Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Shared technology making in neoliberal ruins
View through CrossRef
Shared technology making refers to the practices, spaces and events that bear the hope and belief that collaborative and open ways of designing, making and modifying technology can improve our ways of living. Shared technology making in the context of the smart city reinvigorates explorations of the possibility of free, open and collaborative ways of engineering urban spaces, infrastructures and public life. Open innovation events and civic hacking initiatives often encourage members of local communities, residents, or city administrations to participate so that the problems they face and the knowledge they possess can be leveraged to develop innovations from the working (and failure) of urban everyday life and (non-)expert knowledges. However, the incorporation of shared technology making into urban contexts engender concerns around the right to participate in shared technology- and city-making. This paper addresses this issue by suggesting ways to consider both the neoliberal patterning of shared technology making and the patches and gaps that show the future possibility of shared city making. It explores the ways in which shared technology making are organised using hackathons and other hacking initiatives as an example. By providing a hackathon typology and detailed accounts of the experiences of organisers and participants of related events, the paper reconsiders the neoliberalisation of shared technology making. It attends to the multiple, entangled and conflictual relationships that do not follow corporate logic for considering the possibilities of more open and collaborative ways of technology- and city-making.
Title: Shared technology making in neoliberal ruins
Description:
Shared technology making refers to the practices, spaces and events that bear the hope and belief that collaborative and open ways of designing, making and modifying technology can improve our ways of living.
Shared technology making in the context of the smart city reinvigorates explorations of the possibility of free, open and collaborative ways of engineering urban spaces, infrastructures and public life.
Open innovation events and civic hacking initiatives often encourage members of local communities, residents, or city administrations to participate so that the problems they face and the knowledge they possess can be leveraged to develop innovations from the working (and failure) of urban everyday life and (non-)expert knowledges.
However, the incorporation of shared technology making into urban contexts engender concerns around the right to participate in shared technology- and city-making.
This paper addresses this issue by suggesting ways to consider both the neoliberal patterning of shared technology making and the patches and gaps that show the future possibility of shared city making.
It explores the ways in which shared technology making are organised using hackathons and other hacking initiatives as an example.
By providing a hackathon typology and detailed accounts of the experiences of organisers and participants of related events, the paper reconsiders the neoliberalisation of shared technology making.
It attends to the multiple, entangled and conflictual relationships that do not follow corporate logic for considering the possibilities of more open and collaborative ways of technology- and city-making.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Strategies for the Application of Emerging Information Technology in the Digital Recording of Cultural Heritage at Mingxi Nanshan Site
Strategies for the Application of Emerging Information Technology in the Digital Recording of Cultural Heritage at Mingxi Nanshan Site
Abstract
Digging deep into the value of the cultural heritage of Mingxi Nanshan Ruins and continuing the historical lineage is a mission given by history to conte...
Neoliberalism in South African higher education language policy: A decolonial perspective
Neoliberalism in South African higher education language policy: A decolonial perspective
The global spread and hegemony of English as a medium of teaching, learning and research has come to be closely associated with neoliberalisation of higher education in the univers...
Economization of Self: Constructing a Female Neoliberal Subject in Eílís Ní Dhuibhne’s Fox, Swallow, Scarecrow
Economization of Self: Constructing a Female Neoliberal Subject in Eílís Ní Dhuibhne’s Fox, Swallow, Scarecrow
The paper focuses on the interdisciplinary textual analysis of Eílís Ní Dhuibhne’s Fox, Swallow, Scarecrow which addresses the complex human condition under the absolute reign of c...
Strata/Sedimenta/Lamina: In Ruin(s)
Strata/Sedimenta/Lamina: In Ruin(s)
Ruins, their evocations and enigmas, have been a source of fascination since the advent of civilization. Both coordinating and distressing the relations of space and time, ruins ar...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...
ÖFKE EKONOMİSİ
ÖFKE EKONOMİSİ
Bu nitel araştırma; neoliberal toplumda üretilen öfkeli öznellikleri eleştirel biçimde sorgulamaya yönelik durum çalışmasıdır. Araştırma verileri; neoliberal yaşam felsefesini ve ö...
Man without Capital: Cultural Dispossession and Neoliberal Survival in Turkish Cinema Between 1980-1990
Man without Capital: Cultural Dispossession and Neoliberal Survival in Turkish Cinema Between 1980-1990
This article investigates how Turkish cinema transformed under neoliberal restructuring following the 1980 military coup, proposing “Neoliberal Realism” as a new conceptual framewo...

