine, nifedipine, ...
The effect of nimodipine, fentanyl and remifentanil intravenous products on the stability of propofol emulsions
The effect of nimodipine, fentanyl and remifentanil intravenous products on the stability of propofol emulsions
Nimodipine is used parenterally to treat ischemic neurological deficits caused by subarachnoid haemorraghe. Infusion of nimodipine should be continued during anaesthesia, surgery o...

Back to Top