Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Cytogenetics
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In the pre‐genomics era, the field of comparative cytogenetics was restricted to the comparison of banded chromosome preparations of the species being studied. Subsequent application of molecular biology tools to cytogenetics facilitated the development of molecular cytogenetics. In particular, fluorescence
in situ
hybridisation (
FISH
) improved our ability to compare genomes at the chromosomal and subchromosomal levels, leading to much more defined knowledge about the processes of gross chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred during evolution. In the past few years, as more whole genomes have been sequenced, the new wealth of genome information alongside enhanced technologies has advanced cytogenetic studies to a resolution far beyond that of the light microscope. This convergence of genome‐integrated resources with conventional cytogenetics catalysed the emergence of cytogenomics. Using a variety of analytical platforms, cytogenomics provides more detailed study of chromosome changes within and between species, with resolution of just a few kilobases. Within the broader field of comparative genomics, comparative cytogenetics has provided opportunities to understand more about our own genome architecture and function, in the context of the dynamic process of speciation and evolutionary change. In the biomedical arena, the field of One Medicine has embraced a comparative approach to expedite gene discovery using appropriate animal models of disease. This article briefly summarises some of the work that has resulted in a greater understanding of the comparative cytogenetics of mammals, especially in the context of their relationship to the human karyotype.
Key Concepts
Genomes of different species are organised into different chromosome numbers, sizes and morphologies (karyotypes).
While karyotypes differ, cytogenetic approaches may be used to make direct comparisons.
The emergence of high‐quality genome sequences for numerous species provides new tools to make higher resolution comparisons of the chromosome of such species.
Breakpoints along chromosomes that occur in cancer cells may be similar to those associated with speciation.
Chromosome changes in cancers may be shared between species, suggestive of an evolutionarily conserved pathogenetic mechanism.
Title: Comparative Cytogenetics
Description:
Abstract
In the pre‐genomics era, the field of comparative cytogenetics was restricted to the comparison of banded chromosome preparations of the species being studied.
Subsequent application of molecular biology tools to cytogenetics facilitated the development of molecular cytogenetics.
In particular, fluorescence
in situ
hybridisation (
FISH
) improved our ability to compare genomes at the chromosomal and subchromosomal levels, leading to much more defined knowledge about the processes of gross chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred during evolution.
In the past few years, as more whole genomes have been sequenced, the new wealth of genome information alongside enhanced technologies has advanced cytogenetic studies to a resolution far beyond that of the light microscope.
This convergence of genome‐integrated resources with conventional cytogenetics catalysed the emergence of cytogenomics.
Using a variety of analytical platforms, cytogenomics provides more detailed study of chromosome changes within and between species, with resolution of just a few kilobases.
Within the broader field of comparative genomics, comparative cytogenetics has provided opportunities to understand more about our own genome architecture and function, in the context of the dynamic process of speciation and evolutionary change.
In the biomedical arena, the field of One Medicine has embraced a comparative approach to expedite gene discovery using appropriate animal models of disease.
This article briefly summarises some of the work that has resulted in a greater understanding of the comparative cytogenetics of mammals, especially in the context of their relationship to the human karyotype.
Key Concepts
Genomes of different species are organised into different chromosome numbers, sizes and morphologies (karyotypes).
While karyotypes differ, cytogenetic approaches may be used to make direct comparisons.
The emergence of high‐quality genome sequences for numerous species provides new tools to make higher resolution comparisons of the chromosome of such species.
Breakpoints along chromosomes that occur in cancer cells may be similar to those associated with speciation.
Chromosome changes in cancers may be shared between species, suggestive of an evolutionarily conserved pathogenetic mechanism.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Therapy for AML with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC)
Therapy for AML with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC)
Abstract
Introduction
Patients with AML-MRC are almost older and highly resistant to chemotherapy, so that they are thought to be not eligible for int...
The Role of High-Risk Cytogenetics in Acute Kidney Injury of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Cohort Study
The Role of High-Risk Cytogenetics in Acute Kidney Injury of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Cohort Study
Multiple myeloma (MM) is frequently associated with cytogenetic abnormalities, with high-risk cytogenetics linked to poorer survival. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in MM, but...
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century
The powerful utilities of current DNA sequencing technology question the value of developing clinical cytogenetics any further. By briefly reviewing the historical and current chal...
Corrigenda: Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2022) A critical review on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae with updates on Indian taxa. Comparative Cytogenetics 16(2): 93–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v16.i2.79033
Corrigenda: Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2022) A critical review on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae with updates on Indian taxa. Comparative Cytogenetics 16(2): 93–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v16.i2.79033
The cytogenetic relationships in the species of Cucurbitaceae are becoming immensely important to answer questions pertaining to genome evolution. Here, a simplified and updated da...
Survival Based on Metaphase Versus Interphase Cells for 154 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.
Survival Based on Metaphase Versus Interphase Cells for 154 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.
Abstract
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) has been studied by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization using DNA probes (FISH) on interphase...
High P53 Protein Expression Level Independent of Mutational Status Is An Adverse Prognostic Factor for Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
High P53 Protein Expression Level Independent of Mutational Status Is An Adverse Prognostic Factor for Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Abstract 1490
Background:
The tumor suppressor p53 is frequently mutated in human cancer, including acut...
Experience of Conventional Cytogenetics in Elderly Cytopenic Indian Patients Suspected with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Experience of Conventional Cytogenetics in Elderly Cytopenic Indian Patients Suspected with Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Abstract
Idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) includes a highly heterogeneous population with unknown natural history; however, some patients dev...

