Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems, their Ethics, and their Regulation under International Law

View through CrossRef
An international public debate over the law and ethics of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) has been underway since 2012, with those urging legal regulation of AWS under existing principles and requirements of the international law of armed conflict in argument with opponents who favour, instead, a preemptive international treaty ban on all such weapons. This chapter provides an introduction to this international debate, offering the main arguments on each side. These include disputes over defining an AWS, the morality and law of automated targeting and target selection by machine, and the interaction of humans and machines in the context of lethal weapons of war. Although the chapter concludes that a categorical ban on AWS is unjustified morally and legally—favouring the law of armed conflict’s existing case-by-case legal evaluation—it offers an exposition of arguments on each side of the AWS issue.
Title: Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems, their Ethics, and their Regulation under International Law
Description:
An international public debate over the law and ethics of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) has been underway since 2012, with those urging legal regulation of AWS under existing principles and requirements of the international law of armed conflict in argument with opponents who favour, instead, a preemptive international treaty ban on all such weapons.
This chapter provides an introduction to this international debate, offering the main arguments on each side.
These include disputes over defining an AWS, the morality and law of automated targeting and target selection by machine, and the interaction of humans and machines in the context of lethal weapons of war.
Although the chapter concludes that a categorical ban on AWS is unjustified morally and legally—favouring the law of armed conflict’s existing case-by-case legal evaluation—it offers an exposition of arguments on each side of the AWS issue.

Related Results

Ethics of Caring in Environmental Ethics
Ethics of Caring in Environmental Ethics
Indigenous ethics and feminist care ethics offer a range of related ideas and tools for environmental ethics. These ethics delve into deep connections and moral commitments between...
The Future of African Customary Law
The Future of African Customary Law
Customary laws and traditional institutions in Africa constitute comprehensive legal systems that regulate the entire spectrum of activities from birth to death. Once the sole sour...
The EU Crowdfunding Regulation
The EU Crowdfunding Regulation
Abstract Part of the Oxford EU Financial Regulation Series, this book provides an in-depth and timely analysis of the EU Crowdfunding Regulation, which is intended t...
6 Customary International Law
6 Customary International Law
If the status of customary international law corresponded to that of conventional international law (or treaties), the courts might, to some extent consider and have regard to it, ...
Privacy and the Role of International Law in the Digital Age
Privacy and the Role of International Law in the Digital Age
AbstractThis book examines the role of international law in securing privacy and data protection in the digital age. Driven mainly by the transnational nature of privacy threats in...
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics
Abstract This edited volume comprises 19 original essays in nursing ethics by an international, interdisciplinary group of scholars, researchers, and clinicians. The...
International Survey of Family Law
International Survey of Family Law
The International Society of Family Law is an independent, international, and non-political scholarly association dedicated to the study, research and discussion of family law and ...
European and Domestic Law
European and Domestic Law
Chapter 4 turns to the domestic law of the countries of Europe, arguing that the combination within European public law of EU law, the law of the ECHR, and of domestic law cannot b...

Back to Top