Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patricia Hill Collins’ concepts of intersectionality and Stephen Lukes’ concepts of power in the sociological understanding of political correctness

View through CrossRef
The article actualizes the issue of political correctness and the need to develop tools for its further study. Political correctness is considered in the context of gender studies and power relations. The concept of attitudes towards political correctness is revealed, and an attempt is also made to reveal the mechanism of the formation of linguistic attitudes in the mass consciousness through the prism of the concepts of Stephen Lukes and Patricia Hill Collins. The historical and theoretical foundations of the formation of intersectionality are also considered. Intersectionality is focused on the study of hierarchical differences between individuals and groups, depending on the complex intersections of their position in society, determined by many parameters. Respectively, the intersectional approach to the analysis of power and language allows us to solve a number of methodological difficulties associated with the combination of macro and micro levels, which makes possible the further empirical analysis of political correctness directly as a social phenomenon, while taking it out of the linguistic sphere. Political correctness is studied as a formal embodiment of intersectionality, taking into account all the features of cross-identity in linguistic practices. The use of the intersectional method makes it possible to reveal political correctness not only as speech prescriptions, but as a multi-component phenomenon that must be considered in close connection with various kinds of discrimination. The role of power, as the main element, in the mechanisms of interiorization of attitudes towards political correctness is revealed. We highlight the role of symbolic power in ensuring voluntary consent, which is the basis for political correctness and ensures its relatively stable nature. The possibility of using discourse analysis as one of the main methods of studying political correctness is substantiated.
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Title: Patricia Hill Collins’ concepts of intersectionality and Stephen Lukes’ concepts of power in the sociological understanding of political correctness
Description:
The article actualizes the issue of political correctness and the need to develop tools for its further study.
Political correctness is considered in the context of gender studies and power relations.
The concept of attitudes towards political correctness is revealed, and an attempt is also made to reveal the mechanism of the formation of linguistic attitudes in the mass consciousness through the prism of the concepts of Stephen Lukes and Patricia Hill Collins.
The historical and theoretical foundations of the formation of intersectionality are also considered.
Intersectionality is focused on the study of hierarchical differences between individuals and groups, depending on the complex intersections of their position in society, determined by many parameters.
Respectively, the intersectional approach to the analysis of power and language allows us to solve a number of methodological difficulties associated with the combination of macro and micro levels, which makes possible the further empirical analysis of political correctness directly as a social phenomenon, while taking it out of the linguistic sphere.
Political correctness is studied as a formal embodiment of intersectionality, taking into account all the features of cross-identity in linguistic practices.
The use of the intersectional method makes it possible to reveal political correctness not only as speech prescriptions, but as a multi-component phenomenon that must be considered in close connection with various kinds of discrimination.
The role of power, as the main element, in the mechanisms of interiorization of attitudes towards political correctness is revealed.
We highlight the role of symbolic power in ensuring voluntary consent, which is the basis for political correctness and ensures its relatively stable nature.
The possibility of using discourse analysis as one of the main methods of studying political correctness is substantiated.

Related Results

Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
This randomized clinical trial explores whether hormone intensification at start of androgen deprivation therapy alters selection of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations within ...
Intersectionality & Higher Education
Intersectionality & Higher Education
Intersectionality is a term coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989. Crenshaw, a scholar of law, critical race theory, and Black feminist legal theory, uses intersectionality to explai...
A Critique of Steven Lukes' `Power: A Radical View'
A Critique of Steven Lukes' `Power: A Radical View'
Steven Lukes' monograph Power: A Radical View (Lukes 1974) offers a critical analysis of pluralist and nondecision theories of power, leading on to a suggested `three-dimensional v...
Intersectionality in Political Science
Intersectionality in Political Science
At its heart, intersectionality is a study of relative power. As such, political scientists have employed this approach as both a theory and method to examine political behavior an...
Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19
Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19
ImportanceThe efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19.Design...

Back to Top