Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Thomas Burke and State Sovereignty, 1777
View through CrossRef
Article II of the Articles of Confederation states that “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly del-egated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” While the provision is well-known, its author, Thomas Burke of North Carolina, is not. Scholars who have explored Burke’s role in crafting the Article have described him as the father of states’ rights or a republican ideo-logue and often dismiss Article II as unimportant to the American founding. This essay challenges those interpretations. It explores the context of Burke’s words and actions in 1777 to understand better his reasoning for calling for what became Article II. From his congres-sional debates with Richard Henry Lee and clashes with James Wilson over the use of implied and extra-constitutional powers to his calls for a bicameral Confederation Congress, Burke concluded that a provision that properly constitutionalized and protected a division of powers be-tween the states and central government was necessary. Rather than being an ideologue, this article reveals Burke to be searching for a so-lution to the metropolitan-periphery problem while remaining faithful to what he perceived to be the constitutional principles of the Ameri-can Revolution. Thus, rather than a neglected or dismissed member of the American founding, Burke emerges as an important theorist of fed-eralism.
University of Wisconsin Law School
Title: Thomas Burke and State Sovereignty, 1777
Description:
Article II of the Articles of Confederation states that “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly del-egated to the United States, in Congress assembled.
” While the provision is well-known, its author, Thomas Burke of North Carolina, is not.
Scholars who have explored Burke’s role in crafting the Article have described him as the father of states’ rights or a republican ideo-logue and often dismiss Article II as unimportant to the American founding.
This essay challenges those interpretations.
It explores the context of Burke’s words and actions in 1777 to understand better his reasoning for calling for what became Article II.
From his congres-sional debates with Richard Henry Lee and clashes with James Wilson over the use of implied and extra-constitutional powers to his calls for a bicameral Confederation Congress, Burke concluded that a provision that properly constitutionalized and protected a division of powers be-tween the states and central government was necessary.
Rather than being an ideologue, this article reveals Burke to be searching for a so-lution to the metropolitan-periphery problem while remaining faithful to what he perceived to be the constitutional principles of the Ameri-can Revolution.
Thus, rather than a neglected or dismissed member of the American founding, Burke emerges as an important theorist of fed-eralism.
Related Results
The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
<p>“Popular sovereignty” is central to liberal democracy, but the concept of sovereignty—the right to rule and make the rules—has many difficulties and ambiguities that have ...
Nation-state and Sovereignty in Contemporary Political Discourse
Nation-state and Sovereignty in Contemporary Political Discourse
Sovereignty has had a fundamental importance in modern political discourse. Politically, the term ‘sovereignty’ is used as ‘absolute overlordship or complete suzerainty’. Sovereign...
The Origins of the Kenneth Burke Society
The Origins of the Kenneth Burke Society
The Kenneth Burke Society was founded during Burke’s lifetime by scholars in communication, literature, sociology, and other fields to promote the study and application of Burke’s ...
A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
AbstractA genealogical account of state sovereignty explores the ways in which the concept has emerged, evolved, and is in decline today. Sovereignty has a theological foundation, ...
State Judicial Sovereignty
State Judicial Sovereignty
In our “dual sovereignty,” we have a dual judiciary. While the Constitution creates a single Supreme Court, and gives Congress the power to constitute inferior tribunals, predatin...
Koncepcja „czwartego stanu” Edmunda Burke’a podana przez Thomasa Carlyle’a. Refleksje o polityce i komunikowaniu
Koncepcja „czwartego stanu” Edmunda Burke’a podana przez Thomasa Carlyle’a. Refleksje o polityce i komunikowaniu
Concept of “fourth estate” of Edmund Burke by Thomas Carlyle. Afterthought about politics and communication Since 19th century, we have been speaking about speeches of Edmund Burke...
Madzimbamuto v. Lardner-Burke. Baron v. Ayre, Bezuidenhout, Dupont and Lardner-Burke.
Madzimbamuto v. Lardner-Burke. Baron v. Ayre, Bezuidenhout, Dupont and Lardner-Burke.
International law — Relation to municipal law — Jus gentium — Doctrine of State necessity — Whether part of law of Rhodesia — De jure and de facto Government — Use of international...
The Problem of State Sovereignty in the Context of Deglobalization
The Problem of State Sovereignty in the Context of Deglobalization
The relevance of the research topic is due to the inconsistency of globalist and deglobalist trends in the modern world and their influence on the sovereignty of state actors.The p...

